[Talk-ko] Mailinglist in Korean?

[Max]

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=95

I personally think that it's not worth it to worry about those 
prohibitions, because North Koreans don't have that access to the 
internet anyways. The Forum might be a place though where some armchair 
mapper asks questions regarding mapping North Korea, so. Anyways, just a 
thought, not so important. Good we have that forum now, maybe a welcome 
post would be nice! (and something the search engines can index..)


On 2017년 03월 01일 03:31, 느림보 wrote:
> I asked to open users: South Korea forum. I limited region to South
> Korea because un-authorized communication between people in South Korea
> and people in North Korea is prohibited in both Countries.
>
>
> 2017-03-01 10:41 GMT+09:00 느림보 <nrimbo at gmail.com
> <mailto:nrimbo at gmail.com>>:
>
>     Opps, just Max said about interface language of mailman. I
>     misunderstood his suggestion, so I just tried to describe barriers
>     that I felt. (mailman and conversation language.) As 최규성 said I
>     think interface language is not a big deal.
>
>
>     2017-02-28 23:23 GMT+09:00 Max <abonnements at revolwear.com
>     <mailto:abonnements at revolwear.com>>:
>
>         Well, that's another big discussion about mailinglists vs. other
>         means of communication.
>
>         Some people for example prefer forums over email lists. There is
>         no "user: Korea" folder in the official osm forums
>         https://forum.openstreetmap.org/ <https://forum.openstreetmap.org/>
>
>         I'm not a fan of forums myself* so I am not volunteering to be
>         admin for that, but maybe someone else here wants to ask for the
>         creation of "users: Korea" there?
>
>         *exept https://www.discourse.org that one I found pretty amazing
>
>
>
>         On 2017년 02월 28일 13:35, 느림보 wrote:
>
>             >From systematic view, I think two reasons made few Korean speaking
>             members. One is clearly language. However, a mailing list
>             itself would
>             make it worse. I think a mailing list is one of the lease common
>             communication system in my country. People might don’t know
>             how to join
>             and act in this system. It looks like foreign culture. (I
>             don’t know,
>             too. I tried to response some previous threads but I
>             hesitated because I
>             don’t know what is impolite attitude in a mailing list.)
>
>
>
>             It might be very difficult to invite Korean contributors in
>             this system,
>             however more discussion in Korean might lead viewers into
>             discussion. So
>             strongly agree with this suggestion.
>
>
>             느림보 (Nrimbo)
>
>
>             2017-02-28 20:57 GMT+09:00 Max <abonnements at revolwear.com
>             <mailto:abonnements at revolwear.com>
>             <mailto:abonnements at revolwear.com
>             <mailto:abonnements at revolwear.com>>>:
>
>                 Since there is no separate email list for the DPRK, that
>             might be
>                 correct to use ko or am I missing something?
>
>
>
>                 On 2017년 02월 28일 12:26, Changwoo Ryu wrote:
>
>                     Actually "ko" is the ISO639 code for Korean
>             language. ("kr" ISO3166
>                     code for ROK.)
>
>
>                     2017-02-28 19:02 GMT+09:00 Max
>             <abonnements at revolwear.com <mailto:abonnements at revolwear.com>
>                     <mailto:abonnements at revolwear.com
>             <mailto:abonnements at revolwear.com>>>:
>
>
>                         Looking through
>                         https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/
>             <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/>
>                         <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/
>             <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/>>
>                         I noticed that most of them have the interface
>             in their
>                         respective language.
>                         talk-ko is in English though.
>                         (Not talking about the languag of the actual
>             conversations,
>                         just the mailman
>                         interface)
>
>                         Could this be a reason for the few korean
>             speaking members?
>                         Should this be changed? (I'd say yes)
>                         Any opinions, thoughts about it?
>