[Talk-GB] Residential flat above an unconnected business
Warin
61sundowner at gmail.com
Fri May 21 07:16:01 UTC 2021
On 20/5/21 5:52 am, Tom Crocker wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, 16 May 2021, 12:42 Jeremy Harris, <jgh at wizmail.org
> <mailto:jgh at wizmail.org>> wrote:
>
> On 16/05/2021 11:35, David Woolley wrote:
> <snip>
> You didn't speak to the original point of how to map the flat over
> the shop. What's the best way to express
> - a slice of a terrace
> - where the ground floor is a butchers, and has a lean-to out the back
> and its own carpaking space
> - the first floor is a dentist
> - the second floor is residential flat
>
>
>
> Can I have a stab at "the second floor is a residential flat". I've no
> experience of indoor mapping
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging but this
> seems like a good use for it. So I think the second floor would be
> mapped as an area with indoor=level, level=2. Then how to express that
> it's residential? According to Nathan Case's new page multi-tagging of
> the building:use tag is quite popular, so e.g.
> building:use=residential;commercial on the building. But perhaps we
> should have level:use=residential instead on the level (or as well?)
> It's not documented or popular
> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/level%3Ause but it seems like
> the only way to express it, which I guess would be useful for the kind
> of analysis Rupert was talking about on that other thread.
>
> Anyway, just an idea. Happy mapping!
Indoor mapping maps things like rooms, corridors, stairs.. not the whole
floor unless that is a single space.
So I don't think indoor mapping is suitable for mapping the use of each
floor.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20210521/5ab7be50/attachment.htm>
More information about the Talk-GB
mailing list