<div dir="ltr">Hockley Viaduct near Winchester does get rendered:<div><br></div><div><a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/108241777#map=18/51.03628/-1.32230">http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/108241777#map=18/51.03628/-1.32230</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>but probably because there is a path on it. Would that be a workaround for you Andy?</div><div><br></div><div>Thomas</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:25 AM, SK53 <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sk53.osm@gmail.com" target="_blank">sk53.osm@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>Bridges and other significant remaining infrastructure of railways tagged as railway=abandoned ceased to be rendered on the Standard rendering some time ago. There was a degree of dissension with this decision: <a href="https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/542" target="_blank">https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/542</a>. <br><br>Certainly I recall a few grumps to that effect on the osm-gb IRC channel: not least because of the potential value of such routes for walkers & cyclists. <br><br></div>Jerry<br></div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 13 July 2015 at 08:53, Andy Mabbett <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk" target="_blank">andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">The significant (and massive) disused railway viaduct near Thrapston:<br>
<br>
   <a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264894970" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264894970</a><br>
<br>
does not render on our default map:<br>
<br>
   <a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/52.3914/-0.5433" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/52.3914/-0.5433</a><br>
<br>
despite being a significant and very visible landmark:<br>
<br>
   <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/dr_opulentfish/2870819874/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.flickr.com/photos/dr_opulentfish/2870819874/</a><br>
<br>
I don't want fudge things to just "tag for the renderer", but is there<br>
a relevant tag missing, or should we change the rendering styles to<br>
show such objects?<br>
<span><font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Andy Mabbett<br>
@pigsonthewing<br>
<a href="http://pigsonthewing.org.uk" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://pigsonthewing.org.uk</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-GB mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a><br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-GB mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>