[Talk-ke] Dadaab refugee camp data OSM import review

[Omwebu Naomi]

Hi Laura,



Thank you for responding and providing feedback.

Just to add onto what my colleague Lukasz has mentioned above:



*Data quality and accuracy- *For each facility type there’s a field for
whether they are functioning or not as of the dates provided. We cannot
know for sure the status as of now, but this being a one off import, we
hope that in the future someone will be able to update any infrastructure
changes.



*Closed camps- *For closed camps- Ifo 2, and Kambioos- the data provided
here was updated just before UNHCR handed over the camps' land and existing
infrastructure to the County government of Garissa for planning.



*Corrections and updates- *Currently REACH has no funding allocated for
infrastructure and service mapping exercise in Dadaab refugee camps, so
until then is when we will be able to update.



Let me  know whether you need further clarifications?



Best regards,

Naomi

On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:35 AM Lukasz KRUK <
lukasz.kruk at reach-initiative.org> wrote:

> Hi Laura,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your message, as well as your ongoing management of the Dadaab
> HOT Task! This is Lukasz, and I am helping Naomi with this import. I will
> let her reply to your points on data quality and accuracy and closed camps,
> and in the meantime address your other questions:
>
>
>
> > OSM Tagging
>
>
>
> I don’t think we have any tags that should be changed – can you please
> confirm if you have any specific ones in mind?
>
>
>
> > Import schedule
>
>
>
> I updated the import’s wiki page with more information, but generally –
> data prep should be done in the coming days/weeks, simultaneously as we are
> holding discussions with all concerned parties. Merging and conflict
> resolution are included in this, so we do not import anything that needs
> cleaning/fixing later on.
>
>
>
> > Corrections and updates
>
>
>
> This import is a one-off, though there may be future REACH activity
> involving primary data collection in Dadaab – Naomi would have a better
> idea than me. Though I have little influence on that, I hope we would then
> either repeat the import, or, even better, integrate OSM into the process
> itself so that we don’t move entire dataset into OSM post data collection,
> but rather update OSM directly in the course of field operations.
>
>
>
> > Deletion
>
>
>
> We do not expect deleting data from OSM as a part of this import.
>
>
>
> Please let me know if you have any other points?
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Lukasz
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ke mailing list
> Talk-ke at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ke
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ke/attachments/20200827/ec6a1da4/attachment-0001.htm>