[Talk-GB] "designated" and "permissive" confuse new people
Chris Hodges
chris at c-hodges.co.uk
Mon Oct 4 08:41:30 UTC 2021
As someone who may have made this mistake in the past, I reckon along
with requesting confirmation, we should have a "more info" link (not
"Wiki" IMO though that's where it should point) as close as possible.
I often find myself on bridleways (and less often footpaths) that are
also private road, farm building access, or shared driveways. The
distinction between "access=destination" and "foot,horses,bicycles=yes,
motor_vehicles=destination" is perhaps a little subtle. Here's one that
I got wrong in a different way (fixed now) by putting
"motor_vehicles=no" when it's the way to drive up to the houses
("private" vs. "destination" is another question):
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/884300724
The actual "designated" vs. "permissive" shouldn't be too hard for
anyone familiar with "permissive" on OS maps.
Chris
On 02/10/2021 21:02, Jon Pennycook wrote:
> This sounds like a good idea: "request confirmation for commonly
> misunderstood options"
>
> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 at 19:06, David Woolley <forums at david-woolley.me.uk
> <mailto:forums at david-woolley.me.uk>> wrote:
>
> On 02/10/2021 18:53, David Woolley wrote:
> > I guess tools could indicate country specific assumptions, when
> > providing arrays of check boxes, and give detailed explanations
> > (although simply greying out is probably wrong, as there may be
> cases to
> > override assumptions - maybe greyed with and without a check
> mark?), and
> > request confirmation for commonly misunderstood options,
>
> Oops, I mis-edited the above when composing, and the parentheses
> are in
> a confusion place. It was supposed to say:
>
> I guess tools could indicate country specific assumptions, when
> providing arrays of check boxes, (although simply greying out is
> probably wrong, as there may be cases to override assumptions - maybe
> greyed with and without a check mark?) and give detailed
> explanations,
> and request confirmation for commonly misunderstood options
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20211004/f4ad1fd2/attachment.htm>
More information about the Talk-GB
mailing list