[OSM-talk-ie] Place names and townland boundaries
moltonel 3x Combo
moltonel at gmail.com
Sun Oct 26 16:16:26 UTC 2014
On 26/10/2014, Killyfole and District Development Assocation
<webmaster at killyfole.org.uk> wrote:
> I know in my part of the world the GNS Nodes are extremely inaccurate, some
> are
> 1-10km off where they should be!! My advice would be to firstly find its
> correct
> location and using Bing check that there isn’t a hamlet at this location.
> Like a small
> cluster of houses. If it is actually a hamlet, move it into position where
> it should be.
> Some of the nodes aren’t actually hamlets at all, just a large townland in
> the area, in
> these cases the node should be deleted once you have mapped the townland
> correctly.
I second that, GNS in Ireland is a little bit like TIGER in the USA:
good to have at the time, but showing its poor quality today.
GNS data can correspond to different "modern" OSM data, from cities to
uninhabited localities. Whenever you can, you should improve the GNS
data by moving it into proper position, or even replacing it with the
corresponding townland or residential area if it matches (one
shouldn't have two osm objects for the same physical thing).
Concerning the tags, all the "gns:"-prefixed ones are either redundant
or useless, and can be deleted if you happen to be modifying the node.
Same goes for "created_by" (I think josm removes that one
automatically) and the note. Keep the source tag, but don't hesitate
to amend it if you used other sources this time around.
More information about the Talk-ie
mailing list