[Talk-in] Relation tags for archaeological sites

I Chengappa imchengappa at gmail.com
Sat Apr 13 08:59:11 UTC 2013


I'd suggest some research first before settling on style=hoysala. Use of
'style' may possibly conflict with other uses of the word. And similar
questions may have been discussed before. I see that there is a shelved
discussion at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:architecture

See also

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:historic:era
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Historic


On 13 April 2013 09:10, <paramvir00 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Excellent idea Doc
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
>   *From: *doc.aneesh at gmail.com
> *Sent: *Saturday, 13 April 2013 1:34 PM
> *To: *OpenStreetMap in India
> *Reply To: *OpenStreetMap in India
> *Subject: *Re: [Talk-in] Relation tags for archaeological sites
>
> Oh so, style = hoysala is valid?
>
> Cool... Coz there are some well hidden temples of that era with such
> intricate carvings.. I'd want to put all the locations on osm and tag them
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-in mailing list
> Talk-in at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-in mailing list
> Talk-in at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/attachments/20130413/c72143bf/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-in mailing list