[Talk-GB] City of Bath x2

[Russ McDermid]

Ok, sorry I got it wrong.
Yes, the relation was added a long time ago - I thought the Wiki advised
against using place=city on areas and nodes, but if this is correct, I'll
know for the future.
I'm not going to argue on Bath's admin, I had enough problems when my
Mother was the Deputy Mayor.
Consider this query closed.
Russ.

On Mon, 2 May 2022 at 09:38, Tom Hughes <tom at compton.nu> wrote:

> On 02/05/2022 07:08, Russ McDermid wrote:
>
> > Morning all,
> > Making maps for my Garmin, I stumbled on the fact that the City of Bath
> > appears twice. ... close to  my heart as I grew up there !
> > Once as a relation and once as a node:
> >
> > 1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5342409#map=13/51.3784/-2.3588
> > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5342409#map=13/51.3784/-2.3588>
> > 2. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/19472
> > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/19472>01
> >
> > Presume the first needs correcting as was put in by a newish mapper,
> > probably attempting to add new languages to City names, but I'm sure I
> > can't just delete the relation.
>
> I'm not sure why you think it was put in by a newish mapper - it is
> seven years old and was added by a well known member of the community
> and has been edited 16 times since.
>
> It also has the second object (the node) as the admin_centre member
> which is as expected unless you want to argue that Bath can't have
> an admin_centre as it has no administration.
>
> Tom
>
> --
> Tom Hughes (tom at compton.nu)
> http://compton.nu/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20220502/5544b41d/attachment.htm>