[Talk-is] Adjusting flow of Jökulsá á Fjöllum river

[Hauke Stieler]

Hi,

thanks for the quick reply. As you said, I separated them, so that the
boundaries haven't moved.

Hauke

On 05.05.20 18:55, Jóhannes Birgir Jensson wrote:
> The boundaries will have to be separated from the river flow.
> 
> Digital markers are now above geography in boundary marking.
> 
> -------- Upprunalegt skeyti --------
> Frá: Hauke Stieler <mail at hauke-stieler.de>
> Dagsetning: 5.5.2020 16:35 (GMT+00:00)
> Til: OpenStreetMap in Iceland <talk-is at openstreetmap.org>
> Efni: [Talk-is] Adjusting flow of Jökulsá á Fjöllum river
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I would like to edit the flow of the Jökulsá á Fjöllum river [0] near
> the Holuhraun lava field [1] as the lava field is quite new and the
> river flow outdated.
> 
> But: The river is also within several administration boundary relations.
> When I change the river flow, I also change the course of the boundaries.
> 
> Is that even a problem or is it ok to edit the river and therefore also
> change the boundaries?
> 
> In case this is a problem and the boundaries should stay where they are,
> I would create a new way for the river and tag the existing line with
> "boundary=administrative".
> 
> What do you think about this, I would like to hear some feedback :)
> 
> Hauke
> 
> [0] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/741064529
> [1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11071456
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-is mailing list
> Talk-is at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-is
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-is/attachments/20200505/0e9725bd/attachment.sig>