[Talk-GB] Mapping School Streets
Paul Berry
pmberry2007 at gmail.com
Sun Jul 17 21:32:02 UTC 2022
If the scheme has a name, like this one* I mapped not long ago, then I
think it's fine to map it as a relation. All the associated ways are
related, after all.
*https://osm.org/relation/12024347
Regards,
*Paul*
On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 at 18:03, Steven Hirschorn <steven.hirschorn at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Thanks for the reply. I was thinking for two reasons:
> 1) because the hours of operation might change, or the whole scheme may be
> scrapped, so a relation would allow that to be changed in one place rather
> than manually looking for any ways that are covered by a scheme
> 2) because it would be handy to have an identifier for a particular scheme
> They can get more complex than the straight-line way I used earlier, such
> as this one (if I got the Overpass query right)
> https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1kbv
>
>
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 at 17:49, Rob Nickerson <rob.j.nickerson at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I don't think that's the right case to use a relation for. For example,
>> we don't put speed limits in a relation so why put this form of restriction
>> in one?
>>
>> See Usage section of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation
>>
>> Thanks
>> Rob
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-GB mailing list
>> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20220717/50dc656b/attachment.htm>
More information about the Talk-GB
mailing list