[Talk-GB] Non-intuitive addresses

[ndrw6]

On 12/02/2022 17:48, Mark Goodge wrote:
> 
> In this particular case, I don't think there is any real difficulty as 
> far as the building addresses are concerned. It's the name of the street 
> which is the issue here,


Are you sure there is no footpath with this name in the area? This is 
exactly what I've seen in:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/613731676
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/660816429
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/709592790

The first one is a gated footpath and houses "along it" are facing a 
street on the opposite side. This being a new build, all footpaths are 
properly signed.


> I'm more concerned about the Huxleys Way addresses, where I know that 
> they are currently wrongly tagged

This looks like a simple address tagging error. It needs a survey but it 
looks like a fairly straightforward case.

-ndrw6