[Talk-GB] non-attributed map

[Simon Poole]

Just a note on the side: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Substantial_-_Guideline 
has a big notice at the top that in my experience seems to be written in 
invisible ink. you should always be referring to the definite documents 
published by the OSMF and not, in the best case historical, documents on 
the wiki, in this case 
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Community_Guidelines/Substantial_-_Guideline

Simon


Am 05.09.2021 um 06:44 schrieb Kai Michael Poppe:
> Hi Graham,
>
> the Wiki [1] it says:
> "So, we have focused on what "insubstantial" rather than "substantial" means. We've set the boundary we are happy with at basically: village map OK, town map not OK."
> (with that sentence describing where not attributing OSM would be ok-ish)
>
> As the map you linked is essentially a world-map that just happens to only have POIs on the Island of Great Britain I would always argue that that is substantial use.
>
> I trust that you've seen the Wiki page [2] for pages lacking proper attribution, there you'll also find an example email if you need help telling them your concern. If you add the site to the table on the site that would also be great for tracking progress.
>
> Kai
>
> [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Substantial_-_Guideline
> [2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lacking_proper_attribution
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20210905/678d9dc1/attachment.sig>