[Talk-GB] Core paths

[nathan case]

It looks like they do though I’m not sure how consistent it is: https://data.spatialhub.scot/dataset/core_paths-is/resource/28950a25-9b77-460d-9c69-6a1e17553bcc

Unfortunately it seems that the licence for that dataset is not open and so cannot be used in OSM.

What might be a good tag for the refs - assuming there is an open data source for them? Using/expanding prow_ref? Or perhaps creating a new tag (e.g., core_ref or reg:GB:something?)

From: Dave F via Talk-GB <talk-gb at openstreetmap.org>
Sent: 05 February 2022 20:49
To: talk-gb at openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Core paths

Are they defined with a reference similar to prow_ref by a local authority?

DaveF
On 05/02/2022 20:16, nathan case wrote:
Hi all,

I’ve created a wiki page for the tag designation=core_paths: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:designation%3Dcore_path

Would anyone interested, please take a look over and provide edits/suggestions/discussion. Particularly, are the suggested tags appropriate? Are all core paths, by default, bridleways (seeing as they are designated for horse riders)?

I’m far more familiar with PRoWs in England and Wales but felt these deserved their own wiki page too as an important part of Scotland’s path network.

Thanks!



_______________________________________________

Talk-GB mailing list

Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org>

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20220206/91935f42/attachment.htm>