[OSM-talk-ie] Mapping of farmland

[Ken Guest]

Fair enough. I must've misinterpreted "Does this data really belong in OSM?
 Fair enough the fields but the names?"  :)

Ken


On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Webmaster <webmaster at killyfole.org.uk>wrote:

> I don’t have an issue with it at all!  The original poster asked why the
> sudden interest in mapping farmland.  In which I was curious about finding
> out as well.  We have now established the reason.
>
> I asked about the general feeling within the Irish OSM community (people
> subscribed to this list) on giving field's a name.  It does not bother me
> either way.  We are getting field boundary data and those users are getting
> experience mapping, therefore can only be a good thing.  I do however
> support the use of another tag (as suggested by Tom) to record the names,
> but that's just personal feeling on the matter, I wont be losing any sleep
> over it!
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 13:52:34 -0000, Ken Guest <kguest at php.net> wrote:
>
>  I've added one or two names to fields myself and I don't see what the
>> issue
>> is that our chap in Killyfoyle has with field names being added.
>> There are those of us that add reference numbers of streetlamps and post
>> boxes to OSM, this isn't much different and with the general attitude of
>> "tag everything, we'll migrate it if a more specific repository for this
>> info comes along" this is surely not an issue.
>>
>> Ken
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ie mailing list
> Talk-ie at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
>



-- 
http://blogs.linux.ie/kenguest/