[Talk-it] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Survey on global and local communities in OpenStreetMap

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

Complimenti, siamo (gli Italiani) arrivati terzi nella community gara:
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2019/09/17/pre-sotm2019-survey-initial-numbers-and-reflections-from-board-members/
;-)



---------- Forwarded message ---------
Von: Mikel Maron <mikel.maron a gmail.com>
Date: Mi., 18. Sept. 2019 um 17:59 Uhr
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Survey on global and local communities in
OpenStreetMap
To: Talk Openstreetmap <talk a openstreetmap.org>, joost schouppe <
joost.schouppe a gmail.com>


Some first results from the OSM community survey
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2019/09/17/pre-sotm2019-survey-initial-numbers-and-reflections-from-board-members/
Thanks all who submitted! Curious to hear reactions and ideas here and at
SotM


* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron


On Saturday, August 10, 2019, 11:45:08 AM EDT, joost schouppe <
joost.schouppe a gmail.com> wrote:


Hi,

We had a tight schedule for this survey, because we want to be able to
present something by the next SotM. That explains why some questions aren't
exactly worded perfectly. It would have been better to get more people
involved and do more testing. But that inevitably slows things down. We did
ask the science mailing list for feedback, but the only response was a
volunteer to translate to Hungarian (thanks Levente!). And while I think
there are clearly some issues that we missed, the output will still be
quite useful.

I think we would like to get more people involved next time. The first
survey was really last minute, this one is a bit better prepared but still
made a few mistakes. The next one can be built over a bit more time. Oh

The "remote mapping" was added as a "nice to know" and wasn't even deeply
discussed between the three of us writing the actual survey questions.

We did intend to publish "raw data", and consulted with LWG to get a proper
wording for that. We understood that the "Publicly, aggregated and
anonymously " meant "answers presented together" in whatever form
(spreadsheet etc) and was not referring to a summary. If we misenterpreted
that (unfortunately that feels kind of obvious now), than we'll make sure
the wording is better next time.

And there is also the option to become an OSMF volunteer who has signed ad
NDA, for those who want to work with the raw data.

--
-------------- parte successiva --------------
Un allegato HTML è stato rimosso...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/attachments/20190919/a8c8d0f4/attachment.html>