[Talk-GB] Conflation of TfL data into OSM (was: Is TfL data allowed on OSM?)

[Berrely]

I would say that, for the most part, their bike stand data was accurate and
it has definetely been a net plus in my area. No comment about the cycle
lane data. I did file a GitHub issue on their repo at the start of this
import asking for more descriptive changeset comments to be used but I've
received no reply.

Berrely

On Wed, 6 Jul 2022, 11:43 am Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB, <
talk-gb at openstreetmap.org> wrote:

>
> 4 lip 2022, 23:08 od ajt1047 at gmail.com:
>
> Frankly, I'm struggling to find a way to reply to that suggestion in a way
> that wouldn't (rightly) get me reprimanded by the list moderators.
>
> I would support full revert. For me large scale import, done without
> addressing feedback
> raised by mappers is sufficient reason in itself.
>
> Not doing this just encourages "lets import stuff and maybe it will stay
> even if we
> violated rules"
>
> Also, local mappers reported that they import outdated data, destroying
> what was correctly
> mapped.
>
> Maybe at least part of data can be usefully imported later?
>
> Disclaimer: I am not a local mapper
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20220706/979b9c40/attachment.htm>