[OpenStreetMap talk-lu] Reference format (Was: Meeting 2012)

[Pierre Carier]

I wrote CR 102 or N 11 because I found this in Germany and France. Before I
used C.R. 102.In Belgium there are no spaces. Standardising this is not
only a problem in Luxembourg, but it has to be done everywhere in OSM. I
don't know if there are or have been similar discussions in other
communities.

I used the tagwatch to find and correct the most beautiful tags, like
amenity:Bauernladen, but it's down for the moment.

Pierre

2012/6/4 Guillaume Rischard <openstreetmap at stereo.lu>

> On 7 May 2012, at 09:10, Pierre Carier wrote:
>
> > discussion about tagging, name:lb or alt_name:, or CR 110 and C.R. 110
> (for example)
>
> About references:
>
> We seem to have three competing ways of writing those references: CR102 CR
> 102 and C.R. 102.
>
> I'm proposing standardising on the CR102 format, no spaces, no full stops.
> It is compatible with the Ponts et Chaussées and Wikipedia, and the other
> syntaxes add no information.
>
> Here is an inventory of all the ref values we have in Luxembourg:
> http://pastie.textmate.org/4025170
>
> References I will standardise if everyone is ok are A, B on this side of
> the German border, CFL, CR, E, N, PC and VDL. We can then compare "our"
> list with http://www.pch.public.lu/reseau_routier/reseau_routier.pdf.
>
> In my inventory, there are also references like "Cul de Sac", "Roman Road"
> or "Condition bad". Anyone should feel free to clean those up.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Guillamue
> _______________________________________________
> talk-lu mailing list
> talk-lu at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lu
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-lu/attachments/20120604/a421e49e/attachment.html>