[Talk-lt] Is it OK to tag addr:flats / ref / ref:signed=no on entrance to an partment building?

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Hello and sorry for writing in English.

I am implementing something in StreetComplete and I want to ask is it
something that should be enabled in Lithuania.


Is it typical that entrance in an apartment with multiple entrance will have:

- signed range of flats, for example addr:flats=81-94 on entrance to staircase with flats 81 to 94
and/or
- ref=VI on entrance to staircase with code VI

Example from Poland: https://www.google.pl/maps/@50.0202346,19.9033715,3a,42.4y,202.36h,95.55t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sxM7gDCmkjQPWpvJaXWIG9A!2e0!5s20140601T000000!7i13312!8i6656

Is it OK to tag ref:signed=no on entrace=staircase/main in 
building=apartments with multiple entrances where neither
entrance code nor flat range is signed?

I am asking as I am unsure whether this quest should be enabled in your area or not.

For reference, work on this is tracked in
https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/3064
and
https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/pull/4066

It will be enabled in Poland, Bulgaria, Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Estonia and Romania.

Communities in Czech Republic, Serbia and Slovakia community
rejected this quest as not fitting in their area for one reason or another.

(is there any other country where this quest is likely to make sense?)

Note: in case of no replies or lack of consensus this quest will remain disabled.

If you have some feedback about StreetComplete - the best place to report it is https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues but you can also
reply in this thread for next few days (or start new one about SC-specific
problems in Lithuania?) as I will be subscribed for next few days here.

Sorry again for English.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-lt/attachments/20220606/94d924ff/attachment.htm>