[OSM-talk-ie] OSM IRL Annual General Meeting

[Ciarán Staunton]

Rory, yes... snow blinded . The sentence should read as:  "The DAC
structure is limiting in the scope of things the company may want to do
which is why DAC is not recommended."

On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 8:57 AM, Rory McCann <rory at technomancy.org> wrote:

> Hi Ciarán
>
> Good to get proper legal details. Good job. 👍
>
> On 28/02/18 22:18, Ciarán Staunton wrote:
>
>> The DAC structure is limiting in the scope of things the company may want
>> to do which is why CLG is not recommended.
>>
>
> Did you word this the right way? 😉
>
> The OpenStreetMap Foundation is a Company limited by guarantee as well. In
> the UK, OSMUK is a "Community Interest Company", but I think that's a new
> legal structure in the UK https://osmuk.org/become-member/
>
> It's great to see all of yous getting the ball rolling on this. 😁
>
> Rory
>