[Talk-GB] Rossendale Way

[Andy Townsend]

On 24/01/2022 11:12, Martin Wynne wrote:
> On 24/01/2022 10:40, nathan case wrote:
>
>> since all those individual paths are not likely to be called 
>> “Rossendale Way”?
Some (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/74125055 are), but you're 
correct that most are not likely to be.
>
>
>
> I normally put such names in parentheses: "(Rossendale Way)" in 
> addition to adding them to the relation.

Please don't do this!  Sites that want to display the route relation can 
do that already; sites that want an actual street name don't want an 
extra bit in brackets.

Best Regards,

Andy