[Talk-GB] OSM should not be a database dump.

[Dave F]

On 08/02/2023 17:08, jc129 at mail.com wrote:
> The data on the challenge hasn't been updated and is nearly one year old

So, not only is the existing data liable to be out of date, but any 
'new' additions are also potentially old.

This reinforces my argument that OSM should leave this professionally 
maintained (by law?) database as a separate entity & only reference back 
to it.

DaveF