[Talk-GB] OS "standard map" and use of OSM ways marked private

[Cj Malone]

On Fri, 2022-07-22 at 20:21 +0100, Mark Goodge wrote:
> It does seem a slightly odd mix of data. As well as steps, they seem
> to 
> be missing some service roads, which gives a somewhat misleading 
> impression of connectivity in some places.

Yeah, it also renders highway=footway + footway=crossing, but not
highway=footway + footway=sidewalk.

> Also, they are showing property boundaries (presumably from the Land 
> Registry cadastral data), 

I think it's physical boundaries, not legal ones. So hedges, walls,
fences, etc.

Cj