[Talk-GB] Duplicate crossing?

[Ed Loach]

Matt wrote:

> Whilst out surveying I noticed what seems to be a duplicate crossing: 
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235988948
> 
> Cross checking against the Bing street level imagery I can only see one 
> crossing so should this duplicate be removed or have I missed something?

It looks like the link you've sent was the original crossing mapped (as the way id is a lower number) and the duplicate was added as part of adding the Jubilee Walkway recently (which has mapped selected pavements as footpaths to create the relation). 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13044251#map=19/51.52568/-0.12544

I would be tempted to remove the one you linked to though, but comparing tags you might want to transfer lit=yes to the new one, check which surface value is correct (doesn't look like paving_stones on bing), and consider whether to add a suitable node to transfer the dropped kerb information that is on the southern end of the way you linked above.

Ed