[Talk-GB] Historic railways and route=train - is this good practice?
Tony Shield
tonyosm9 at gmail.com
Thu Sep 2 17:03:22 UTC 2021
Guys
Wandering through OPNVKarte I noted a railway line running through
Kielder Water - an impossibility, further investigation showed the
railway ways as abandoned or razed and part of a relation
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8213509/history , the Riccarton
and Hexham railway. I suspect it was being rendered due to the
route=train tag being set in the relation even though state=abandoned is
present.
There is a similar rendering for the similarly abandoned Solway Junction
Railway -
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9220571#map=11/54.9165/-3.2530&layers=O
As these two railways have long being extinct is it correct for them to
be route=train which I regards as current use, or should they be a new
thing such as route=historic?
TonyS999
More information about the Talk-GB
mailing list