[Talk-in] Time for consensus

Mikel Maron mikel_maron at yahoo.com
Thu Oct 16 15:51:59 BST 2008



> Like others said, it is impractical to keep the roads constantly updated based on road condition. I would like to bring up another point. If you mark a portion of a national highway a territiary road, 
> the software (Mikel correct me if am wrong) will break the highway at the at high level zoom of the map. We should make the national highways to display uniformly across the country. Agree with 
> PlaneMad, road conditions can be an overlay (similar to kayak maps and bikers maps), and not be part of the base map. 
 Yes, road classification do appear at different zoom levels .. tertiary would appear at a lower zoom than primary.

It appears to me, at least, this discussion is about how things are rendered on the map, rather than how they should be tagged. The tags for road classification, number of lanes, under construction, etc, are all reasonably defined on the map features page. The debate is possibly over whether the mapnik rendering reflects the reality of all these tags together, and the answer seems no. Rendering is primarily about the road classification, which in India (and elsewhere) may not correspond to its travel worthiness. 

If that's the case, I'd suggest we come up with some recommendations for the main map styling, and submit them to the dev list. There's actually an active discussion right now on styling on the lists, the main map styling was changed just yesterday.

At least that's how I see it!

Mikel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/attachments/20081016/9e0044ba/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-in mailing list