[Talk-ht] PAHO Medical Facilities

Al Haraka alharaka at gmail.com
Thu Feb 4 02:59:14 GMT 2010


Kate,

I totally agree and understand about tagging dispensary, either means
not rendering.  I thought the implication here was that, in other
cases, we consider fudging the data a little bit for rendering.  I was
wondering this when I found medical facilites called dispensaries
prior with US Defense mapping data.  I feel like an idiot for not
having asked sooner, because I was curious where the balance was.

Then again, I heavily agree with the outcry from the most hardcore
developers and specialists on the list, that the data integrity is
important, and specialty renderers can be developed and put online
later if need be.  Then again, I get the feeling I misunderstood a
taxonomy discussion for a (more or less, not sure in this case)
practical one.

Best,
_AJS

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Kate Chapman <kate at maploser.com> wrote:
> AJ,
>
> Ah I see your point.  I think though that amenity=dispensary versus
> health_facility_type=dispensary neither would be rendered until
> someone put in support anyway.  There isn't a symbol for
> amenity=dispensary right now either.
>
> Unless I'm misunderstanding the rendering process.
>
> -Kate
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Al Haraka <alharaka at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Kate,
>>
>> I am not sure if I am following properly, but I think the issue here
>> will be proper rendering (again, depending on what server and how
>> selective the renderer; there are many Haiti specific side projects
>> pulling from OSM as I understand and rendering in different ways to
>> highlight different, I hate to say, POI's).  I understood
>> Jean-Guilhem's concern to be that the data will be uploaded, but not
>> readily visible.
>>
>> Am I mistaken here?
>>
>> Best,
>> _AJS
>



-- 
Alexander J. Stein
Cell:  (201) 412-9479
Email: alharaka at gmail.com
Skype: alexander.j.stein
AIM:   elduderino6886




More information about the Talk-ht mailing list