From janis.rocans at gmail.com Sat Jan 1 00:18:09 2011 From: janis.rocans at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-13?B?SuJuaXMgUm/o4m5z?=) Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 02:18:09 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?iso-8859-13?q?OSM_r=EEki?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Op?, paldies, pam??in??u :) 2010/12/30 > On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 15:40:23 +0200, J?nis Ro??ns > wrote: > > Labdien! >> >> Man ir doma nomain?t mapi sen tais?t? lap? http://lans-kapnes.lv/ uz OSM. >> Re?li tur tagad ir vienk?r?i shematisks z?m?jums >> K?dam jau ir pieredze? >> >> J?nis. >> > > > Sekojo?ais html kods j?ievieto vajadz?gaj? viet? m?jaslap?: > >
View > Larger Map > > Te vis?di sare???t?ki veidi ar?: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Deploying_your_own_Slippy_Map > -- > Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From polis.gints at gmail.com Sat Jan 1 11:16:36 2011 From: polis.gints at gmail.com (Gints Polis) Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 13:16:36 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] pdf un imports Message-ID: Kautk?da iemesla d?? PDFIMPORT neimport? kr?su ple???us... piem?ram ?eit za?ie me?i?i: http://www.pargaujasnovads.lv/terit_planoj/II_sejums_Grafiska_dala/tematiskie_atteli/kultura_rekreacija.pdf -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From viesturz at gmail.com Sat Jan 1 15:31:50 2011 From: viesturz at gmail.com (Viesturs Zarins) Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 17:31:50 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] pdf un imports In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Vari pastastit precizi ka megini omportet? Ar krasam dazreiz ir ta ka pdf skatitajs vinas druscin pamaina krasu profila ietekme. On 1 Jan 2011 13:16, "Gints Polis" wrote: > Kautk?da iemesla d?? PDFIMPORT neimport? kr?su ple???us... piem?ram ?eit > za?ie me?i?i: > > http://www.pargaujasnovads.lv/terit_planoj/II_sejums_Grafiska_dala/tematiskie_atteli/kultura_rekreacija.pdf -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From richlv at nakts.net Sat Jan 1 18:30:57 2011 From: richlv at nakts.net (Rich) Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 20:30:57 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] OpenStreetBrowser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4D1F72E1.8020803@nakts.net> On 12/30/10 20:33, Raivis Dejus wrote: > Sveicin?ti! > > Jaun? gada sveiciena viet? man k?da noder?ga saite - > http://www.openstreetbrowser.org/ shajaa sakaraa mosh veel ko deriigu var atrast ieksh http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/List_of_OSM_based_Services un http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Software > Var izmanto pa?i vai ieteikt mamm?m, t?tiem, radiem, draugiem un > kol??iem, lai vi?i var tikt pie Open Street Map dateim. > R?ks ar ko mekl?t da??dus objektus. Iesp?jams k?dreiz noder ;) > > -- > Cie??, > Raivis Dejus -- Rich From polis.gints at gmail.com Sat Jan 1 19:40:15 2011 From: polis.gints at gmail.com (Gints Polis) Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 21:40:15 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] pdf un imports In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Nu es tur m??inu tos za?os me?i?us dab?t iek??... Gintc 2011/1/1 Viesturs Zarins > Vari pastastit precizi ka megini omportet? > > Ar krasam dazreiz ir ta ka pdf skatitajs vinas druscin pamaina krasu > profila ietekme. > On 1 Jan 2011 13:16, "Gints Polis" wrote: > > Kautk?da iemesla d?? PDFIMPORT neimport? kr?su ple???us... piem?ram ?eit > > za?ie me?i?i: > > > > > http://www.pargaujasnovads.lv/terit_planoj/II_sejums_Grafiska_dala/tematiskie_atteli/kultura_rekreacija.pdf > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From viesturz at gmail.com Sun Jan 2 17:55:37 2011 From: viesturz at gmail.com (Viesturs Zarins) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 19:55:37 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] pdf un imports In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: T?p?c ka pati karte nav vektordati, bet tikai liels bitmaps, prec?z?k gan, vair?ki. Diem??l nekas nesan?ks. Viesturs. 2011. gada 1. janv?ris 21:40 Gints Polis rakst?ja: > Nu es tur m??inu tos za?os me?i?us dab?t iek??... > > Gintc > > 2011/1/1 Viesturs Zarins > > Vari pastastit precizi ka megini omportet? >> >> Ar krasam dazreiz ir ta ka pdf skatitajs vinas druscin pamaina krasu >> profila ietekme. >> On 1 Jan 2011 13:16, "Gints Polis" wrote: >> > Kautk?da iemesla d?? PDFIMPORT neimport? kr?su ple???us... piem?ram ?eit >> > za?ie me?i?i: >> > >> > >> http://www.pargaujasnovads.lv/terit_planoj/II_sejums_Grafiska_dala/tematiskie_atteli/kultura_rekreacija.pdf >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From viesturz at gmail.com Sun Jan 2 17:59:38 2011 From: viesturz at gmail.com (Viesturs Zarins) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 19:59:38 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] latas konference In-Reply-To: <4D175FA5.9060603@nakts.net> References: <4D0B2D63.4030404@nakts.net> <4D175FA5.9060603@nakts.net> Message-ID: Sveiks! Es te s?ku galv? uzmest fin?lo lekcijas formu konferencei. Vai esi ko labu sadar?jis? Viesturs. 2010/12/26 Rich > On 12/17/10 15:36, Viesturs Zarins wrote: > >> Sveiks! >> >> Ir apstiprin?ts datums - 18 janv?ris, uzst??an?s vieta rezerv?ta, >> j?gatavo saturs. >> > > es varbuut shito nozheeloshu, jo ielidoshu ar laikiem, bet es labpraat > piedaliitos :) > ashaas idejas. taa kaa teema - pashvaldiibas, vajadzeetu taas arii > iesaistiit. laika nav, bet tomeer. > > taatad, vajadzeetu meegjnaat sazinaaties ar pashvaldiibaam, ar kuraam jau > liidz shim bijushi kaadi pusliidz pozitiivi kontakti un/vai kur dziivo osm > aktiivisti. > sho pashvaldiibu paarstaavjus vajadzeetu uzaicinaat uz konferenci un > ideaalaa gadiijumaa - izveikt vien' maz' intervij' par to, ko shiis > pashvaldiibas dara, ja vajag izlikt publiskas kartes tuuristiem, ko dara > vieteejie uznjeemeeji, ja vajag izdrukaat kaadu karti vai ielikt > maajaslapaa... nu taadas piezemeetas teemas. > veel labaak, ja varam paspeet eksprestempaa sabiidiit kaadu sadarbiibu (vai > taas soliijumu :) ), kursh tad tiktu paslaveets konferencee ;) > > par konkreetaam pashvaldiibaam... parunaashos liigatnes virzienaa, varbuut > inchukalna virzienaa. varbuut kaads var siguldaa/ogree vai kur citur > aprunaaties. domaaju, ka dundagaa noteikti vareetu buut kaada interese ;) > > no ceesiim (pasen gan jau) sakariigu atbildi sanjeemu no ditas trapencieres > - ja vien kaadam vinja nav personigi paziistama, vareetu atkal patrauceet > bish :) > > kaadas pashvaldiibas veel mums "sirdii tuvaakas" ? > > nezinu, cik interesantas shiis detaljas ir lielaakajai daljai listes > daliibnieku - ja traucee, interesenti par shaadu inciatiivu var pavaakties > malinjaa, protams :) > jebkuraa gadiijumaa mani var meegjinaat atrast ieksh OFTC/#osm-lv parasti > arii, visbiezhaak gan mees tur ar peeci komuniceejam ;> > > Viesturs >> >> 2010. gada 17. decembris 11:29 Rich > > rakst?ja: >> >> >> kaa tur ar sho pasaakumu, notiks vispaar ? >> wiki lapaa neko jaunu nemana, decembris tuuliit beigsies. ja >> pasaakums ir janvaarii, tad tas ir diezgan... tuuliit. taa jau >> cilveeki buus saplaanojushi to laiku. >> -- >> Rich >> > ... > -- > Rich > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From richlv at nakts.net Sun Jan 2 20:37:21 2011 From: richlv at nakts.net (Rich) Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 22:37:21 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?T1NNIHLEq2tp?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4D20E201.2030508@nakts.net> On 12/30/10 15:40, J?nis Ro??ns wrote: > Labdien! > > Man ir doma nomain?t mapi sen tais?t? lap? http://lans-kapnes.lv/ uz > OSM. Re?li tur tagad ir vienk?r?i shematisks z?m?jums > K?dam jau ir pieredze? esmu taisiijis prastu openlayers html embedded karti ar custom markjieri (citaa vaardaa - vienkaarshi citu png ;) ) prieksh manis kaa nekodera - elementaari. pamataa info njeemu no http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenLayers_Marker_Example veelaak arii http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Openlayers_POI_layer_example uztaisiiju, bet man tie popupi reaali nepatika - tev gan tas laikam nebuus nemaz vajadziigs > J?nis. -- Rich From richlv at nakts.net Sun Jan 2 20:39:59 2011 From: richlv at nakts.net (Rich) Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 22:39:59 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] latas konference In-Reply-To: References: <4D0B2D63.4030404@nakts.net> <4D175FA5.9060603@nakts.net> Message-ID: <4D20E29F.5050609@nakts.net> On 01/02/11 19:59, Viesturs Zarins wrote: > Sveiks! > > Es te s?ku galv? uzmest fin?lo lekcijas formu konferencei. > Vai esi ko labu sadar?jis? esmu pabikstiijis vairaakas pashvaldiibas, ir taads high-level apraksts "kaapeec osm ir kruta" latviski un ir dazhas idejas par "must-have" prezentaacijas saturu :) buutu labi kaadu interaktiivaaku sarunu par sho teemu noorganizeet - kaadi varianti ? > Viesturs. > > 2010/12/26 Rich > > > On 12/17/10 15:36, Viesturs Zarins wrote: > > Sveiks! > > Ir apstiprin?ts datums - 18 janv?ris, uzst??an?s vieta rezerv?ta, > j?gatavo saturs. > > > es varbuut shito nozheeloshu, jo ielidoshu ar laikiem, bet es > labpraat piedaliitos :) > ashaas idejas. taa kaa teema - pashvaldiibas, vajadzeetu taas arii > iesaistiit. laika nav, bet tomeer. > > taatad, vajadzeetu meegjnaat sazinaaties ar pashvaldiibaam, ar > kuraam jau liidz shim bijushi kaadi pusliidz pozitiivi kontakti > un/vai kur dziivo osm aktiivisti. > sho pashvaldiibu paarstaavjus vajadzeetu uzaicinaat uz konferenci un > ideaalaa gadiijumaa - izveikt vien' maz' intervij' par to, ko shiis > pashvaldiibas dara, ja vajag izlikt publiskas kartes tuuristiem, ko > dara vieteejie uznjeemeeji, ja vajag izdrukaat kaadu karti vai > ielikt maajaslapaa... nu taadas piezemeetas teemas. > veel labaak, ja varam paspeet eksprestempaa sabiidiit kaadu > sadarbiibu (vai taas soliijumu :) ), kursh tad tiktu paslaveets > konferencee ;) > > par konkreetaam pashvaldiibaam... parunaashos liigatnes virzienaa, > varbuut inchukalna virzienaa. varbuut kaads var siguldaa/ogree vai > kur citur aprunaaties. domaaju, ka dundagaa noteikti vareetu buut > kaada interese ;) > > no ceesiim (pasen gan jau) sakariigu atbildi sanjeemu no ditas > trapencieres - ja vien kaadam vinja nav personigi paziistama, > vareetu atkal patrauceet bish :) > > kaadas pashvaldiibas veel mums "sirdii tuvaakas" ? > > nezinu, cik interesantas shiis detaljas ir lielaakajai daljai listes > daliibnieku - ja traucee, interesenti par shaadu inciatiivu var > pavaakties malinjaa, protams :) > jebkuraa gadiijumaa mani var meegjinaat atrast ieksh OFTC/#osm-lv > parasti arii, visbiezhaak gan mees tur ar peeci komuniceejam ;> > > Viesturs > > 2010. gada 17. decembris 11:29 Rich > >> rakst?ja: > > > kaa tur ar sho pasaakumu, notiks vispaar ? > wiki lapaa neko jaunu nemana, decembris tuuliit beigsies. ja > pasaakums ir janvaarii, tad tas ir diezgan... tuuliit. taa jau > cilveeki buus saplaanojushi to laiku. > -- > Rich > > ... > -- > Rich -- Rich From richlv at nakts.net Sun Jan 2 20:43:35 2011 From: richlv at nakts.net (Rich) Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 22:43:35 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] latas konference In-Reply-To: References: <4D0B2D63.4030404@nakts.net> <4D175FA5.9060603@nakts.net> Message-ID: <4D20E377.4040203@nakts.net> On 01/02/11 19:59, Viesturs Zarins wrote: > Sveiks! aa, piemirsu. varbuut jaaieliek konference ieksh http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Current_events ? -- Rich From polis.gints at gmail.com Mon Jan 3 05:27:39 2011 From: polis.gints at gmail.com (Gints Polis) Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 07:27:39 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?T1NNIHLEq2tp?= In-Reply-To: <4D20E201.2030508@nakts.net> References: <4D20E201.2030508@nakts.net> Message-ID: <5DF66CCE-F370-4E16-9251-E53C2DF3F730@gmail.com> Man ir prec?zi t?da pati pieredze. Ar? par popupiem. Bet.... Var v?l m??in?t izmantot cloudmade api. Gints On 2011. gada 2. janv., at 22:37, Rich wrote: > On 12/30/10 15:40, J?nis Ro??ns wrote: >> Labdien! >> >> Man ir doma nomain?t mapi sen tais?t? lap? http://lans-kapnes.lv/ uz >> OSM. Re?li tur tagad ir vienk?r?i shematisks z?m?jums >> K?dam jau ir pieredze? > > esmu taisiijis prastu openlayers html embedded karti ar custom markjieri (citaa vaardaa - vienkaarshi citu png ;) ) > prieksh manis kaa nekodera - elementaari. > > pamataa info njeemu no http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenLayers_Marker_Example > > veelaak arii http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Openlayers_POI_layer_example uztaisiiju, bet man tie popupi reaali nepatika - tev gan tas laikam nebuus nemaz vajadziigs > >> J?nis. > -- > Rich > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv From peteris.bruns at gmail.com Mon Jan 3 12:52:19 2011 From: peteris.bruns at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?UMSTdGVyaXMgQnLFq25z?=) Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 14:52:19 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?q?me=C5=BEa_teritoriju_tago=C5=A1ana?= Message-ID: <4D21C683.6000405@gmail.com> Laba diena! Cik pap?t?ju visur me?u teritorijas tiek tagotas pamat? k? landuse:forest, rodas jaut?jums par nedaudz detaliz?t?kas inform?cijas att?lo?ana osm. K? paliek ar izcirtumiem, jaunaudz?m un skrajme?iem - visi ?ie gad?jumi p?c savas b?t?bas klasific?jas k? landuse:forest. Teritoriju pl?nos ?? inform?cija ir sastopama. Jaunaud?u un izcirtumu dati katr? gad?jum? ir izv?rt?jami, bet b?tu for?i ?adu inform?ciju nezaud?t, jo noder k? labi orentieri. Vai un k?di tagi tiek lietoti: -jaunaudze -izcirtums -skrajme?s -aug?ud?rzi -- pb From richlv at nakts.net Mon Jan 3 13:41:52 2011 From: richlv at nakts.net (Rich) Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 15:41:52 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?q?me=C5=BEa_teritoriju_tago=C5=A1ana?= In-Reply-To: <4D21C683.6000405@gmail.com> References: <4D21C683.6000405@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4D21D220.8050901@nakts.net> On 01/03/11 14:52, P?teris Br?ns wrote: > Laba diena! > > Cik pap?t?ju visur me?u teritorijas tiek tagotas pamat? k? > landuse:forest, rodas jaut?jums par nedaudz detaliz?t?kas inform?cijas > att?lo?ana osm. K? paliek ar izcirtumiem, jaunaudz?m un skrajme?iem - > visi ?ie gad?jumi p?c savas b?t?bas klasific?jas k? landuse:forest. > Teritoriju pl?nos ?? inform?cija ir sastopama. Jaunaud?u un izcirtumu > dati katr? gad?jum? ir izv?rt?jami, bet b?tu for?i ?adu inform?ciju > nezaud?t, jo noder k? labi orentieri. > Vai un k?di tagi tiek lietoti: > -jaunaudze > -izcirtums shie vareetu buut gruuti uzturami - situaacija shajaa zinjaa var pietiekami strauji mainiities, un visos mezhos shos datus atjaunot... > -skrajme?s > -aug?ud?rzi http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dorchard > -- > pb -- Rich From polis.gints at gmail.com Mon Jan 3 15:30:30 2011 From: polis.gints at gmail.com (Gints Polis) Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 17:30:30 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?iso-8859-13?q?me=FEa_teritoriju_tago=F0ana?= In-Reply-To: <4D21D220.8050901@nakts.net> References: <4D21C683.6000405@gmail.com> <4D21D220.8050901@nakts.net> Message-ID: Nu elektrol?nij?m izcirtums ir diezgan parasta lieta... un parasti tas ir ?oti stabils pas?kums :). Gints 2011. gada 3. janv?ris 15:41 Rich rakst?ja: > On 01/03/11 14:52, P?teris Br?ns wrote: > >> Laba diena! >> >> Cik pap?t?ju visur me?u teritorijas tiek tagotas pamat? k? >> landuse:forest, rodas jaut?jums par nedaudz detaliz?t?kas inform?cijas >> att?lo?ana osm. K? paliek ar izcirtumiem, jaunaudz?m un skrajme?iem - >> visi ?ie gad?jumi p?c savas b?t?bas klasific?jas k? landuse:forest. >> Teritoriju pl?nos ?? inform?cija ir sastopama. Jaunaud?u un izcirtumu >> dati katr? gad?jum? ir izv?rt?jami, bet b?tu for?i ?adu inform?ciju >> nezaud?t, jo noder k? labi orentieri. >> Vai un k?di tagi tiek lietoti: >> -jaunaudze >> -izcirtums >> > > shie vareetu buut gruuti uzturami - situaacija shajaa zinjaa var pietiekami > strauji mainiities, un visos mezhos shos datus atjaunot... > > -skrajme?s >> -aug?ud?rzi >> > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dorchard > > -- >> pb >> > -- > Rich > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From peteris.bruns at gmail.com Mon Jan 3 16:40:21 2011 From: peteris.bruns at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?UMSTdGVyaXMgQnLFq25z?=) Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 18:40:21 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?q?me=C5=BEa_teritoriju_tago=C5=A1ana?= In-Reply-To: References: <4D21C683.6000405@gmail.com> <4D21D220.8050901@nakts.net> Message-ID: Par aug?ud?rzu danke! Ja ?am p?c t?das jaukas gr?mati?as k? "Apz?m?jumi topogr?fiskajai kartei m?rog? 1:10000" (izdevusi LR Valsts Zemes Dienesta Kartogr?fijas p?rvalde t?laj? 2000.gad?, gan jau ir jaun?ks izdevums) tad: Skrajme?s - kokaudzes ar koku vid?jo austumu maz?ku par 6m, kuras aug p?rpurvot?s viet?s ar koku aug?anai nelabv?ligiem apst?k?iem. Kokiem raktur?gi tievi stumbri utt. padomju topen?s ??d?m viet?m m?dz b?t uz kartes pierakst?ts kl?t *????.* no v?rda ??????. Jaunaudze-kokaudze ar vid?jo koka augstumu zem 4m (+/- garums, kuru koki saniedz ~ 10-20 gados, atkar?gs no sugas). Izcirtums- nu ?it?s teritorijas var?tu diezgan dro?i apz?m?t ar jaunaudzi, jo me?s j?atjauno diezgan ?tri un izcirtuma dz?ves cikls var?tu b?t vien k?di 2 gadi. Iz??mums protams ir Ginta min?t? situ?cija. Situ?cija main?s diezgan strauji visos datu sl??os un viet?s, ?pa?i piepils?t?s ;) Taisn?ba - uztur??ana ir probl?ma un par to ir j?dom?. Priek?! -- pb 2011/1/3 Gints Polis > Nu elektrol?nij?m izcirtums ir diezgan parasta lieta... un parasti tas ir > ?oti stabils pas?kums :). > > Gints > > 2011. gada 3. janv?ris 15:41 Rich rakst?ja: > >> On 01/03/11 14:52, P?teris Br?ns wrote: >> >>> Laba diena! >>> >>> Cik pap?t?ju visur me?u teritorijas tiek tagotas pamat? k? >>> landuse:forest, rodas jaut?jums par nedaudz detaliz?t?kas inform?cijas >>> att?lo?ana osm. K? paliek ar izcirtumiem, jaunaudz?m un skrajme?iem - >>> visi ?ie gad?jumi p?c savas b?t?bas klasific?jas k? landuse:forest. >>> Teritoriju pl?nos ?? inform?cija ir sastopama. Jaunaud?u un izcirtumu >>> dati katr? gad?jum? ir izv?rt?jami, bet b?tu for?i ?adu inform?ciju >>> nezaud?t, jo noder k? labi orentieri. >>> Vai un k?di tagi tiek lietoti: >>> -jaunaudze >>> -izcirtums >>> >> >> shie vareetu buut gruuti uzturami - situaacija shajaa zinjaa var >> pietiekami strauji mainiities, un visos mezhos shos datus atjaunot... >> >> -skrajme?s >>> -aug?ud?rzi >>> >> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dorchard >> >> -- >>> pb >>> >> -- >> Rich >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-lv mailing list >> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >> > > -- pb -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Zkir at Zkir.ru Fri Jan 7 15:13:09 2011 From: Zkir at Zkir.ru (=?koi8-r?B?68nSyczMICJaa2lyIiBCb25kYXJlbmtv?=) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 18:13:09 +0300 Subject: [Talk-lv] OSM map Latvia for CityGuide navigation program Message-ID: <18175D40DB4D42279385BE578F052312@Kirs2> Hi guys! I have a message that can be interesting for you. There is a possibility to introduce traffic service on OSM map of Latvia for CityGuide navigation program. But for that I need some persons who will provide quality control and monitor road situation (turn restrictions e.t.c) Official site of CityGuide program: http://probki.net/ Latvian CityGuide project: http://www.mapriga.com/ OSM map for CityGuide: http://peirce.gis-lab.info/misc.php Best regards, ?irill aka Zkir ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ ???? ??????, ? ?????, ??? ??? ????? ??????????????. ???? ?????????????? ??????????? ?????????? ?????? ?? ????? ?????? ??? ????????. ?? ??? ????? ????? ???????, ?.?. ??, ??? ????? ?????????? ????????? ???????? ? ???????? ???????????. http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Zkir/diary/12738 ???? ????????: http://probki.net/ ???? ??????????? ???????: http://www.mapriga.com/ C??? osm-????? ?????? ?????: http://peirce.gis-lab.info/misc.php ? ?????????, ?????? aka Zkir -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From richlv at nakts.net Fri Jan 7 15:23:30 2011 From: richlv at nakts.net (Rich) Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 17:23:30 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] OSM map Latvia for CityGuide navigation program In-Reply-To: <18175D40DB4D42279385BE578F052312@Kirs2> References: <18175D40DB4D42279385BE578F052312@Kirs2> Message-ID: <4D272FF2.1010905@nakts.net> On 01/07/11 17:13, ?????? "Zkir" Bondarenko wrote: > Hi guys! > > I have a message that can be interesting for you. > > There is a possibility to introduce traffic service on OSM map of Latvia > for CityGuide navigation program. > > But for that I need some persons who will provide quality control and > monitor road situation (turn restrictions e.t.c) hi and thanks for the offer. do you have any information on what quality control & road situation monitoring usually involves ? i personally have been trying to use osm data for navigation for a while, and in the process i have fixed/added quite some oneway, turn restriction and other data that is quite crucial for navigation, so i'm interested in such developments. for navigation, i use gpsmid - while having drawbacks, it mostly works. and it matches osm well, being opensource itself :) > Official site of CityGuide program: http://probki.net/ > > Latvian CityGuide project: http://www.mapriga.com/ > OSM map for CityGuide: http://peirce.gis-lab.info/misc.php > > Best regards, > ?irill aka Zkir > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ???? ??????, > ? ?????, ??? ??? ????? ??????????????. > > ???? ?????????????? ??????????? ?????????? ?????? ?? ????? ?????? ??? > ????????. ?? ??? ????? ????? ???????, ?.?. ??, ??? ????? ?????????? > ????????? ???????? ? ???????? ???????????. > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Zkir/diary/12738 > ???? ????????: http://probki.net/ > ???? ??????????? ???????: http://www.mapriga.com/ > C??? osm-????? ?????? ?????: http://peirce.gis-lab.info/misc.php > > ? ?????????, > > ?????? aka Zkir -- Rich From Zkir at Zkir.ru Fri Jan 7 16:57:04 2011 From: Zkir at Zkir.ru (=?koi8-r?B?68nSyczMICJaa2lyIiBCb25kYXJlbmtv?=) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 19:57:04 +0300 Subject: [Talk-lv] OSM map Latvia for CityGuide navigation program In-Reply-To: <4D272FF2.1010905@nakts.net> References: <18175D40DB4D42279385BE578F052312@Kirs2> <4D272FF2.1010905@nakts.net> Message-ID: <24AB8CC5D57E44EA82E5B530E25FDDE7@Kirs2> Hi! The following is required: 1. I now have *daily* builds of OSM maps into CitiGuide format (dcm) (see the link below). These builds should be tested and good ones should be released for general public (As you know, osm maps are subject to newbie edits and even vandalism). Approximately one release per month is planned. 2. Once map is released, it is connected to the traffic service and on-line corrections. (in CityGuide there is a possibility of online corrections, if a navigation device has connection to internet, it can get corrections of turn restrictions, oneways and speed indexes on-line, without downloading new map). So the person is needed who will manage such online corrections basing on the user reports. P.S. The free version of the CityGuide for Windows is available: http://www.probki.net/Programs/desktop.asp (gps is turned off in the free version) ? ?????????, ?????? aka Zkir -----Original Message----- From: Rich [mailto:taaarp at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rich Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 6:24 PM To: "?????? \"Zkir\" Bondarenko" Cc: talk-lv at openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-lv] OSM map Latvia for CityGuide navigation program On 01/07/11 17:13, ?????? "Zkir" Bondarenko wrote: > Hi guys! > > I have a message that can be interesting for you. > > There is a possibility to introduce traffic service on OSM map of Latvia > for CityGuide navigation program. > > But for that I need some persons who will provide quality control and > monitor road situation (turn restrictions e.t.c) hi and thanks for the offer. do you have any information on what quality control & road situation monitoring usually involves ? i personally have been trying to use osm data for navigation for a while, and in the process i have fixed/added quite some oneway, turn restriction and other data that is quite crucial for navigation, so i'm interested in such developments. for navigation, i use gpsmid - while having drawbacks, it mostly works. and it matches osm well, being opensource itself :) > Official site of CityGuide program: http://probki.net/ > > Latvian CityGuide project: http://www.mapriga.com/ > OSM map for CityGuide: http://peirce.gis-lab.info/misc.php > > Best regards, > ?irill aka Zkir > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ > > ???? ??????, > ? ?????, ??? ??? ????? ??????????????. > > ???? ?????????????? ??????????? ?????????? ?????? ?? ????? ?????? ??? > ????????. ?? ??? ????? ????? ???????, ?.?. ??, ??? ????? ?????????? > ????????? ???????? ? ???????? ???????????. > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Zkir/diary/12738 > ???? ????????: http://probki.net/ > ???? ??????????? ???????: http://www.mapriga.com/ > C??? osm-????? ?????? ?????: http://peirce.gis-lab.info/misc.php > > ? ?????????, > > ?????? aka Zkir -- Rich From viesturz at gmail.com Sat Jan 8 08:08:59 2011 From: viesturz at gmail.com (Viesturs Zarins) Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 10:08:59 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] OSM map Latvia for CityGuide navigation program In-Reply-To: <24AB8CC5D57E44EA82E5B530E25FDDE7@Kirs2> References: <18175D40DB4D42279385BE578F052312@Kirs2> <4D272FF2.1010905@nakts.net> <24AB8CC5D57E44EA82E5B530E25FDDE7@Kirs2> Message-ID: Hi! Can you please show some cities/countries in CityGuide already using OpenStreetMap data? I don't see any references to OpenStreetMap in the probki.net site. I suppose you know that using OpenStreetMap data requires attribution and share-alike. Cheers, Viesturs 2011/1/7 ?????? "Zkir" Bondarenko > Hi! > > The following is required: > 1. I now have *daily* builds of OSM maps into CitiGuide format (dcm) (see > the link below). > > These builds should be tested and good ones should be released for general > public (As you know, osm maps are subject to newbie edits and even > vandalism). Approximately one release per month is planned. > > > 2. Once map is released, it is connected to the traffic service and on-line > corrections. (in CityGuide there is a possibility of online corrections, if > a navigation device has connection to internet, it can get corrections of > turn restrictions, oneways and speed indexes on-line, without downloading > new map). So the person is needed who will manage such online corrections > basing on the user reports. > > P.S. > The free version of the CityGuide for Windows is available: > http://www.probki.net/Programs/desktop.asp > (gps is turned off in the free version) > > > ? ?????????, > > ?????? aka Zkir > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rich [mailto:taaarp at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rich > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 6:24 PM > To: "?????? \"Zkir\" Bondarenko" > Cc: talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [Talk-lv] OSM map Latvia for CityGuide navigation program > > On 01/07/11 17:13, ?????? "Zkir" Bondarenko wrote: > > Hi guys! > > > > I have a message that can be interesting for you. > > > > There is a possibility to introduce traffic service on OSM map of Latvia > > for CityGuide navigation program. > > > > But for that I need some persons who will provide quality control and > > monitor road situation (turn restrictions e.t.c) > > hi and thanks for the offer. do you have any information on what quality > control & road situation monitoring usually involves ? > > i personally have been trying to use osm data for navigation for a > while, and in the process i have fixed/added quite some oneway, turn > restriction and other data that is quite crucial for navigation, so i'm > interested in such developments. > > for navigation, i use gpsmid - while having drawbacks, it mostly works. > and it matches osm well, being opensource itself :) > > > Official site of CityGuide program: http://probki.net/ > > > > Latvian CityGuide project: http://www.mapriga.com/ > > OSM map for CityGuide: http://peirce.gis-lab.info/misc.php > > > > Best regards, > > ?irill aka Zkir > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ------------------------------------ > > > > ???? ??????, > > ? ?????, ??? ??? ????? ??????????????. > > > > ???? ?????????????? ??????????? ?????????? ?????? ?? ????? ?????? ??? > > ????????. ?? ??? ????? ????? ???????, ?.?. ??, ??? ????? ?????????? > > ????????? ???????? ? ???????? ???????????. > > > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Zkir/diary/12738 > > ???? ????????: http://probki.net/ > > ???? ??????????? ???????: http://www.mapriga.com/ > > C??? osm-????? ?????? ?????: http://peirce.gis-lab.info/misc.php > > > > ? ?????????, > > > > ?????? aka Zkir > -- > Rich > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Zkir at Zkir.ru Fri Jan 7 14:58:29 2011 From: Zkir at Zkir.ru (=?koi8-r?B?68nSyczMICJaa2lyIiBCb25kYXJlbmtv?=) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 17:58:29 +0300 Subject: [Talk-lv] OSM map Latvia for CityGuide navigation program Message-ID: Hi guys! I have a message that can be interesting for you. There is a possibility to introduce traffic service on OSM map of Latvia for CityGuide navigation program. But for that I need some persons who will provide quality control and monitor road situation (turn restrictions e.t.c) Official site of CityGuide program: http://probki.net/ Latvian CityGuide project: http://www.mapriga.com/ OSM map for CityGuide: http://peirce.gis-lab.info/misc.php Best regards, ?irill aka Zkir ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ ???? ??????, ? ?????, ??? ??? ????? ??????????????. ???? ?????????????? ??????????? ?????????? ?????? ?? ????? ?????? ??? ????????. ?? ??? ????? ????? ???????, ?.?. ??, ??? ????? ?????????? ????????? ???????? ? ???????? ???????????. http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Zkir/diary/12738 ???? ????????: http://probki.net/ ???? ??????????? ???????: http://www.mapriga.com/ C??? osm-????? ?????? ?????: http://peirce.gis-lab.info/misc.php ? ?????????, ?????? aka Zkir -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Zkir at Zkir.ru Sat Jan 8 10:00:10 2011 From: Zkir at Zkir.ru (=?koi8-r?B?68nSyczMICJaa2lyIiBCb25kYXJlbmtv?=) Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 13:00:10 +0300 Subject: [Talk-lv] OSM map Latvia for CityGuide navigation program In-Reply-To: References: <18175D40DB4D42279385BE578F052312@Kirs2> <4D272FF2.1010905@nakts.net> <24AB8CC5D57E44EA82E5B530E25FDDE7@Kirs2> Message-ID: <199475DF1E104F69AE15F5F929A6FEA0@Kirs2> Hi, Openstreetmap-based maps for CityGuide of Eastern and Northern Europe are available here: http://peirce.gis-lab.info/misc.php Maps that are present now on probki.net site ("official" maps) are not based on OSM data. ? ?????????, ?????? aka Zkir _____ From: Viesturs Zarins [mailto:viesturz at gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 11:09 AM To: ?????? Zkir Bondarenko Cc: Rich; talk-lv at openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-lv] OSM map Latvia for CityGuide navigation program Hi! Can you please show some cities/countries in CityGuide already using OpenStreetMap data? I don't see any references to OpenStreetMap in the probki.net site. I suppose you know that using OpenStreetMap data requires attribution and share-alike. Cheers, Viesturs 2011/1/7 ?????? "Zkir" Bondarenko Hi! The following is required: 1. I now have *daily* builds of OSM maps into CitiGuide format (dcm) (see the link below). These builds should be tested and good ones should be released for general public (As you know, osm maps are subject to newbie edits and even vandalism). Approximately one release per month is planned. 2. Once map is released, it is connected to the traffic service and on-line corrections. (in CityGuide there is a possibility of online corrections, if a navigation device has connection to internet, it can get corrections of turn restrictions, oneways and speed indexes on-line, without downloading new map). So the person is needed who will manage such online corrections basing on the user reports. P.S. The free version of the CityGuide for Windows is available: http://www.probki.net/Programs/desktop.asp (gps is turned off in the free version) ? ?????????, ?????? aka Zkir -----Original Message----- From: Rich [mailto:taaarp at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rich Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 6:24 PM To: "?????? \"Zkir\" Bondarenko" Cc: talk-lv at openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-lv] OSM map Latvia for CityGuide navigation program On 01/07/11 17:13, ?????? "Zkir" Bondarenko wrote: > Hi guys! > > I have a message that can be interesting for you. > > There is a possibility to introduce traffic service on OSM map of Latvia > for CityGuide navigation program. > > But for that I need some persons who will provide quality control and > monitor road situation (turn restrictions e.t.c) hi and thanks for the offer. do you have any information on what quality control & road situation monitoring usually involves ? i personally have been trying to use osm data for navigation for a while, and in the process i have fixed/added quite some oneway, turn restriction and other data that is quite crucial for navigation, so i'm interested in such developments. for navigation, i use gpsmid - while having drawbacks, it mostly works. and it matches osm well, being opensource itself :) > Official site of CityGuide program: http://probki.net/ > > Latvian CityGuide project: http://www.mapriga.com/ > OSM map for CityGuide: http://peirce.gis-lab.info/misc.php > > Best regards, > ?irill aka Zkir > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ > > ???? ??????, > ? ?????, ??? ??? ????? ??????????????. > > ???? ?????????????? ??????????? ?????????? ?????? ?? ????? ?????? ??? > ????????. ?? ??? ????? ????? ???????, ?.?. ??, ??? ????? ?????????? > ????????? ???????? ? ???????? ???????????. > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Zkir/diary/12738 > ???? ????????: http://probki.net/ > ???? ??????????? ???????: http://www.mapriga.com/ > C??? osm-????? ?????? ?????: http://peirce.gis-lab.info/misc.php > > ? ?????????, > > ?????? aka Zkir -- Rich _______________________________________________ Talk-lv mailing list Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From richlv at nakts.net Mon Jan 10 15:52:50 2011 From: richlv at nakts.net (Rich) Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:52:50 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] access=destination vietaam riigaa Message-ID: <4D2B2B52.8060705@nakts.net> riigaa shur tur paraadiijushies access=destination tagi, piemeeram, sheit : http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=56.99827&lon=24.28191&zoom=17&layers=M access=destination principaa noziimee aizliegumu braukt, ja vien tas nav vieniigais piebraucamais celjsh - principaa "caurbraukt aizliegts" ziime (baltaa pljeka :) ) apluukoju dabaa, no bergju ielas puses tur nekaadu ierobezhojoshu ziimju nav. no kurienes shaads tags ? veel shaubiiga vieta : http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=56.941531&lon=24.124074&zoom=18&layers=M vai tieshaam tur ir caurbrauktaizliegts ziimes ? -- Rich From janis.rocans at gmail.com Mon Jan 10 16:04:35 2011 From: janis.rocans at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?SsSBbmlzIFJvxI3EgW5z?=) Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:04:35 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] access=destination vietaam riigaa In-Reply-To: <4D2B2B52.8060705@nakts.net> References: <4D2B2B52.8060705@nakts.net> Message-ID: Edited by extropy_terplans at 2010-12-27T14:59:35Z Kaut k?di importi? On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Rich wrote: > riigaa shur tur paraadiijushies access=destination tagi, piemeeram, sheit : > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=56.99827&lon=24.28191&zoom=17&layers=M > > access=destination principaa noziimee aizliegumu braukt, ja vien tas nav > vieniigais piebraucamais celjsh - principaa "caurbraukt aizliegts" ziime > (baltaa pljeka :) ) > > apluukoju dabaa, no bergju ielas puses tur nekaadu ierobezhojoshu ziimju > nav. no kurienes shaads tags ? > > veel shaubiiga vieta : > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=56.941531&lon=24.124074&zoom=18&layers=M > > vai tieshaam tur ir caurbrauktaizliegts ziimes ? > -- > Rich > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From viesturz at gmail.com Mon Jan 10 17:15:43 2011 From: viesturz at gmail.com (Viesturs Zarins) Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 19:15:43 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] access=destination vietaam riigaa In-Reply-To: References: <4D2B2B52.8060705@nakts.net> Message-ID: Pirmaja linka ir gan balta pleka no Depo puses braucot, tipa savadak tur tauta tranzita brauc, lai tiktu no Depo uz Rigu. Par otro gan nezinu. Viesturs On 10 Jan 2011 18:04, "J?nis Ro??ns" wrote: > Edited by extropy_terplans at 2010-12-27T14:59:35Z > Kaut k?di importi? > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Rich wrote: > >> riigaa shur tur paraadiijushies access=destination tagi, piemeeram, sheit : >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=56.99827&lon=24.28191&zoom=17&layers=M >> >> access=destination principaa noziimee aizliegumu braukt, ja vien tas nav >> vieniigais piebraucamais celjsh - principaa "caurbraukt aizliegts" ziime >> (baltaa pljeka :) ) >> >> apluukoju dabaa, no bergju ielas puses tur nekaadu ierobezhojoshu ziimju >> nav. no kurienes shaads tags ? >> >> veel shaubiiga vieta : >> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=56.941531&lon=24.124074&zoom=18&layers=M >> >> vai tieshaam tur ir caurbrauktaizliegts ziimes ? >> -- >> Rich >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-lv mailing list >> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stendec at inbox.lv Tue Jan 11 07:25:13 2011 From: stendec at inbox.lv (Edgars Burmistris) Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:25:13 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] access=destination vietaam riigaa In-Reply-To: References: <4D2B2B52.8060705@nakts.net> Message-ID: <1294730713.4d2c05d9b18d2@mail.inbox.lv> Otraj? ir divas p?akas, piekam elijas iela pie viesn?cas, kur atm un Jbazn?cas iela no daugavas puses ir deadend pie ap?a, t? k? tur k?ds var?tu uzlikt k?du aizliegumu ka pa t?m div?m iebrauktuv?m nav iesp?jams iebraukt apl?! Cit?jot *Viesturs Zarins *: > > > Pirmaja linka ir gan balta pleka no Depo puses braucot,  tipa > savadak tur tauta tranzita brauc,  lai tiktu no Depo uz Rigu. > > Par otro gan nezinu. > > Viesturs On 10 Jan 2011 18:04, "J?nis Ro??ns" > wrote: > > Edited by extropy_terplans at 2010-12-27T14:59:35Z > > Kaut k?di importi? > > > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Rich > wrote: > > > >> riigaa shur tur paraadiijushies access=destination tagi, > piemeeram, sheit : > >> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=56.99827&lon=24.28191&zoom=17&layers=M > [1] > >> > >> access=destination principaa noziimee aizliegumu braukt, > ja vien tas nav > >> vieniigais piebraucamais celjsh - principaa "caurbraukt > aizliegts" ziime > >> (baltaa pljeka :) ) > >> > >> apluukoju dabaa, no bergju ielas puses tur nekaadu > ierobezhojoshu ziimju > >> nav. no kurienes shaads tags ? > >> > >> veel shaubiiga vieta : > >> > >> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=56.941531&lon=24.124074&zoom=18&layers=M > [2] > >> > >> vai tieshaam tur ir caurbrauktaizliegts ziimes ? > >> -- > >> Rich > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Talk-lv mailing list > >> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv [3] > >>   Links: ------ [1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=56.99827&lon=24.28191&zoom=17&layers=M [2] http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=56.941531&lon=24.124074&zoom=18&layers=M [3] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From richlv at nakts.net Tue Jan 11 07:54:14 2011 From: richlv at nakts.net (Rich) Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:54:14 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] access=destination vietaam riigaa In-Reply-To: References: <4D2B2B52.8060705@nakts.net> Message-ID: <4D2C0CA6.6060105@nakts.net> On 01/10/11 19:15, Viesturs Zarins wrote: > Pirmaja linka ir gan balta pleka no Depo puses braucot, tipa savadak > tur tauta tranzita brauc, lai tiktu no Depo uz Rigu. huh, buus jaapaskataas. no bergju ielas puses tochna nav, ja nu vieniigi kaut kur taalaak pa rozheni... > Par otro gan nezinu. > > Viesturs ... -- Rich From instigater at projektam.lv Tue Jan 11 08:59:33 2011 From: instigater at projektam.lv (Instigater) Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:59:33 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?q?K=C4=81_ar_datu_legalit=C4=81ti_no_Latviajs_J?= =?utf-8?b?xatyYXMgYWRtaW5pc3RyxIFjaWphcz8=?= Message-ID: <4D2C1BF5.9000105@projektam.lv> http://www.lhd.lv/LJA/userfiles/file/Ugunis_un_Zimes/list_of_atons.pdf Vismaz p?c satura, man liekas, ka ?iem vajadz?tu b?t publiski br?vi lietojamiem. -- Instigater Serveru noma Latvenergo datu centr? - s?kot no 10.50 Ls/m?n www.projektam.lv From janis.rocans at gmail.com Tue Jan 11 09:08:39 2011 From: janis.rocans at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-13?B?SuJuaXMgUm/o4m5z?=) Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:08:39 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?iso-8859-13?q?Maplink_render=E7t=E2js?= Message-ID: Sveiki! Paman?ju, ka Maplink render?t?js ielu nosaukumus ieliek diezgan reti, san?k, ka ielas nosaukumu atv?rt? log? var ar? neieraudz?t, ja iela ir gara. Vai nav planotas izmai?as, lai ielu nosaukumus saliktu bie??k? J?nis -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From richlv at nakts.net Tue Jan 11 09:21:17 2011 From: richlv at nakts.net (Rich) Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:21:17 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?TWFwbGluayByZW5kZXLEk3TEgWpz?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4D2C210D.8020902@nakts.net> On 01/11/11 11:08, J?nis Ro??ns wrote: > Sveiki! > Paman?ju, ka Maplink render?t?js ielu nosaukumus ieliek diezgan reti, > san?k, ka ielas nosaukumu atv?rt? log? var ar? neieraudz?t, ja iela ir > gara. Vai nav planotas izmai?as, lai ielu nosaukumus saliktu bie??k? mapnik ? :) mekleejam sheit : http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ gan jau tur ir esoshs reports. ja nu nav, var reporteet jaunu (bet es sho jau esmu kaut kur lasiijis, noteikti jaabuut jau reportam) > J?nis -- Rich From viesturz at gmail.com Tue Jan 11 15:30:57 2011 From: viesturz at gmail.com (Viesturs Zarins) Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:30:57 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?q?K=C4=81_ar_datu_legalit=C4=81ti_no_Latviajs_J?= =?utf-8?b?xatyYXMgYWRtaW5pc3RyxIFjaWphcz8=?= In-Reply-To: <4D2C1BF5.9000105@projektam.lv> References: <4D2C1BF5.9000105@projektam.lv> Message-ID: Jaatrod normativais akts, kas nosaka sita izdosanu. On 11 Jan 2011 10:59, "Instigater" wrote: > http://www.lhd.lv/LJA/userfiles/file/Ugunis_un_Zimes/list_of_atons.pdf > Vismaz p?c satura, man liekas, ka ?iem vajadz?tu b?t publiski br?vi > lietojamiem. > > -- > Instigater > Serveru noma Latvenergo datu centr? - s?kot no 10.50 Ls/m?n > www.projektam.lv > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lafriks at gmail.com Tue Jan 11 15:36:38 2011 From: lafriks at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Lauris_Buk=C5=A1is=2DHaberkorns?=) Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:36:38 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?q?K=C4=81_ar_datu_legalit=C4=81ti_no_Latviajs_J?= =?utf-8?b?xatyYXMgYWRtaW5pc3RyxIFjaWphcz8=?= In-Reply-To: References: <4D2C1BF5.9000105@projektam.lv> Message-ID: Vienk?r??k nav ar vi?iem sazin?ties un pavaic?t? Lauris 2011. gada 11. janv?ris 17:30 Viesturs Zarins rakst?ja: > Jaatrod normativais akts,? kas nosaka sita izdosanu. > > On 11 Jan 2011 10:59, "Instigater" wrote: >> http://www.lhd.lv/LJA/userfiles/file/Ugunis_un_Zimes/list_of_atons.pdf >> Vismaz p?c satura, man liekas, ka ?iem vajadz?tu b?t publiski br?vi >> lietojamiem. >> >> -- >> Instigater >> Serveru noma Latvenergo datu centr? - s?kot no 10.50 Ls/m?n >> www.projektam.lv >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-lv mailing list >> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > > From uldics at gmail.com Tue Jan 11 18:17:43 2011 From: uldics at gmail.com (uldics at gmail.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 20:17:43 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?q?K=C4=81_ar_datu_legalit=C4=81ti_no_Latviajs_J?= =?utf-8?b?xatyYXMgYWRtaW5pc3RyxIFjaWphcz8=?= In-Reply-To: <4D2C1BF5.9000105@projektam.lv> References: <4D2C1BF5.9000105@projektam.lv> Message-ID: Tur vien? no pirmaj?m lap?m ir (C) z?me. Tas nor?da, ka nav br?vi lietojams. Tas gan nenoz?m?, ka t?da z?me tur likum?gi ir. Likums, kas nosaka Latvijas j?ras administr?cijas darb?bu, saucas "J?rlietu p?rvaldes un j?ras dro??bas likums". 6. pants 16. punkts: 16) organiz? navig?cijas publik?ciju sagatavo?anu, iespie?anu un izplat??anu. Es gan dom?ju, ka organiz??ana nenoz?m?, ka vi?iem pa?iem tas j?dara, tikai j?rada sist?ma, kur? publik?cijas tiek izdotas. Bet Hidrogr?fijas dienests man? skat?jum? ar? ir valsts iest?de, kur?, ne?aubos, str?d? valsts amatpersonas. To var p?rbaud?t www.vid.gov.lv lap? pie amatpersonu deklar?cij?m. Bez Neo pal?dz?bas :) 57.pants. Navig?cijas publik?cijas un elektronisk?s kartes. Tur gan nav teikts, ka publik?cija ir dokuments. Bet, ?emot v?r? tiesisk?s attiec?bas, kas var b?t starp div?m pus?m, tad tiesa viennoz?m?gi ?ems v?r? ??s publik?cijas, tie?i t?pat k? dokumentus un likumus. Attiec?gi, es secinu, ka tie ir dokumenti. Pie tam to nepiecie?am?ba un izdo?ana, izriet no likumiem. L?dz ar to var secin?t, ka datus var izmantot, pat no j?ras kart?m. Ja k?dam jaut?jumi par ko nesaprotamu jau min?taj?, vai cit?s ar j?rniec?bu saist?t?s publik?cij?s, daudz ko varu izskaidrot. uldics -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ From uldics at gmail.com Tue Jan 11 18:19:20 2011 From: uldics at gmail.com (uldics at gmail.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 20:19:20 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?q?K=C4=81_ar_datu_legalit=C4=81ti_no_Latviajs_J?= =?utf-8?b?xatyYXMgYWRtaW5pc3RyxIFjaWphcz8=?= In-Reply-To: References: <4D2C1BF5.9000105@projektam.lv> Message-ID: On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:36:38 +0200, Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: > Vienk?r??k nav ar vi?iem sazin?ties un pavaic?t? > > Lauris > Atbilde b?s t?da pati, k? jaut?jumam, kur ?sti R?g? satiekas A ce?i, un k? kompetenc? ir tie un uz tiem attieco??s ce?az?mes :) uldics > 2011. gada 11. janv?ris 17:30 Viesturs Zarins > rakst?ja: >> Jaatrod normativais akts, kas nosaka sita izdosanu. >> >> On 11 Jan 2011 10:59, "Instigater" wrote: >>> http://www.lhd.lv/LJA/userfiles/file/Ugunis_un_Zimes/list_of_atons.pdf >>> Vismaz p?c satura, man liekas, ka ?iem vajadz?tu b?t publiski br?vi >>> lietojamiem. >>> >>> -- >>> Instigater >>> Serveru noma Latvenergo datu centr? - s?kot no 10.50 Ls/m?n >>> www.projektam.lv >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-lv mailing list >>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-lv mailing list >> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ From viesturz at gmail.com Fri Jan 14 19:35:40 2011 From: viesturz at gmail.com (Viesturs Zarins) Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 21:35:40 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] ceesis mapping party - partyrender v1 In-Reply-To: <4C6061D3.7060905@nakts.net> References: <4C3BA15F.9070305@nakts.net> <4C3BF817.8000703@nakts.net> <4C6061D3.7060905@nakts.net> Message-ID: Sveiks! Vari ats?t?t v?lraiz to partyrender bildi, lai var ielikt LATAS konferences prezent?cij?. Mo? k?dam ir smuka grupas bilde? T?du ar? der?tu. Viesturs 2010. gada 9. augusts 23:15 Rich rakst?ja: > K?rlis wrote: > >> Visp?r ir K?rlis & Gunta (& D?rta) ;) - dzeltenais treiss. >> >> J?nis Ro??ns wrote: >>> >>>> Cyan - J?nis (C?sis) & Krist?ne >>>> Green laikam J?nis (Valmiera) & Gunta >>>> >>> > beidzot tiku liidz v2 taisiishanai > http://imagebin.org/108826 > shoreiz - 2x labaakaa rezoluucijaa =) > > cerams, tagad ir tikai nelielas kljuudas... > > > hrh. taa iet, kad tur steigaa treisus kopee un apsauc :) >>> sorry par shkjiibu sapaaroshanu, izlaboshu. >>> veel laikam no kaarlja vajag papildinaajumu-precizeejumu. >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:12 AM, Rich >>> richlv at nakts.net>> wrote: >>>> da verii pirmais partyrenders. pa galvu nesist par to, ka vaardus >>>> neatcereejos, atcereeshos sliktaak. >>>> pastaastiit, kaa katrs legend ieraksts jaamaina. >>>> vispaar chakars sanaaca manaami lielaaks, saakot ar dazhaadu >>>> diivainu >>>> treisu mergoshanu, gpsbabela segfaultiem, pareizaa laika perioda >>>> graiziishanu un ko tik veel ne :) >>>> ----------------- >>>> hmm, attachs listei bija par lielu - rekur biude : >>>> http://imagebin.ca/view/mNRw_iT.html >>>> -- Rich >>>> >>> -- > Rich > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From polis.gints at gmail.com Sun Jan 16 11:07:47 2011 From: polis.gints at gmail.com (Gints Polis) Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 13:07:47 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] Iztulkot Message-ID: Ir ien?cies l?gums ?o iztulkot: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/State_Of_The_Map_Europe_2011 Ja nu k?dam ir laici??. Gints -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From richlv at nakts.net Sun Jan 16 15:37:26 2011 From: richlv at nakts.net (Rich) Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:37:26 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] 3d karte - tagad ar jumtu formaam Message-ID: <4D3310B6.6090305@nakts.net> http://amdmi3.ru/files/1.png http://amdmi3.ru/files/2.png -- Rich From uldics at gmail.com Sun Jan 16 17:13:15 2011 From: uldics at gmail.com (uldics at gmail.com) Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:13:15 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?q?Kas_tas_t=C4=81ds=3F?= Message-ID: K?dam ir idejas, kas tas ir? uldics -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ From uldics at gmail.com Sun Jan 16 17:17:07 2011 From: uldics at gmail.com (uldics at gmail.com) Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:17:07 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?q?Kas_tas_t=C4=81ds=3F?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:13:15 +0200, wrote: > K?dam ir idejas, kas tas ir? > uldics Sorr?: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=79.276&lon=96.983&zoom=11&layers=M -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ From janis.rocans at gmail.com Sun Jan 16 17:24:59 2011 From: janis.rocans at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?SsSBbmlzIFJvxI3EgW5z?=) Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:24:59 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?iso-8859-13?q?Kas_tas_t=E2ds=3F?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Ginespri 2011/1/16 > On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:13:15 +0200, wrote: > > K?dam ir idejas, kas tas ir? >> uldics >> > Sorr?: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=79.276&lon=96.983&zoom=11&layers=M > > > -- > Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cuu508 at gmail.com Sun Jan 16 20:26:15 2011 From: cuu508 at gmail.com (cuu508 at gmail.com) Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 22:26:15 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?iso-8859-13?q?Kas_tas_t=E2ds=3F?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: K?ds no??vis greizi ar koordin?t?m dro?i vien? Cik internet? uz ?tro var samekl?t, uz t?s salas taj? viet? ir led?js, ir meteorolo?isk? stacija, bet nu diez vai pils, k? p?c OSM kartes var?tu dom?t. ru wikip?dija par salu: http://is.gd/3Pfyb8 Bildes no Vavilova kupola--t? to staciju laikam sauca: http://www.ivki.ru/kapustin/stations/ussr/vavilov/vavilov.htm 2011/1/16 J?nis Ro??ns : > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Ginespri > > 2011/1/16 >> >> On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:13:15 +0200, wrote: >> >>> K?dam ir idejas, kas tas ir? >>> uldics >> >> Sorr?: >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=79.276&lon=96.983&zoom=11&layers=M >> >> -- >> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-lv mailing list >> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > > From orvils at gmail.com Tue Jan 18 15:57:12 2011 From: orvils at gmail.com (Raivis Dejus) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:57:12 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?QXR6acWGYXMgcMSTYyBWaWVzdHVyYSB1enN0xIHFoWFu?= =?utf-8?q?=C4=81s_LATA_konferenc=C4=93?= Message-ID: Sveiki biedri! P?ris atzi?as p?c Viestura uzst??an?s LATA konferenc?: 1. *Labi:* Viesturs uzst?j?s ?oti labi un p?rliecino?i, zin?ja savu lietu -> Vi?am ?? prezent?cija j?atr?da v?l kaut kur. :) 2. *Var uzlabot:* St?stot, k? cilv?ki var iesaist?ties noteikti j?st?sta par to, ka cilv?ks ar? bez GPS var p?rbaud?t sev zin?m?s vietas un sapost?t bugus, ja t?di ir (Links uz vietu kur likt bugus). K? ar? iesp?jams cilv?ki zina k?du papildus inform?ciju par kart? jau saz?m?tu vietu, ko vi?i var pievienot kartei. Piem?rs p?d?jam b?tu l?dz ?im nezin?ma kafejn?ca vai ielas nosaukums. Gaid?m n?kamo lielisko prezent?ciju :) -- Cie??, Raivis Dejus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From orvils at gmail.com Tue Jan 18 18:49:32 2011 From: orvils at gmail.com (Raivis Dejus) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 20:49:32 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?q?Inovat=C4=ABva_Latvijas_b=C5=ABvkonstrukcija?= Message-ID: Sveicin?ti! Gribu padal?ties ar visai inovat?vas Latvijas b?vkonstrukcijas atkl?jumu. Laboju kartes k??das un uzd?ros ?im: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=25.39864&lat=57.43618&zoom=17&opacity=0.80 Saite n?kamaj?m paaudz?m: http://img638.imageshack.us/img638/5059/ekranattelsosminspector.png -- Cie??, Raivis Dejus Valdes loceklis SIA World Technology Frontier Tel.: 26457260 E-pasts: raivis at wtf.lv www.wtf.lv -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From richlv at nakts.net Tue Jan 18 19:51:51 2011 From: richlv at nakts.net (Rich) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 21:51:51 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?q?Inovat=C4=ABva_Latvijas_b=C5=ABvkonstrukcija?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4D35EF57.6040804@nakts.net> On 01/18/11 20:49, Raivis Dejus wrote: > Sveicin?ti! > > Gribu padal?ties ar visai inovat?vas Latvijas b?vkonstrukcijas > atkl?jumu. Laboju kartes k??das un uzd?ros ?im: > http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=25.39864&lat=57.43618&zoom=17&opacity=0.80 > > > Saite n?kamaj?m paaudz?m: > http://img638.imageshack.us/img638/5059/ekranattelsosminspector.png pdf imports sajucis praataa ? :) > -- > Cie??, > Raivis Dejus > Valdes loceklis > SIA World Technology Frontier > > Tel.: 26457260 > E-pasts: raivis at wtf.lv > www.wtf.lv -- Rich From tfr at apollo.lv Wed Jan 19 00:13:59 2011 From: tfr at apollo.lv (tfr at apollo.lv) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 02:13:59 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?dmFqYWR6xKtnYXMgcGlsc8STdHUgcm9iZcW+YXM=?= Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From uldics at gmail.com Wed Jan 19 06:50:55 2011 From: uldics at gmail.com (uldics at gmail.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 08:50:55 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?dmFqYWR6xKtnYXMgcGlsc8STdHUgcm9iZcW+YXM=?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 02:13:59 +0200, wrote: > J? k?dam ir jaut?jumi par CityGuide navig?ciju ar prieku atbild??u. > > Ar cie?u, Toms (Intergrator) J?, ir jaut?jumi. Vi?i jau uzreiz pied?v? datus, kas ?emti no OSM? Jo m?jaslap? skaisti st?v: Software & Technology: (?1998-2005) Webnologic Internet Systems Data & Maps: (?2005) City of Kaiserslautern Nelas?ju visu lapu, uz darbu j?dodas, bet neizskat?s, ka kaut kur par OSM b?tu kas min?ts. Vai to lietot?ji pa?i liek iek?? un datu form?ts vienk?r?i net???m sakr?t? uldics -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ From lafriks at gmail.com Wed Jan 19 07:41:07 2011 From: lafriks at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Lauris_Buk=C5=A1is=2DHaberkorns?=) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:41:07 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?dmFqYWR6xKtnYXMgcGlsc8STdHUgcm9iZcW+YXM=?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Ja nav ?oti steidzami, tad neb?tu v?lams, jo tuv?k? m?ne?a laik? pabeig?u sagatavot datus ar prec?z?m robe??m, ko ieimport?t un tad atkal neprec?z?s robe?as b?s j?iet un manu?li j?dz?? lauk?. Tas gan tikai novadiem un pils?t?m... Ja vajag ?oti steidzami un gatavs p?c importa neprec?z?s robe?as dz?st lauk?, tad dro?i :) Lauris 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 02:13 rakst?ja: > Sveicin?ti! V?los piebiedroties LV OSM pulci?am! > > Ikdien? lietojot CityGuide navig?ciju ar neofici?lo OSM Latvijas karti, > secin?ju ka vair?kumam Latvijas pils?tu OSM kart? visp?r nav vai?ir ne?l?dz > galam nosl?gtas pils?tas robe?as. > Tas izpau?as t? ka navig?cijas mekl??an??visp?r nav iesp?jams atrast t?du > pils?tu p?c nosaukuma vai mekl?jot ielu atrodas?apt. 15gab. L??pl??a?vai > 20gab Br?v?bas ielas da??d?s Latvijas viet?s jo t?s nav atbilsto?i iek?autas > pils?tas robe??s. > > Mans jaut?jums ir diezgan nopietns - vai neiebilstat ka es s?k?u pamaz?m > likt ac?mredzami??oooti?aptuvenas pils?tu robe?as tikai t?d?? > lai?struktur?tu ielu mekl??anu navig?cij?? > Vai robe?ai pietiek ar place=town un name=nosaukums un?kad vajadz?gs ar? > admin_level ? > > P.S. P?c CityGuide redzu ka "pareiz?s" robe?as jau ir sekojo??m pils?t?m : > Bauska: http://img694.imageshack.us/i/bordertypebauska.png/ > Kegums : http://img703.imageshack.us/i/bordertypekegums.png/ > Koknese:?http://img217.imageshack.us/i/bordertypekoknese.png/ > Olaine:?http://img222.imageshack.us/i/bordertypeolaine.png/ > Skriveri: http://img204.imageshack.us/i/bordertypeskriveri.png/ > u.c. > Anstrupe Dumele Dundaga Jaundundaga Jaunmarupe Ezermuiza Gavsene Ildzere > Kalki Klarmuiza Labdzere Lapmezciems Laukmuiza Muni Naujene Puiskalnciems > Sabdagas Saustere Spilve Sude Vidale Karlmuiza Vabole Valpene > > J? k?dam ir jaut?jumi par CityGuide navig?ciju ar prieku atbild??u. > > Ar cie?u, Toms (Intergrator) > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > > From lafriks at gmail.com Wed Jan 19 08:12:58 2011 From: lafriks at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Lauris_Buk=C5=A1is=2DHaberkorns?=) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:12:58 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?dmFqYWR6xKtnYXMgcGlsc8STdHUgcm9iZcW+YXM=?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Tiek tais?ts skripts, kas no shapefile form?ta p?rkonvert? tos uz OSM. Dati ir par visiem novadiem, valsts noz?mes pils?t?m, k? ar? pils?t?m, kas bija rajonu centri. Lauris 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 10:06 rakst?ja: > Sveiks, > > varb?t uzskaiti ?trum? k?d?m pils?tam jau tiek gatavotas robe?as?(vai otr?di > kur?m n?) es tad tais??u p?r?j?m. > P.S. Ko noz?m? "gatavo datus" ??Vai tad var tos sagatavot un import?t.ar > skriptiem? > > Ar cie?u, Toms > > On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:41:07 +0200 > Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >> Ja nav ?oti steidzami, tad neb?tu v?lams, jo tuv?k? m?ne?a laik? >> pabeig?u sagatavot datus ar prec?z?m robe??m, ko ieimport?t un tad >> atkal neprec?z?s robe?as b?s j?iet un manu?li j?dz?? lauk?. Tas gan >> tikai novadiem un pils?t?m... Ja vajag ?oti steidzami un gatavs p?c >> importa neprec?z?s robe?as dz?st lauk?, tad dro?i :) >> >> Lauris >> >> 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 02:13 rakst?ja: >>> Sveicin?ti! V?los piebiedroties LV OSM pulci?am! >>> >>> Ikdien? lietojot CityGuide navig?ciju ar neofici?lo OSM >>>Latvijas karti, >>> secin?ju ka vair?kumam Latvijas pils?tu OSM kart? visp?r >>>nav vai?ir ne?l?dz >>> galam nosl?gtas pils?tas robe?as. >>> Tas izpau?as t? ka navig?cijas mekl??an??visp?r nav >>>iesp?jams atrast t?du >>> pils?tu p?c nosaukuma vai mekl?jot ielu atrodas?apt. >>>15gab. L??pl??a?vai >>> 20gab Br?v?bas ielas da??d?s Latvijas viet?s jo t?s nav >>>atbilsto?i iek?autas >>> pils?tas robe??s. >>> >>> Mans jaut?jums ir diezgan nopietns - vai neiebilstat ka >>>es s?k?u pamaz?m >>> likt ac?mredzami??oooti?aptuvenas pils?tu robe?as tikai >>>t?d?? >>> lai?struktur?tu ielu mekl??anu navig?cij?? >>> Vai robe?ai pietiek ar place=town un name=nosaukums >>>un?kad vajadz?gs ar? >>> admin_level ? >>> >>> P.S. P?c CityGuide redzu ka "pareiz?s" robe?as jau ir >>>sekojo??m pils?t?m : >>> Bauska: >>>http://img694.imageshack.us/i/bordertypebauska.png/ >>> Kegums : >>>http://img703.imageshack.us/i/bordertypekegums.png/ >>> Koknese:?http://img217.imageshack.us/i/bordertypekoknese.png/ >>> Olaine:?http://img222.imageshack.us/i/bordertypeolaine.png/ >>> Skriveri: >>>http://img204.imageshack.us/i/bordertypeskriveri.png/ >>> u.c. >>> Anstrupe Dumele Dundaga Jaundundaga Jaunmarupe Ezermuiza >>>Gavsene Ildzere >>> Kalki Klarmuiza Labdzere Lapmezciems Laukmuiza Muni >>>Naujene Puiskalnciems >>> Sabdagas Saustere Spilve Sude Vidale Karlmuiza Vabole >>>Valpene >>> >>> J? k?dam ir jaut?jumi par CityGuide navig?ciju ar prieku >>>atbild??u. >>> >>> Ar cie?u, Toms (Intergrator) >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-lv mailing list >>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-lv mailing list >> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > > From tfr at apollo.lv Wed Jan 19 09:15:53 2011 From: tfr at apollo.lv (tfr at apollo.lv) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:15:53 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] CityGuide un OSM karte In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From viesturz at gmail.com Wed Jan 19 09:35:22 2011 From: viesturz at gmail.com (Viesturs Zarins) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:35:22 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?q?Inovat=C4=ABva_Latvijas_b=C5=ABvkonstrukcija?= In-Reply-To: <4D35EF57.6040804@nakts.net> References: <4D35EF57.6040804@nakts.net> Message-ID: Nu pec PDF importa vienmer ar rokam jadzes ara visadi sitadi. Izskatas ka p?ris ir palikusi. Viesturs 2011. gada 18. janv?ris 21:51 Rich rakst?ja: > On 01/18/11 20:49, Raivis Dejus wrote: > >> Sveicin?ti! >> >> Gribu padal?ties ar visai inovat?vas Latvijas b?vkonstrukcijas >> atkl?jumu. Laboju kartes k??das un uzd?ros ?im: >> >> http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=25.39864&lat=57.43618&zoom=17&opacity=0.80 >> < >> http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=25.39864&lat=57.43618&zoom=17&opacity=0.80 >> > >> >> Saite n?kamaj?m paaudz?m: >> http://img638.imageshack.us/img638/5059/ekranattelsosminspector.png >> > > pdf imports sajucis praataa ? :) > > -- >> >> Cie??, >> Raivis Dejus >> Valdes loceklis >> SIA World Technology Frontier >> >> Tel.: 26457260 >> E-pasts: raivis at wtf.lv >> www.wtf.lv >> > -- > Rich > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tfr at apollo.lv Wed Jan 19 10:41:14 2011 From: tfr at apollo.lv (tfr at apollo.lv) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:41:14 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] CityGuide un OSM karte In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: p?rs?tu v?lreiz jo nav ?sti skaidrs vai aizg?ja pareizi (iepr. bija html form?t?, kur? arh?v? r?d?s ka scrubbed) Sveicin?ti, CityGuide ko lietoju ir cits (krievu) produkts http://www.probki.net/Programs/ un manupr?t tas nav nek?d? saist?b? ar v?cu Webnologic CityGuide. Krievi taisa pa?u programmu (kuras maksas versiju Latvij? pagaid?m v?l iesp?jams dab?t test??anai pa br?vu - kam interes? klausaties ?ovakar 19-21 TopRadio 91.9 un s?tiet iszinu uz 144 "Info - Interese CityGuide. V?rds mobilais". Ofici?lo CitiGida Latvias karti taisa un uztur kurtuesi.lv kuri cik man zin?ms ne?em nek?dus datus no OSM. Toties "neofici?lo" bezmaksas Latvijas(un daudzu citu valstu) OSM karti CityGidam taisa viens krievu entuziasts Kirils (Zkir/Pierce) vi?am ir skripts kur? katras dienas beig?s apstr?d? aktu?lo valsts OSM karti un noliek to : http://osm.interlan.ru/cg_maps/LV-FULL-1.rar  - ar garumz?m?m http://osm.interlan.ru/cg_maps/LV-FULL.rar   - ?rzemniekiem, bez garumz?m?m Kartes ir speci?l? CityGuide DCM form?t? un ab?m ir atsauce uz OSM: LV-FULL-1_osm Verison:1.5 ? OpenStreetMap ar cie?u, Toms >On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 08:50:55 +0200 >uldics at gmail.com wrote: > > J?, ir jaut?jumi. Vi?i jau uzreiz pied?v? datus, kas ?emti no OSM? Jo m?jaslap? skaisti st?v: > Software & Technology: > (?1998-2005) Webnologic Internet Systems > Data & Maps: > (?2005) City of Kaiserslautern > Nelas?ju visu lapu, uz darbu j?dodas, bet neizskat?s, ka kaut kur par OSM b?tu kas min?ts. > Vai to lietot?ji pa?i liek iek?? un datu form?ts vienk?r?i net???m sakr?t? > uldics >> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 02:13:59 +0200,  wrote: >> J? k?dam ir jaut?jumi par CityGuide navig?ciju ar prieku atbild??u. >> >> Ar cie?u, Toms (Intergrator) From viesturz at gmail.com Fri Jan 21 12:28:12 2011 From: viesturz at gmail.com (Viesturs Zarins) Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:28:12 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?dmFqYWR6xKtnYXMgcGlsc8STdHUgcm9iZcW+YXM=?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Ehh, nu jau gadu ka vins tais?s. Kad ta beidzot b?s gatavs? Viesturs 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 10:12 Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns rakst?ja: > Tiek tais?ts skripts, kas no shapefile form?ta p?rkonvert? tos uz OSM. > Dati ir par visiem novadiem, valsts noz?mes pils?t?m, k? ar? pils?t?m, > kas bija rajonu centri. > > Lauris > > 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 10:06 rakst?ja: > > Sveiks, > > > > varb?t uzskaiti ?trum? k?d?m pils?tam jau tiek gatavotas robe?as (vai > otr?di > > kur?m n?) es tad tais??u p?r?j?m. > > P.S. Ko noz?m? "gatavo datus" ? Vai tad var tos sagatavot un import?t.ar > > skriptiem? > > > > Ar cie?u, Toms > > > > On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:41:07 +0200 > > Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: > >> Ja nav ?oti steidzami, tad neb?tu v?lams, jo tuv?k? m?ne?a laik? > >> pabeig?u sagatavot datus ar prec?z?m robe??m, ko ieimport?t un tad > >> atkal neprec?z?s robe?as b?s j?iet un manu?li j?dz?? lauk?. Tas gan > >> tikai novadiem un pils?t?m... Ja vajag ?oti steidzami un gatavs p?c > >> importa neprec?z?s robe?as dz?st lauk?, tad dro?i :) > >> > >> Lauris > >> > >> 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 02:13 rakst?ja: > >>> Sveicin?ti! V?los piebiedroties LV OSM pulci?am! > >>> > >>> Ikdien? lietojot CityGuide navig?ciju ar neofici?lo OSM > >>>Latvijas karti, > >>> secin?ju ka vair?kumam Latvijas pils?tu OSM kart? visp?r > >>>nav vai ir ne l?dz > >>> galam nosl?gtas pils?tas robe?as. > >>> Tas izpau?as t? ka navig?cijas mekl??an? visp?r nav > >>>iesp?jams atrast t?du > >>> pils?tu p?c nosaukuma vai mekl?jot ielu atrodas apt. > >>>15gab. L??pl??a vai > >>> 20gab Br?v?bas ielas da??d?s Latvijas viet?s jo t?s nav > >>>atbilsto?i iek?autas > >>> pils?tas robe??s. > >>> > >>> Mans jaut?jums ir diezgan nopietns - vai neiebilstat ka > >>>es s?k?u pamaz?m > >>> likt ac?mredzami ?oooti aptuvenas pils?tu robe?as tikai > >>>t?d?? > >>> lai struktur?tu ielu mekl??anu navig?cij?? > >>> Vai robe?ai pietiek ar place=town un name=nosaukums > >>>un kad vajadz?gs ar? > >>> admin_level ? > >>> > >>> P.S. P?c CityGuide redzu ka "pareiz?s" robe?as jau ir > >>>sekojo??m pils?t?m : > >>> Bauska: > >>>http://img694.imageshack.us/i/bordertypebauska.png/ > >>> Kegums : > >>>http://img703.imageshack.us/i/bordertypekegums.png/ > >>> Koknese: http://img217.imageshack.us/i/bordertypekoknese.png/ > >>> Olaine: http://img222.imageshack.us/i/bordertypeolaine.png/ > >>> Skriveri: > >>>http://img204.imageshack.us/i/bordertypeskriveri.png/ > >>> u.c. > >>> Anstrupe Dumele Dundaga Jaundundaga Jaunmarupe Ezermuiza > >>>Gavsene Ildzere > >>> Kalki Klarmuiza Labdzere Lapmezciems Laukmuiza Muni > >>>Naujene Puiskalnciems > >>> Sabdagas Saustere Spilve Sude Vidale Karlmuiza Vabole > >>>Valpene > >>> > >>> J? k?dam ir jaut?jumi par CityGuide navig?ciju ar prieku > >>>atbild??u. > >>> > >>> Ar cie?u, Toms (Intergrator) > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Talk-lv mailing list > >>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > >>> > >>> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Talk-lv mailing list > >> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lafriks at gmail.com Fri Jan 21 12:50:54 2011 From: lafriks at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Lauris_Buk=C5=A1is=2DHaberkorns?=) Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:50:54 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?dmFqYWR6xKtnYXMgcGlsc8STdHUgcm9iZcW+YXM=?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Nu gadu vi?? netais?j?s :) Tagad esmu atradis laiku beidzot pie?erties k?rt?gi kl?t un tuv?kaj? laik? dom?ju piebeigt.. Galven? probl?ma bija taj? apst?kl?, ka blakus novadu robe?as, kur vi??m vajadz?tu iet visam smuki vienai l?nijai starp diviem novadiem, ir vietas, kur k?ds punkts nesakr?t... Bet nu jau to liekas, ka b?s izdevies veiksm?gi apstr?d?t, ta, ka nav vairs daudz palicis l?dz fini?am. Lauris 2011. gada 21. janv?ris 14:28 Viesturs Zarins rakst?ja: > Ehh, nu jau gadu ka vins tais?s. > Kad ta beidzot b?s gatavs? > Viesturs > > 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 10:12 Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns > rakst?ja: >> >> Tiek tais?ts skripts, kas no shapefile form?ta p?rkonvert? tos uz OSM. >> Dati ir par visiem novadiem, valsts noz?mes pils?t?m, k? ar? pils?t?m, >> kas bija rajonu centri. >> >> Lauris >> >> 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 10:06 ? rakst?ja: >> > Sveiks, >> > >> > varb?t uzskaiti ?trum? k?d?m pils?tam jau tiek gatavotas robe?as?(vai >> > otr?di >> > kur?m n?) es tad tais??u p?r?j?m. >> > P.S. Ko noz?m? "gatavo datus" ??Vai tad var tos sagatavot un import?t.ar >> > skriptiem? >> > >> > Ar cie?u, Toms >> > >> > On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:41:07 +0200 >> > Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >> >> Ja nav ?oti steidzami, tad neb?tu v?lams, jo tuv?k? m?ne?a laik? >> >> pabeig?u sagatavot datus ar prec?z?m robe??m, ko ieimport?t un tad >> >> atkal neprec?z?s robe?as b?s j?iet un manu?li j?dz?? lauk?. Tas gan >> >> tikai novadiem un pils?t?m... Ja vajag ?oti steidzami un gatavs p?c >> >> importa neprec?z?s robe?as dz?st lauk?, tad dro?i :) >> >> >> >> Lauris >> >> >> >> 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 02:13 rakst?ja: >> >>> Sveicin?ti! V?los piebiedroties LV OSM pulci?am! >> >>> >> >>> Ikdien? lietojot CityGuide navig?ciju ar neofici?lo OSM >> >>>Latvijas karti, >> >>> secin?ju ka vair?kumam Latvijas pils?tu OSM kart? visp?r >> >>>nav vai?ir ne?l?dz >> >>> galam nosl?gtas pils?tas robe?as. >> >>> Tas izpau?as t? ka navig?cijas mekl??an??visp?r nav >> >>>iesp?jams atrast t?du >> >>> pils?tu p?c nosaukuma vai mekl?jot ielu atrodas?apt. >> >>>15gab. L??pl??a?vai >> >>> 20gab Br?v?bas ielas da??d?s Latvijas viet?s jo t?s nav >> >>>atbilsto?i iek?autas >> >>> pils?tas robe??s. >> >>> >> >>> Mans jaut?jums ir diezgan nopietns - vai neiebilstat ka >> >>>es s?k?u pamaz?m >> >>> likt ac?mredzami??oooti?aptuvenas pils?tu robe?as tikai >> >>>t?d?? >> >>> lai?struktur?tu ielu mekl??anu navig?cij?? >> >>> Vai robe?ai pietiek ar place=town un name=nosaukums >> >>>un?kad vajadz?gs ar? >> >>> admin_level ? >> >>> >> >>> P.S. P?c CityGuide redzu ka "pareiz?s" robe?as jau ir >> >>>sekojo??m pils?t?m : >> >>> Bauska: >> >>>http://img694.imageshack.us/i/bordertypebauska.png/ >> >>> Kegums : >> >>>http://img703.imageshack.us/i/bordertypekegums.png/ >> >>> Koknese:?http://img217.imageshack.us/i/bordertypekoknese.png/ >> >>> Olaine:?http://img222.imageshack.us/i/bordertypeolaine.png/ >> >>> Skriveri: >> >>>http://img204.imageshack.us/i/bordertypeskriveri.png/ >> >>> u.c. >> >>> Anstrupe Dumele Dundaga Jaundundaga Jaunmarupe Ezermuiza >> >>>Gavsene Ildzere >> >>> Kalki Klarmuiza Labdzere Lapmezciems Laukmuiza Muni >> >>>Naujene Puiskalnciems >> >>> Sabdagas Saustere Spilve Sude Vidale Karlmuiza Vabole >> >>>Valpene >> >>> >> >>> J? k?dam ir jaut?jumi par CityGuide navig?ciju ar prieku >> >>>atbild??u. >> >>> >> >>> Ar cie?u, Toms (Intergrator) >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> Talk-lv mailing list >> >>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >> >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Talk-lv mailing list >> >> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >> >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >> > >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-lv mailing list >> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > > From tfr at apollo.lv Fri Jan 21 15:55:43 2011 From: tfr at apollo.lv (tfr at apollo.lv) Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 17:55:43 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?dmFqYWR6xKtnYXMgcGlsc8STdHUgcm9iZcW+YXM=?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Sveiki, l?dzu izskaidojiet k?ds tad mums ir tas v?lamais pils?tu robe?u tago?anas veids? Patreiz kart? redzu divus variantus kas abi ir teor?tiski pareizi: a) boundary=administrative, place_name=nosaukums vai b) place=city/town/village/hamlet, name=nosaukums Sakar? ar to paman?ju ka C?su un Valmieras robe??s var?tu b?t k??da (boundary=administrative, name=Nosaukums) vai tad tur nevajadz?tu likt place_name=Nosaukums? Var?ju jau uzreiz pats pam??in?t izlabot, bet dro??bas labad vispirms pajaut?ju. Un kas b?tu j?dara (piem. Raiskums) vai b?tu j?nosl?dz tr?ksto?? pils?tas robe?a pa ?deni ja blakus ir ezers? ar cie?u, Toms. On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:50:54 +0200 Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: ? Nu gadu vi?? netais?j?s :) Tagad esmu atradis laiku beidzot pie?erties k?rt?gi kl?t un tuv?kaj? laik? dom?ju piebeigt.. Galven? probl?ma bija taj? apst?kl?, ka blakus novadu robe?as, kur vi??m vajadz?tu iet visam smuki vienai l?nijai starp diviem novadiem, ir vietas, kur k?ds punkts nesakr?t... Bet nu jau to liekas, ka b?s izdevies veiksm?gi apstr?d?t, ta, ka nav vairs daudz palicis l?dz fini?am. Lauris 2011. gada 21. janv?ris 14:28 Viesturs Zarins rakst?ja: Ehh, nu jau gadu ka vins tais?s. Kad ta beidzot b?s gatavs? Viesturs 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 10:12 Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns rakst?ja: Tiek tais?ts skripts, kas no shapefile form?ta p?rkonvert? tos uz OSM. Dati ir par visiem novadiem, valsts noz?mes pils?t?m, k? ar? pils?t?m, kas bija rajonu centri. Lauris 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 10:06 rakst?ja: > Sveiks, > > varb?t uzskaiti ?trum? k?d?m pils?tam jau tiek gatavotas robe?as (vai > otr?di > kur?m n?) es tad tais??u p?r?j?m. > P.S. Ko noz?m? "gatavo datus" ? Vai tad var tos sagatavot un import?t.ar > skriptiem? > > Ar cie?u, Toms > > On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:41:07 +0200 > Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >> Ja nav ?oti steidzami, tad neb?tu v?lams, jo tuv?k? m?ne?a laik? >> pabeig?u sagatavot datus ar prec?z?m robe??m, ko ieimport?t un tad >> atkal neprec?z?s robe?as b?s j?iet un manu?li j?dz?? lauk?. Tas gan >> tikai novadiem un pils?t?m... Ja vajag ?oti steidzami un gatavs p?c >> importa neprec?z?s robe?as dz?st lauk?, tad dro?i :) >> >> Lauris From viesturz at gmail.com Sat Jan 22 16:34:51 2011 From: viesturz at gmail.com (Viesturs Zarins) Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 18:34:51 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?q?Bing_ortofoto_lieto=C5=A1ana?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Sveiks! Drikst legali parzimet. Nekada source nav janorada. Bet upload komentaros butu verts pieminet. Tikai nem vera ka Bing ortofoto ir ar vera nemamu nobidi Rigas centra un vel citas vietas. Vairak lasi: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bing ir seviski Precision un Source tag nodalas. Viesturs 2011. gada 21. janv?ris 20:01 rakst?ja: > Labvakar Viestur, > > l?dz galam nesapratu vai leg?li dr?kst p?rz?m?t Bing ortfoto? > Vai katrai uzz?m?tai m?jai j?nor?da Bing source? > (uzg?ju baigi labo P?tera m?ju z?m??anas filmi?u b?s j?s?k JOSM ar m?ju > z?m??anu :) > > ar cie?u, Toms. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From viesturz at gmail.com Sun Jan 23 10:14:28 2011 From: viesturz at gmail.com (Viesturs Zarins) Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 12:14:28 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?q?Aizdom=C4=ABga_iela?= Message-ID: Sveiciens! K?ds zin?t?js (gints?) var?tu uzmest aci un pateikt vai ?? iela ir re?la vai tikai spoks... http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4849969 Viesturs -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From polis.gints at gmail.com Sun Jan 23 10:54:09 2011 From: polis.gints at gmail.com (Gints Polis) Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 12:54:09 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?iso-8859-13?q?Aizdom=EEga_iela?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dom?ju t? ir k??da. 2011. gada 23. janv?ris 12:14 Viesturs Zarins rakst?ja: > Sveiciens! > > K?ds zin?t?js (gints?) var?tu uzmest aci un pateikt vai ?? iela ir re?la > vai tikai spoks... > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4849969 > > Viesturs > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From viesturz at gmail.com Sun Jan 23 11:03:14 2011 From: viesturz at gmail.com (Viesturs Zarins) Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 13:03:14 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?dmFqYWR6xKtnYXMgcGlsc8STdHUgcm9iZcW+YXM=?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Ar pils?tu robe??m ir ??p?gi. Nelaime t? ka nav ?sti ofici?l?s sh?mas pils?tu robe?u atz?m??anai. Praks? lieto admin_level=8 Bet http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative ir Latvijai sarakst?tas piln?gas mu???bas. Place_name= nav j?lieto, j?lieto ir tikai name=. Skat http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place_name Robe?u ar pils?tas nodi saista kop? ar rel?ciju. Skat http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary Probl?mas, protams, s?kas eksport?jot datus uz citiem form?tiem, jo ?is standarts ir diezgan jauns un eksport??anas r?ki v?l nav piel?goti. Viesturs 2011. gada 21. janv?ris 17:55 rakst?ja: > Sveiki, > > l?dzu izskaidojiet k?ds tad mums ir tas v?lamais pils?tu robe?u tago?anas > veids? > Patreiz kart? redzu divus variantus kas abi ir teor?tiski pareizi: > a) boundary=administrative, place_name=nosaukums > vai > b) place=city/town/village/hamlet, name=nosaukums > > Sakar? ar to paman?ju ka C?su un Valmieras robe??s var?tu b?t k??da > (boundary=administrative, name=Nosaukums) vai tad tur nevajadz?tu likt > place_name=Nosaukums? Var?ju jau uzreiz pats pam??in?t izlabot, bet dro??bas > labad vispirms pajaut?ju. > > Un kas b?tu j?dara (piem. Raiskums) vai b?tu j?nosl?dz tr?ksto?? pils?tas > robe?a pa ?deni ja blakus ir ezers? > > ar cie?u, Toms. > > On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:50:54 +0200 > > Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: > > Nu gadu vi?? netais?j?s :) Tagad esmu atradis laiku beidzot pie?erties > k?rt?gi kl?t un tuv?kaj? laik? dom?ju piebeigt.. Galven? probl?ma bija > taj? apst?kl?, ka blakus novadu robe?as, kur vi??m vajadz?tu iet visam > smuki vienai l?nijai starp diviem novadiem, ir vietas, kur k?ds punkts > nesakr?t... Bet nu jau to liekas, ka b?s izdevies veiksm?gi > apstr?d?t, ta, ka nav vairs daudz palicis l?dz fini?am. > Lauris > > > 2011. gada 21. janv?ris 14:28 Viesturs Zarins > rakst?ja: > > > Ehh, nu jau gadu ka vins tais?s. > Kad ta beidzot b?s gatavs? > Viesturs > > 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 10:12 Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns > rakst?ja: > > > Tiek tais?ts skripts, kas no shapefile form?ta p?rkonvert? tos uz OSM. > Dati ir par visiem novadiem, valsts noz?mes pils?t?m, k? ar? pils?t?m, > kas bija rajonu centri. > > Lauris > > 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 10:06 rakst?ja: > >> Sveiks, >> >> varb?t uzskaiti ?trum? k?d?m pils?tam jau tiek gatavotas robe?as (vai >> otr?di >> kur?m n?) es tad tais??u p?r?j?m. >> P.S. Ko noz?m? "gatavo datus" ? Vai tad var tos sagatavot un import?t.ar >> skriptiem? >> >> Ar cie?u, Toms >> >> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:41:07 +0200 >> Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >> >>> Ja nav ?oti steidzami, tad neb?tu v?lams, jo tuv?k? m?ne?a laik? >>> pabeig?u sagatavot datus ar prec?z?m robe??m, ko ieimport?t un tad >>> atkal neprec?z?s robe?as b?s j?iet un manu?li j?dz?? lauk?. Tas gan >>> tikai novadiem un pils?t?m... Ja vajag ?oti steidzami un gatavs p?c >>> importa neprec?z?s robe?as dz?st lauk?, tad dro?i :) >>> >>> Lauris >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From viesturz at gmail.com Sun Jan 23 11:04:53 2011 From: viesturz at gmail.com (Viesturs Zarins) Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 13:04:53 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?q?Aizdom=C4=ABga_iela?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dz?sts. 2011. gada 23. janv?ris 12:54 Gints Polis rakst?ja: > Dom?ju t? ir k??da. > > 2011. gada 23. janv?ris 12:14 Viesturs Zarins rakst?ja: > > Sveiciens! >> >> K?ds zin?t?js (gints?) var?tu uzmest aci un pateikt vai ?? iela ir re?la >> vai tikai spoks... >> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4849969 >> >> Viesturs >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From uldics at gmail.com Sun Jan 23 16:16:19 2011 From: uldics at gmail.com (uldics at gmail.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 18:16:19 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?dmFqYWR6xKtnYXMgcGlsc8STdHUgcm9iZcW+YXM=?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 13:03:14 +0200, Viesturs Zarins wrote: > Ar pils?tu robe??m ir ??p?gi. > > Nelaime t? ka nav ?sti ofici?l?s sh?mas pils?tu robe?u atz?m??anai. > Praks? > lieto admin_level=8 > Bet http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative ir > Latvijai sarakst?tas piln?gas mu???bas. > > Place_name= nav j?lieto, j?lieto ir tikai name=. Skat > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place_name > Robe?u ar pils?tas nodi saista kop? ar rel?ciju. Skat > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary > > Probl?mas, protams, s?kas eksport?jot datus uz citiem form?tiem, jo ?is > standarts ir diezgan jauns un eksport??anas r?ki v?l nav piel?goti. > > Viesturs Nebiju paman?jis, ka ieviestas rel?cijas ar? te. K?dreiz place_name bija vajadz?gs, lai render?t?ji nez?m?tu divus nosaukumus. Uzskatu, ka tas ir velt?gi sare???ts tagad. Diem??l ne tikai eksport? ar jauno metodi ir probl?ma, bet ar? render?t?jiem v?l nav skaidr?bas. Bet nu tas ir laika jaut?jums, gan jau b?s viss k?rt?b?. Bet kam?r tas IMHO v?l nav nopietni ieg?jies, attur??os un atst??u savai pils?tai veco tagojumu. P?c k?da laika, kad b?s ieg?jies, tad jau b?s j?nomaina ;) Ja neuzrad?sies lab?ka metode. uldics -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ From lafriks at gmail.com Mon Jan 24 08:03:45 2011 From: lafriks at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Lauris_Buk=C5=A1is=2DHaberkorns?=) Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:03:45 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?dmFqYWR6xKtnYXMgcGlsc8STdHUgcm9iZcW+YXM=?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Nu t?s mu???bas tur es sarakst?ju... tik jaut?jums k?p?c mu???bas? :) Lauris 2011. gada 23. janv?ris 13:03 Viesturs Zarins rakst?ja: > Ar pils?tu robe??m ir ??p?gi. > Nelaime t? ka nav ?sti ofici?l?s sh?mas pils?tu robe?u atz?m??anai. Praks? > lieto admin_level=8 > Bet?http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative?ir > Latvijai sarakst?tas piln?gas mu???bas. > Place_name= nav j?lieto, j?lieto ir tikai name=. > Skat?http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place_name > Robe?u ar pils?tas nodi saista kop? ar rel?ciju. > Skat?http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary > Probl?mas, protams, s?kas eksport?jot datus uz citiem form?tiem, jo ?is > standarts ir diezgan jauns un eksport??anas r?ki v?l nav piel?goti. > Viesturs > > 2011. gada 21. janv?ris 17:55 rakst?ja: >> >> Sveiki, >> >> l?dzu izskaidojiet k?ds tad mums ir tas v?lamais pils?tu robe?u tago?anas >> veids? >> Patreiz kart? redzu divus variantus kas abi ir teor?tiski pareizi: >> a) boundary=administrative, place_name=nosaukums >> vai >> b) place=city/town/village/hamlet, name=nosaukums >> >> Sakar? ar to paman?ju ka C?su un Valmieras robe??s var?tu b?t k??da >> (boundary=administrative, name=Nosaukums) vai tad tur nevajadz?tu likt >> place_name=Nosaukums? Var?ju jau uzreiz pats pam??in?t izlabot, bet dro??bas >> labad vispirms pajaut?ju. >> >> Un kas b?tu j?dara (piem. Raiskums) vai b?tu j?nosl?dz tr?ksto?? pils?tas >> robe?a pa ?deni ja blakus ir ezers? >> >> ar cie?u, Toms. >> >> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:50:54 +0200 >> Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >> >> Nu gadu vi?? netais?j?s :) Tagad esmu atradis laiku beidzot pie?erties >> k?rt?gi kl?t un tuv?kaj? laik? dom?ju piebeigt.. Galven? probl?ma bija >> taj? apst?kl?, ka blakus novadu robe?as, kur vi??m vajadz?tu iet visam >> smuki vienai l?nijai starp diviem novadiem, ir vietas, kur k?ds punkts >> nesakr?t... Bet nu jau to liekas, ka b?s izdevies veiksm?gi >> apstr?d?t, ta, ka nav vairs daudz palicis l?dz fini?am. >> Lauris >> >> >> 2011. gada 21. janv?ris 14:28 Viesturs Zarins >> rakst?ja: >> >> >> Ehh, nu jau gadu ka vins tais?s. >> Kad ta beidzot b?s gatavs? >> Viesturs >> >> 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 10:12 Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns >> rakst?ja: >> >> >> Tiek tais?ts skripts, kas no shapefile form?ta p?rkonvert? tos uz OSM. >> Dati ir par visiem novadiem, valsts noz?mes pils?t?m, k? ar? pils?t?m, >> kas bija rajonu centri. >> >> Lauris >> >> 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 10:06 rakst?ja: >>> >>> Sveiks, >>> >>> varb?t uzskaiti ?trum? k?d?m pils?tam jau tiek gatavotas robe?as (vai >>> otr?di >>> kur?m n?) es tad tais??u p?r?j?m. >>> P.S. Ko noz?m? "gatavo datus" ? Vai tad var tos sagatavot un import?t.ar >>> skriptiem? >>> >>> Ar cie?u, Toms >>> >>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:41:07 +0200 >>> Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >>>> >>>> Ja nav ?oti steidzami, tad neb?tu v?lams, jo tuv?k? m?ne?a laik? >>>> pabeig?u sagatavot datus ar prec?z?m robe??m, ko ieimport?t un tad >>>> atkal neprec?z?s robe?as b?s j?iet un manu?li j?dz?? lauk?. Tas gan >>>> tikai novadiem un pils?t?m... Ja vajag ?oti steidzami un gatavs p?c >>>> importa neprec?z?s robe?as dz?st lauk?, tad dro?i :) >>>> >>>> Lauris >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-lv mailing list >> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > > From viesturz at gmail.com Mon Jan 24 09:33:20 2011 From: viesturz at gmail.com (Viesturs Zarins) Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:33:20 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?dmFqYWR6xKtnYXMgcGlsc8STdHUgcm9iZcW+YXM=?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Tapec ka neiet nekadi kopa ar citu valstu aprakstiem. Un pats saproti kapec tas ir svarigi. Tur visp?r liels murgs ir un daudz?m valst?m ir miskaste. Varag vienu lielu revamp. Viesturs 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 10:03 Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns rakst?ja: > Nu t?s mu???bas tur es sarakst?ju... tik jaut?jums k?p?c mu???bas? :) > > Lauris > > 2011. gada 23. janv?ris 13:03 Viesturs Zarins > rakst?ja: > > Ar pils?tu robe??m ir ??p?gi. > > Nelaime t? ka nav ?sti ofici?l?s sh?mas pils?tu robe?u atz?m??anai. > Praks? > > lieto admin_level=8 > > Bet http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative ir > > Latvijai sarakst?tas piln?gas mu???bas. > > Place_name= nav j?lieto, j?lieto ir tikai name=. > > Skat http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place_name > > Robe?u ar pils?tas nodi saista kop? ar rel?ciju. > > Skat http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary > > Probl?mas, protams, s?kas eksport?jot datus uz citiem form?tiem, jo ?is > > standarts ir diezgan jauns un eksport??anas r?ki v?l nav piel?goti. > > Viesturs > > > > 2011. gada 21. janv?ris 17:55 rakst?ja: > >> > >> Sveiki, > >> > >> l?dzu izskaidojiet k?ds tad mums ir tas v?lamais pils?tu robe?u > tago?anas > >> veids? > >> Patreiz kart? redzu divus variantus kas abi ir teor?tiski pareizi: > >> a) boundary=administrative, place_name=nosaukums > >> vai > >> b) place=city/town/village/hamlet, name=nosaukums > >> > >> Sakar? ar to paman?ju ka C?su un Valmieras robe??s var?tu b?t k??da > >> (boundary=administrative, name=Nosaukums) vai tad tur nevajadz?tu likt > >> place_name=Nosaukums? Var?ju jau uzreiz pats pam??in?t izlabot, bet > dro??bas > >> labad vispirms pajaut?ju. > >> > >> Un kas b?tu j?dara (piem. Raiskums) vai b?tu j?nosl?dz tr?ksto?? > pils?tas > >> robe?a pa ?deni ja blakus ir ezers? > >> > >> ar cie?u, Toms. > >> > >> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:50:54 +0200 > >> Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: > >> > >> Nu gadu vi?? netais?j?s :) Tagad esmu atradis laiku beidzot pie?erties > >> k?rt?gi kl?t un tuv?kaj? laik? dom?ju piebeigt.. Galven? probl?ma bija > >> taj? apst?kl?, ka blakus novadu robe?as, kur vi??m vajadz?tu iet visam > >> smuki vienai l?nijai starp diviem novadiem, ir vietas, kur k?ds punkts > >> nesakr?t... Bet nu jau to liekas, ka b?s izdevies veiksm?gi > >> apstr?d?t, ta, ka nav vairs daudz palicis l?dz fini?am. > >> Lauris > >> > >> > >> 2011. gada 21. janv?ris 14:28 Viesturs Zarins > >> rakst?ja: > >> > >> > >> Ehh, nu jau gadu ka vins tais?s. > >> Kad ta beidzot b?s gatavs? > >> Viesturs > >> > >> 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 10:12 Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns < > lafriks at gmail.com> > >> rakst?ja: > >> > >> > >> Tiek tais?ts skripts, kas no shapefile form?ta p?rkonvert? tos uz OSM. > >> Dati ir par visiem novadiem, valsts noz?mes pils?t?m, k? ar? pils?t?m, > >> kas bija rajonu centri. > >> > >> Lauris > >> > >> 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 10:06 rakst?ja: > >>> > >>> Sveiks, > >>> > >>> varb?t uzskaiti ?trum? k?d?m pils?tam jau tiek gatavotas robe?as (vai > >>> otr?di > >>> kur?m n?) es tad tais??u p?r?j?m. > >>> P.S. Ko noz?m? "gatavo datus" ? Vai tad var tos sagatavot un import? > t.ar > >>> skriptiem? > >>> > >>> Ar cie?u, Toms > >>> > >>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:41:07 +0200 > >>> Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Ja nav ?oti steidzami, tad neb?tu v?lams, jo tuv?k? m?ne?a laik? > >>>> pabeig?u sagatavot datus ar prec?z?m robe??m, ko ieimport?t un tad > >>>> atkal neprec?z?s robe?as b?s j?iet un manu?li j?dz?? lauk?. Tas gan > >>>> tikai novadiem un pils?t?m... Ja vajag ?oti steidzami un gatavs p?c > >>>> importa neprec?z?s robe?as dz?st lauk?, tad dro?i :) > >>>> > >>>> Lauris > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Talk-lv mailing list > >> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Talk-lv mailing list > > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lafriks at gmail.com Mon Jan 24 09:52:46 2011 From: lafriks at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Lauris_Buk=C5=A1is=2DHaberkorns?=) Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:52:46 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?dmFqYWR6xKtnYXMgcGlsc8STdHUgcm9iZcW+YXM=?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Nu vien?gais, ko tur var?tu dar?t ir apvienot valsts noz?mes pils?tas un novadus vien? l?men?, un pagastus un pils?tas ar? kop? vien? l?men?... bet nu person?gi man negrib?tos da??das lietas likt kop?.. vair?k tur ar? neko nevar izdar?t... Ir k?di pied?v?jumi? Lauris 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 11:33 Viesturs Zarins rakst?ja: > Tapec ka neiet nekadi kopa ar citu valstu aprakstiem. Un pats saproti kapec > tas ir svarigi. > Tur visp?r liels murgs ir un daudz?m valst?m ir miskaste. > Varag vienu lielu revamp. > Viesturs > > 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 10:03 Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns > rakst?ja: >> >> Nu t?s mu???bas tur es sarakst?ju... tik jaut?jums k?p?c mu???bas? :) >> >> Lauris >> >> 2011. gada 23. janv?ris 13:03 Viesturs Zarins >> rakst?ja: >> > Ar pils?tu robe??m ir ??p?gi. >> > Nelaime t? ka nav ?sti ofici?l?s sh?mas pils?tu robe?u atz?m??anai. >> > Praks? >> > lieto admin_level=8 >> > Bet?http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative?ir >> > Latvijai sarakst?tas piln?gas mu???bas. >> > Place_name= nav j?lieto, j?lieto ir tikai name=. >> > Skat?http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place_name >> > Robe?u ar pils?tas nodi saista kop? ar rel?ciju. >> > Skat?http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary >> > Probl?mas, protams, s?kas eksport?jot datus uz citiem form?tiem, jo ?is >> > standarts ir diezgan jauns un eksport??anas r?ki v?l nav piel?goti. >> > Viesturs >> > >> > 2011. gada 21. janv?ris 17:55 rakst?ja: >> >> >> >> Sveiki, >> >> >> >> l?dzu izskaidojiet k?ds tad mums ir tas v?lamais pils?tu robe?u >> >> tago?anas >> >> veids? >> >> Patreiz kart? redzu divus variantus kas abi ir teor?tiski pareizi: >> >> a) boundary=administrative, place_name=nosaukums >> >> vai >> >> b) place=city/town/village/hamlet, name=nosaukums >> >> >> >> Sakar? ar to paman?ju ka C?su un Valmieras robe??s var?tu b?t k??da >> >> (boundary=administrative, name=Nosaukums) vai tad tur nevajadz?tu likt >> >> place_name=Nosaukums? Var?ju jau uzreiz pats pam??in?t izlabot, bet >> >> dro??bas >> >> labad vispirms pajaut?ju. >> >> >> >> Un kas b?tu j?dara (piem. Raiskums) vai b?tu j?nosl?dz tr?ksto?? >> >> pils?tas >> >> robe?a pa ?deni ja blakus ir ezers? >> >> >> >> ar cie?u, Toms. >> >> >> >> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:50:54 +0200 >> >> Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >> >> >> >> Nu gadu vi?? netais?j?s :) Tagad esmu atradis laiku beidzot pie?erties >> >> k?rt?gi kl?t un tuv?kaj? laik? dom?ju piebeigt.. Galven? probl?ma bija >> >> taj? apst?kl?, ka blakus novadu robe?as, kur vi??m vajadz?tu iet visam >> >> smuki vienai l?nijai starp diviem novadiem, ir vietas, kur k?ds punkts >> >> nesakr?t... Bet nu jau to liekas, ka b?s izdevies veiksm?gi >> >> apstr?d?t, ta, ka nav vairs daudz palicis l?dz fini?am. >> >> Lauris >> >> >> >> >> >> 2011. gada 21. janv?ris 14:28 Viesturs Zarins >> >> rakst?ja: >> >> >> >> >> >> Ehh, nu jau gadu ka vins tais?s. >> >> Kad ta beidzot b?s gatavs? >> >> Viesturs >> >> >> >> 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 10:12 Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns >> >> >> >> rakst?ja: >> >> >> >> >> >> Tiek tais?ts skripts, kas no shapefile form?ta p?rkonvert? tos uz OSM. >> >> Dati ir par visiem novadiem, valsts noz?mes pils?t?m, k? ar? pils?t?m, >> >> kas bija rajonu centri. >> >> >> >> Lauris >> >> >> >> 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 10:06 rakst?ja: >> >>> >> >>> Sveiks, >> >>> >> >>> varb?t uzskaiti ?trum? k?d?m pils?tam jau tiek gatavotas robe?as (vai >> >>> otr?di >> >>> kur?m n?) es tad tais??u p?r?j?m. >> >>> P.S. Ko noz?m? "gatavo datus" ? Vai tad var tos sagatavot un >> >>> import?t.ar >> >>> skriptiem? >> >>> >> >>> Ar cie?u, Toms >> >>> >> >>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:41:07 +0200 >> >>> Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> Ja nav ?oti steidzami, tad neb?tu v?lams, jo tuv?k? m?ne?a laik? >> >>>> pabeig?u sagatavot datus ar prec?z?m robe??m, ko ieimport?t un tad >> >>>> atkal neprec?z?s robe?as b?s j?iet un manu?li j?dz?? lauk?. Tas gan >> >>>> tikai novadiem un pils?t?m... Ja vajag ?oti steidzami un gatavs p?c >> >>>> importa neprec?z?s robe?as dz?st lauk?, tad dro?i :) >> >>>> >> >>>> Lauris >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Talk-lv mailing list >> >> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >> >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Talk-lv mailing list >> > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >> > >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-lv mailing list >> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > > From peteris.bruns at gmail.com Mon Jan 24 10:15:22 2011 From: peteris.bruns at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?UMSTdGVyaXMgQnLFq25z?=) Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:15:22 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?dmFqYWR6xKtnYXMgcGlsc8STdHUgcm9iZcW+YXM=?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4D3D513A.9000601@gmail.com> Paskat?ties uz principu k?du izmanto NUTS (http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/nuts_nomenclature/introduction). pb On 2011.01.24. 11:52, Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: > Nu vien?gais, ko tur var?tu dar?t ir apvienot valsts noz?mes pils?tas > un novadus vien? l?men?, un pagastus un pils?tas ar? kop? vien? > l?men?... bet nu person?gi man negrib?tos da??das lietas likt kop?.. > vair?k tur ar? neko nevar izdar?t... Ir k?di pied?v?jumi? > > Lauris > > 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 11:33 Viesturs Zarins rakst?ja: >> Tapec ka neiet nekadi kopa ar citu valstu aprakstiem. Un pats saproti kapec >> tas ir svarigi. >> Tur visp?r liels murgs ir un daudz?m valst?m ir miskaste. >> Varag vienu lielu revamp. >> Viesturs >> >> 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 10:03 Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns >> rakst?ja: >>> Nu t?s mu???bas tur es sarakst?ju... tik jaut?jums k?p?c mu???bas? :) >>> >>> Lauris >>> >>> 2011. gada 23. janv?ris 13:03 Viesturs Zarins >>> rakst?ja: >>>> Ar pils?tu robe??m ir ??p?gi. >>>> Nelaime t? ka nav ?sti ofici?l?s sh?mas pils?tu robe?u atz?m??anai. >>>> Praks? >>>> lieto admin_level=8 >>>> Bet http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative ir >>>> Latvijai sarakst?tas piln?gas mu???bas. >>>> Place_name= nav j?lieto, j?lieto ir tikai name=. >>>> Skat http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place_name >>>> Robe?u ar pils?tas nodi saista kop? ar rel?ciju. >>>> Skat http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary >>>> Probl?mas, protams, s?kas eksport?jot datus uz citiem form?tiem, jo ?is >>>> standarts ir diezgan jauns un eksport??anas r?ki v?l nav piel?goti. >>>> Viesturs >>>> >>>> 2011. gada 21. janv?ris 17:55 rakst?ja: >>>>> Sveiki, >>>>> >>>>> l?dzu izskaidojiet k?ds tad mums ir tas v?lamais pils?tu robe?u >>>>> tago?anas >>>>> veids? >>>>> Patreiz kart? redzu divus variantus kas abi ir teor?tiski pareizi: >>>>> a) boundary=administrative, place_name=nosaukums >>>>> vai >>>>> b) place=city/town/village/hamlet, name=nosaukums >>>>> >>>>> Sakar? ar to paman?ju ka C?su un Valmieras robe??s var?tu b?t k??da >>>>> (boundary=administrative, name=Nosaukums) vai tad tur nevajadz?tu likt >>>>> place_name=Nosaukums? Var?ju jau uzreiz pats pam??in?t izlabot, bet >>>>> dro??bas >>>>> labad vispirms pajaut?ju. >>>>> >>>>> Un kas b?tu j?dara (piem. Raiskums) vai b?tu j?nosl?dz tr?ksto?? >>>>> pils?tas >>>>> robe?a pa ?deni ja blakus ir ezers? >>>>> >>>>> ar cie?u, Toms. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:50:54 +0200 >>>>> Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Nu gadu vi?? netais?j?s :) Tagad esmu atradis laiku beidzot pie?erties >>>>> k?rt?gi kl?t un tuv?kaj? laik? dom?ju piebeigt.. Galven? probl?ma bija >>>>> taj? apst?kl?, ka blakus novadu robe?as, kur vi??m vajadz?tu iet visam >>>>> smuki vienai l?nijai starp diviem novadiem, ir vietas, kur k?ds punkts >>>>> nesakr?t... Bet nu jau to liekas, ka b?s izdevies veiksm?gi >>>>> apstr?d?t, ta, ka nav vairs daudz palicis l?dz fini?am. >>>>> Lauris >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2011. gada 21. janv?ris 14:28 Viesturs Zarins >>>>> rakst?ja: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ehh, nu jau gadu ka vins tais?s. >>>>> Kad ta beidzot b?s gatavs? >>>>> Viesturs >>>>> >>>>> 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 10:12 Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns >>>>> >>>>> rakst?ja: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Tiek tais?ts skripts, kas no shapefile form?ta p?rkonvert? tos uz OSM. >>>>> Dati ir par visiem novadiem, valsts noz?mes pils?t?m, k? ar? pils?t?m, >>>>> kas bija rajonu centri. >>>>> >>>>> Lauris >>>>> >>>>> 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 10:06 rakst?ja: >>>>>> Sveiks, >>>>>> >>>>>> varb?t uzskaiti ?trum? k?d?m pils?tam jau tiek gatavotas robe?as (vai >>>>>> otr?di >>>>>> kur?m n?) es tad tais??u p?r?j?m. >>>>>> P.S. Ko noz?m? "gatavo datus" ? Vai tad var tos sagatavot un >>>>>> import?t.ar >>>>>> skriptiem? >>>>>> >>>>>> Ar cie?u, Toms >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:41:07 +0200 >>>>>> Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >>>>>>> Ja nav ?oti steidzami, tad neb?tu v?lams, jo tuv?k? m?ne?a laik? >>>>>>> pabeig?u sagatavot datus ar prec?z?m robe??m, ko ieimport?t un tad >>>>>>> atkal neprec?z?s robe?as b?s j?iet un manu?li j?dz?? lauk?. Tas gan >>>>>>> tikai novadiem un pils?t?m... Ja vajag ?oti steidzami un gatavs p?c >>>>>>> importa neprec?z?s robe?as dz?st lauk?, tad dro?i :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Lauris >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Talk-lv mailing list >>>>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Talk-lv mailing list >>>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-lv mailing list >>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >> > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv From lafriks at gmail.com Mon Jan 24 11:26:03 2011 From: lafriks at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Lauris_Buk=C5=A1is=2DHaberkorns?=) Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:26:03 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?dmFqYWR6xKtnYXMgcGlsc8STdHUgcm9iZcW+YXM=?= In-Reply-To: <4D3D513A.9000601@gmail.com> References: <4D3D513A.9000601@gmail.com> Message-ID: Manupr?t tas gal?gi nav tas... LV tur ir sadal?ta 5 re?ionos un viss... Katrai valstij ir savi administrat?vie l?me?i un t?p?c jau ir t? tabula, kur tos aprakst?t. Man negrib?tos, ka tiek sagr?stas da??das lietas vien?, jo tom?r novads ir novads un pils?ta ir pils?ta t?pat k? pagasti un visi p?r?jie iedal?jumi. Var diskut?t kuru likt augst?k valsts noz?mes pils?tu vai novadu un pagastu vai pils?tu un kuros tie?i l?me?os likt, bet tas ar? viss... Pa?reiz ir: 2 - valsts robe?a 3, 4 - N/A (viens no ?iem ir j?rezerv? apgabaliem, kad t?dus izdom?s tom?r pie?emt) 5 - valsts noz?mes pils?tas 6 - novadi 7 - pils?tas 8 - pagasti 9 - ciemi 10 - priek?pils?tas Mans pied?v?tais variants tad pa?laik b?tu: 2 - valsts robe?a 3 - N/A (?is ir j?rezerv? apgabaliem, kad t?dus izdom?s tom?r pie?emt) 4 - N/A 5 - valsts noz?mes pils?tas 6 - novadi 7 - pagasti 8 - pils?tas 9 - ciemi 10 - priek?pils?tas V?l var dom?t par valsts noz?mes pils?tu un novadu lik?anu 4, 5 vai 6 l?men?.. Lauris 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 12:15 P?teris Br?ns rakst?ja: > Paskat?ties uz principu k?du izmanto NUTS > (http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/nuts_nomenclature/introduction). > > pb > > On 2011.01.24. 11:52, Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >> >> Nu vien?gais, ko tur var?tu dar?t ir apvienot valsts noz?mes pils?tas >> un novadus vien? l?men?, un pagastus un pils?tas ar? kop? vien? >> l?men?... bet nu person?gi man negrib?tos da??das lietas likt kop?.. >> vair?k tur ar? neko nevar izdar?t... Ir k?di pied?v?jumi? >> >> Lauris >> >> 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 11:33 Viesturs Zarins >> ?rakst?ja: >>> >>> Tapec ka neiet nekadi kopa ar citu valstu aprakstiem. Un pats saproti >>> kapec >>> tas ir svarigi. >>> Tur visp?r liels murgs ir un daudz?m valst?m ir miskaste. >>> Varag vienu lielu revamp. >>> Viesturs >>> >>> 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 10:03 Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns >>> rakst?ja: >>>> >>>> Nu t?s mu???bas tur es sarakst?ju... tik jaut?jums k?p?c mu???bas? :) >>>> >>>> Lauris >>>> >>>> 2011. gada 23. janv?ris 13:03 Viesturs Zarins >>>> rakst?ja: >>>>> >>>>> Ar pils?tu robe??m ir ??p?gi. >>>>> Nelaime t? ka nav ?sti ofici?l?s sh?mas pils?tu robe?u atz?m??anai. >>>>> Praks? >>>>> lieto admin_level=8 >>>>> Bet http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative ir >>>>> Latvijai sarakst?tas piln?gas mu???bas. >>>>> Place_name= nav j?lieto, j?lieto ir tikai name=. >>>>> Skat http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place_name >>>>> Robe?u ar pils?tas nodi saista kop? ar rel?ciju. >>>>> Skat http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary >>>>> Probl?mas, protams, s?kas eksport?jot datus uz citiem form?tiem, jo ?is >>>>> standarts ir diezgan jauns un eksport??anas r?ki v?l nav piel?goti. >>>>> Viesturs >>>>> >>>>> 2011. gada 21. janv?ris 17:55 ?rakst?ja: >>>>>> >>>>>> Sveiki, >>>>>> >>>>>> l?dzu izskaidojiet k?ds tad mums ir tas v?lamais pils?tu robe?u >>>>>> tago?anas >>>>>> veids? >>>>>> Patreiz kart? redzu divus variantus kas abi ir teor?tiski pareizi: >>>>>> a) boundary=administrative, place_name=nosaukums >>>>>> vai >>>>>> b) place=city/town/village/hamlet, name=nosaukums >>>>>> >>>>>> Sakar? ar to paman?ju ka C?su un Valmieras robe??s var?tu b?t k??da >>>>>> (boundary=administrative, name=Nosaukums) vai tad tur nevajadz?tu likt >>>>>> place_name=Nosaukums? Var?ju jau uzreiz pats pam??in?t izlabot, bet >>>>>> dro??bas >>>>>> labad vispirms pajaut?ju. >>>>>> >>>>>> Un kas b?tu j?dara (piem. Raiskums) vai b?tu j?nosl?dz tr?ksto?? >>>>>> pils?tas >>>>>> robe?a pa ?deni ja blakus ir ezers? >>>>>> >>>>>> ar cie?u, Toms. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:50:54 +0200 >>>>>> Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Nu gadu vi?? netais?j?s :) Tagad esmu atradis laiku beidzot pie?erties >>>>>> k?rt?gi kl?t un tuv?kaj? laik? dom?ju piebeigt.. Galven? probl?ma bija >>>>>> taj? apst?kl?, ka blakus novadu robe?as, kur vi??m vajadz?tu iet visam >>>>>> smuki vienai l?nijai starp diviem novadiem, ir vietas, kur k?ds punkts >>>>>> nesakr?t... Bet nu jau to liekas, ka b?s izdevies veiksm?gi >>>>>> apstr?d?t, ta, ka nav vairs daudz palicis l?dz fini?am. >>>>>> Lauris >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2011. gada 21. janv?ris 14:28 Viesturs Zarins >>>>>> rakst?ja: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Ehh, nu jau gadu ka vins tais?s. >>>>>> Kad ta beidzot b?s gatavs? >>>>>> Viesturs >>>>>> >>>>>> 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 10:12 Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns >>>>>> >>>>>> rakst?ja: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Tiek tais?ts skripts, kas no shapefile form?ta p?rkonvert? tos uz OSM. >>>>>> Dati ir par visiem novadiem, valsts noz?mes pils?t?m, k? ar? pils?t?m, >>>>>> kas bija rajonu centri. >>>>>> >>>>>> Lauris >>>>>> >>>>>> 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 10:06 ?rakst?ja: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sveiks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> varb?t uzskaiti ?trum? k?d?m pils?tam jau tiek gatavotas robe?as (vai >>>>>>> otr?di >>>>>>> kur?m n?) es tad tais??u p?r?j?m. >>>>>>> P.S. Ko noz?m? "gatavo datus" ? Vai tad var tos sagatavot un >>>>>>> import?t.ar >>>>>>> skriptiem? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ar cie?u, Toms >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:41:07 +0200 >>>>>>> Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ja nav ?oti steidzami, tad neb?tu v?lams, jo tuv?k? m?ne?a laik? >>>>>>>> pabeig?u sagatavot datus ar prec?z?m robe??m, ko ieimport?t un tad >>>>>>>> atkal neprec?z?s robe?as b?s j?iet un manu?li j?dz?? lauk?. Tas gan >>>>>>>> tikai novadiem un pils?t?m... Ja vajag ?oti steidzami un gatavs p?c >>>>>>>> importa neprec?z?s robe?as dz?st lauk?, tad dro?i :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Lauris >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Talk-lv mailing list >>>>>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Talk-lv mailing list >>>>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Talk-lv mailing list >>>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-lv mailing list >> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > From peteris.bruns at gmail.com Mon Jan 24 11:46:46 2011 From: peteris.bruns at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?UMSTdGVyaXMgQnLFq25z?=) Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:46:46 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?dmFqYWR6xKtnYXMgcGlsc8STdHUgcm9iZcW+YXM=?= In-Reply-To: References: <4D3D513A.9000601@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4D3D66A6.3020601@gmail.com> Nav runa par kop??anu vai ieb??anu ?aj? sh?m?, tas bija tikai idej?m + NUTS kodi l?dz zin?mam l?menim ir savietojami un p?rmantot pasaul? zin?mu klasifik?ciju neb?tu tas sliktakais. ??iet CSB vai kaut kur citur jaunajiem novadiem NUTS3 kodi bija public?ti. pb On 2011.01.24. 13:26, Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: > Manupr?t tas gal?gi nav tas... LV tur ir sadal?ta 5 re?ionos un > viss... Katrai valstij ir savi administrat?vie l?me?i un t?p?c jau ir > t? tabula, kur tos aprakst?t. Man negrib?tos, ka tiek sagr?stas > da??das lietas vien?, jo tom?r novads ir novads un pils?ta ir pils?ta > t?pat k? pagasti un visi p?r?jie iedal?jumi. Var diskut?t kuru likt > augst?k valsts noz?mes pils?tu vai novadu un pagastu vai pils?tu un > kuros tie?i l?me?os likt, bet tas ar? viss... > > Pa?reiz ir: > 2 - valsts robe?a > 3, 4 - N/A (viens no ?iem ir j?rezerv? apgabaliem, kad t?dus izdom?s > tom?r pie?emt) > 5 - valsts noz?mes pils?tas > 6 - novadi > 7 - pils?tas > 8 - pagasti > 9 - ciemi > 10 - priek?pils?tas > > Mans pied?v?tais variants tad pa?laik b?tu: > 2 - valsts robe?a > 3 - N/A (?is ir j?rezerv? apgabaliem, kad t?dus izdom?s tom?r pie?emt) > 4 - N/A > 5 - valsts noz?mes pils?tas > 6 - novadi > 7 - pagasti > 8 - pils?tas > 9 - ciemi > 10 - priek?pils?tas > > V?l var dom?t par valsts noz?mes pils?tu un novadu lik?anu 4, 5 vai 6 l?men?.. > > Lauris > > 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 12:15 P?teris Br?ns rakst?ja: >> Paskat?ties uz principu k?du izmanto NUTS >> (http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/nuts_nomenclature/introduction). >> >> pb >> >> On 2011.01.24. 11:52, Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >>> Nu vien?gais, ko tur var?tu dar?t ir apvienot valsts noz?mes pils?tas >>> un novadus vien? l?men?, un pagastus un pils?tas ar? kop? vien? >>> l?men?... bet nu person?gi man negrib?tos da??das lietas likt kop?.. >>> vair?k tur ar? neko nevar izdar?t... Ir k?di pied?v?jumi? >>> >>> Lauris >>> >>> 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 11:33 Viesturs Zarins >>> rakst?ja: >>>> Tapec ka neiet nekadi kopa ar citu valstu aprakstiem. Un pats saproti >>>> kapec >>>> tas ir svarigi. >>>> Tur visp?r liels murgs ir un daudz?m valst?m ir miskaste. >>>> Varag vienu lielu revamp. >>>> Viesturs >>>> >>>> 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 10:03 Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns >>>> rakst?ja: >>>>> Nu t?s mu???bas tur es sarakst?ju... tik jaut?jums k?p?c mu???bas? :) >>>>> >>>>> Lauris >>>>> >>>>> 2011. gada 23. janv?ris 13:03 Viesturs Zarins >>>>> rakst?ja: >>>>>> Ar pils?tu robe??m ir ??p?gi. >>>>>> Nelaime t? ka nav ?sti ofici?l?s sh?mas pils?tu robe?u atz?m??anai. >>>>>> Praks? >>>>>> lieto admin_level=8 >>>>>> Bet http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative ir >>>>>> Latvijai sarakst?tas piln?gas mu???bas. >>>>>> Place_name= nav j?lieto, j?lieto ir tikai name=. >>>>>> Skat http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place_name >>>>>> Robe?u ar pils?tas nodi saista kop? ar rel?ciju. >>>>>> Skat http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary >>>>>> Probl?mas, protams, s?kas eksport?jot datus uz citiem form?tiem, jo ?is >>>>>> standarts ir diezgan jauns un eksport??anas r?ki v?l nav piel?goti. >>>>>> Viesturs >>>>>> >>>>>> 2011. gada 21. janv?ris 17:55 rakst?ja: >>>>>>> Sveiki, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> l?dzu izskaidojiet k?ds tad mums ir tas v?lamais pils?tu robe?u >>>>>>> tago?anas >>>>>>> veids? >>>>>>> Patreiz kart? redzu divus variantus kas abi ir teor?tiski pareizi: >>>>>>> a) boundary=administrative, place_name=nosaukums >>>>>>> vai >>>>>>> b) place=city/town/village/hamlet, name=nosaukums >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sakar? ar to paman?ju ka C?su un Valmieras robe??s var?tu b?t k??da >>>>>>> (boundary=administrative, name=Nosaukums) vai tad tur nevajadz?tu likt >>>>>>> place_name=Nosaukums? Var?ju jau uzreiz pats pam??in?t izlabot, bet >>>>>>> dro??bas >>>>>>> labad vispirms pajaut?ju. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Un kas b?tu j?dara (piem. Raiskums) vai b?tu j?nosl?dz tr?ksto?? >>>>>>> pils?tas >>>>>>> robe?a pa ?deni ja blakus ir ezers? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ar cie?u, Toms. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:50:54 +0200 >>>>>>> Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nu gadu vi?? netais?j?s :) Tagad esmu atradis laiku beidzot pie?erties >>>>>>> k?rt?gi kl?t un tuv?kaj? laik? dom?ju piebeigt.. Galven? probl?ma bija >>>>>>> taj? apst?kl?, ka blakus novadu robe?as, kur vi??m vajadz?tu iet visam >>>>>>> smuki vienai l?nijai starp diviem novadiem, ir vietas, kur k?ds punkts >>>>>>> nesakr?t... Bet nu jau to liekas, ka b?s izdevies veiksm?gi >>>>>>> apstr?d?t, ta, ka nav vairs daudz palicis l?dz fini?am. >>>>>>> Lauris >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2011. gada 21. janv?ris 14:28 Viesturs Zarins >>>>>>> rakst?ja: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ehh, nu jau gadu ka vins tais?s. >>>>>>> Kad ta beidzot b?s gatavs? >>>>>>> Viesturs >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 10:12 Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns >>>>>>> >>>>>>> rakst?ja: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tiek tais?ts skripts, kas no shapefile form?ta p?rkonvert? tos uz OSM. >>>>>>> Dati ir par visiem novadiem, valsts noz?mes pils?t?m, k? ar? pils?t?m, >>>>>>> kas bija rajonu centri. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Lauris >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 10:06 rakst?ja: >>>>>>>> Sveiks, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> varb?t uzskaiti ?trum? k?d?m pils?tam jau tiek gatavotas robe?as (vai >>>>>>>> otr?di >>>>>>>> kur?m n?) es tad tais??u p?r?j?m. >>>>>>>> P.S. Ko noz?m? "gatavo datus" ? Vai tad var tos sagatavot un >>>>>>>> import?t.ar >>>>>>>> skriptiem? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ar cie?u, Toms >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:41:07 +0200 >>>>>>>> Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >>>>>>>>> Ja nav ?oti steidzami, tad neb?tu v?lams, jo tuv?k? m?ne?a laik? >>>>>>>>> pabeig?u sagatavot datus ar prec?z?m robe??m, ko ieimport?t un tad >>>>>>>>> atkal neprec?z?s robe?as b?s j?iet un manu?li j?dz?? lauk?. Tas gan >>>>>>>>> tikai novadiem un pils?t?m... Ja vajag ?oti steidzami un gatavs p?c >>>>>>>>> importa neprec?z?s robe?as dz?st lauk?, tad dro?i :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Lauris >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Talk-lv mailing list >>>>>>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Talk-lv mailing list >>>>>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Talk-lv mailing list >>>>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-lv mailing list >>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-lv mailing list >> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >> > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv From lafriks at gmail.com Mon Jan 24 12:15:47 2011 From: lafriks at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Lauris_Buk=C5=A1is=2DHaberkorns?=) Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:15:47 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?dmFqYWR6xKtnYXMgcGlsc8STdHUgcm9iZcW+YXM=?= In-Reply-To: <4D3D66A6.3020601@gmail.com> References: <4D3D513A.9000601@gmail.com> <4D3D66A6.3020601@gmail.com> Message-ID: Bet tur nav ko p?r?emt. NUTS3 ir statistiskie re?ioni, kas Latviju iedala 6 re?ionos, kas nav administrat?vie re?ioni. Pied?v? l?dzu konkr?tu variantu k? tavupr?t tam b?tu j?izskat?s, tad ar? varam t?l?k diskut?t, sav?d?k t?da tuk?a salmu kul?ana vien san?k :) Lauris 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 13:46 P?teris Br?ns rakst?ja: > Nav runa par kop??anu vai ieb??anu ?aj? sh?m?, tas bija tikai idej?m ?+ NUTS > kodi l?dz zin?mam l?menim ir savietojami un p?rmantot pasaul? zin?mu > klasifik?ciju neb?tu tas sliktakais. ??iet CSB vai kaut kur citur jaunajiem > novadiem NUTS3 kodi bija public?ti. > > pb > > On 2011.01.24. 13:26, Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >> >> Manupr?t tas gal?gi nav tas... LV tur ir sadal?ta 5 re?ionos un >> viss... Katrai valstij ir savi administrat?vie l?me?i un t?p?c jau ir >> t? tabula, kur tos aprakst?t. Man negrib?tos, ka tiek sagr?stas >> da??das lietas vien?, jo tom?r novads ir novads un pils?ta ir pils?ta >> t?pat k? pagasti un visi p?r?jie iedal?jumi. Var diskut?t kuru likt >> augst?k valsts noz?mes pils?tu vai novadu un pagastu vai pils?tu un >> kuros tie?i l?me?os likt, bet tas ar? viss... >> >> Pa?reiz ir: >> 2 - valsts robe?a >> 3, 4 - N/A (viens no ?iem ir j?rezerv? apgabaliem, kad t?dus izdom?s >> tom?r pie?emt) >> 5 - valsts noz?mes pils?tas >> 6 - novadi >> 7 - pils?tas >> 8 - pagasti >> 9 - ciemi >> 10 - priek?pils?tas >> >> Mans pied?v?tais variants tad pa?laik b?tu: >> 2 - valsts robe?a >> 3 - N/A (?is ir j?rezerv? apgabaliem, kad t?dus izdom?s tom?r pie?emt) >> 4 - N/A >> 5 - valsts noz?mes pils?tas >> 6 - novadi >> 7 - pagasti >> 8 - pils?tas >> 9 - ciemi >> 10 - priek?pils?tas >> >> V?l var dom?t par valsts noz?mes pils?tu un novadu lik?anu 4, 5 vai 6 >> l?men?.. >> >> Lauris >> >> 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 12:15 P?teris Br?ns >> ?rakst?ja: >>> >>> Paskat?ties uz principu k?du izmanto NUTS >>> >>> (http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/nuts_nomenclature/introduction). >>> >>> pb >>> >>> On 2011.01.24. 11:52, Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >>>> >>>> Nu vien?gais, ko tur var?tu dar?t ir apvienot valsts noz?mes pils?tas >>>> un novadus vien? l?men?, un pagastus un pils?tas ar? kop? vien? >>>> l?men?... bet nu person?gi man negrib?tos da??das lietas likt kop?.. >>>> vair?k tur ar? neko nevar izdar?t... Ir k?di pied?v?jumi? >>>> >>>> Lauris >>>> >>>> 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 11:33 Viesturs Zarins >>>> ?rakst?ja: >>>>> >>>>> Tapec ka neiet nekadi kopa ar citu valstu aprakstiem. Un pats saproti >>>>> kapec >>>>> tas ir svarigi. >>>>> Tur visp?r liels murgs ir un daudz?m valst?m ir miskaste. >>>>> Varag vienu lielu revamp. >>>>> Viesturs >>>>> >>>>> 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 10:03 Lauris >>>>> Buk?is-Haberkorns >>>>> rakst?ja: >>>>>> >>>>>> Nu t?s mu???bas tur es sarakst?ju... tik jaut?jums k?p?c mu???bas? :) >>>>>> >>>>>> Lauris >>>>>> >>>>>> 2011. gada 23. janv?ris 13:03 Viesturs Zarins >>>>>> rakst?ja: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ar pils?tu robe??m ir ??p?gi. >>>>>>> Nelaime t? ka nav ?sti ofici?l?s sh?mas pils?tu robe?u atz?m??anai. >>>>>>> Praks? >>>>>>> lieto admin_level=8 >>>>>>> Bet http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative >>>>>>> ir >>>>>>> Latvijai sarakst?tas piln?gas mu???bas. >>>>>>> Place_name= nav j?lieto, j?lieto ir tikai name=. >>>>>>> Skat http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place_name >>>>>>> Robe?u ar pils?tas nodi saista kop? ar rel?ciju. >>>>>>> Skat http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary >>>>>>> Probl?mas, protams, s?kas eksport?jot datus uz citiem form?tiem, jo >>>>>>> ?is >>>>>>> standarts ir diezgan jauns un eksport??anas r?ki v?l nav piel?goti. >>>>>>> Viesturs >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2011. gada 21. janv?ris 17:55 ? ?rakst?ja: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sveiki, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> l?dzu izskaidojiet k?ds tad mums ir tas v?lamais pils?tu robe?u >>>>>>>> tago?anas >>>>>>>> veids? >>>>>>>> Patreiz kart? redzu divus variantus kas abi ir teor?tiski pareizi: >>>>>>>> a) boundary=administrative, place_name=nosaukums >>>>>>>> vai >>>>>>>> b) place=city/town/village/hamlet, name=nosaukums >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sakar? ar to paman?ju ka C?su un Valmieras robe??s var?tu b?t k??da >>>>>>>> (boundary=administrative, name=Nosaukums) vai tad tur nevajadz?tu >>>>>>>> likt >>>>>>>> place_name=Nosaukums? Var?ju jau uzreiz pats pam??in?t izlabot, bet >>>>>>>> dro??bas >>>>>>>> labad vispirms pajaut?ju. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Un kas b?tu j?dara (piem. Raiskums) vai b?tu j?nosl?dz tr?ksto?? >>>>>>>> pils?tas >>>>>>>> robe?a pa ?deni ja blakus ir ezers? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ar cie?u, Toms. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:50:54 +0200 >>>>>>>> Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nu gadu vi?? netais?j?s :) Tagad esmu atradis laiku beidzot >>>>>>>> pie?erties >>>>>>>> k?rt?gi kl?t un tuv?kaj? laik? dom?ju piebeigt.. Galven? probl?ma >>>>>>>> bija >>>>>>>> taj? apst?kl?, ka blakus novadu robe?as, kur vi??m vajadz?tu iet >>>>>>>> visam >>>>>>>> smuki vienai l?nijai starp diviem novadiem, ir vietas, kur k?ds >>>>>>>> punkts >>>>>>>> nesakr?t... Bet nu jau to liekas, ka b?s izdevies veiksm?gi >>>>>>>> apstr?d?t, ta, ka nav vairs daudz palicis l?dz fini?am. >>>>>>>> Lauris >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2011. gada 21. janv?ris 14:28 Viesturs Zarins >>>>>>>> rakst?ja: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ehh, nu jau gadu ka vins tais?s. >>>>>>>> Kad ta beidzot b?s gatavs? >>>>>>>> Viesturs >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 10:12 Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> rakst?ja: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tiek tais?ts skripts, kas no shapefile form?ta p?rkonvert? tos uz >>>>>>>> OSM. >>>>>>>> Dati ir par visiem novadiem, valsts noz?mes pils?t?m, k? ar? >>>>>>>> pils?t?m, >>>>>>>> kas bija rajonu centri. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Lauris >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 10:06 ? ?rakst?ja: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sveiks, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> varb?t uzskaiti ?trum? k?d?m pils?tam jau tiek gatavotas robe?as >>>>>>>>> (vai >>>>>>>>> otr?di >>>>>>>>> kur?m n?) es tad tais??u p?r?j?m. >>>>>>>>> P.S. Ko noz?m? "gatavo datus" ? Vai tad var tos sagatavot un >>>>>>>>> import?t.ar >>>>>>>>> skriptiem? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ar cie?u, Toms >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:41:07 +0200 >>>>>>>>> Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ja nav ?oti steidzami, tad neb?tu v?lams, jo tuv?k? m?ne?a laik? >>>>>>>>>> pabeig?u sagatavot datus ar prec?z?m robe??m, ko ieimport?t un tad >>>>>>>>>> atkal neprec?z?s robe?as b?s j?iet un manu?li j?dz?? lauk?. Tas >>>>>>>>>> gan >>>>>>>>>> tikai novadiem un pils?t?m... Ja vajag ?oti steidzami un gatavs >>>>>>>>>> p?c >>>>>>>>>> importa neprec?z?s robe?as dz?st lauk?, tad dro?i :) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Lauris >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Talk-lv mailing list >>>>>>>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Talk-lv mailing list >>>>>>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Talk-lv mailing list >>>>>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Talk-lv mailing list >>>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-lv mailing list >>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-lv mailing list >> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > From lafriks at gmail.com Mon Jan 24 13:41:30 2011 From: lafriks at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Lauris_Buk=C5=A1is=2DHaberkorns?=) Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:41:30 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?dmFqYWR6xKtnYXMgcGlsc8STdHUgcm9iZcW+YXM=?= In-Reply-To: <4D3D7B66.5080504@gmail.com> References: <4D3D513A.9000601@gmail.com> <4D3D66A6.3020601@gmail.com> <4D3D7B66.5080504@gmail.com> Message-ID: Valsts robe?ai ir j?b?t 2, jo t? ir visur OSM, p?r?jie attiec?gi tad pab?d?s +1. Pagastus un pils?tas man tom?r grib?tos redz?t ar? atsevi??os l?me?os, jo kad pie?ems kaut k?du iesp?ju aprakst?t noklus?t?s v?rt?bas valsts l?men? (max_speed etc), tad b?tu labi, ja pils?tas var?tu viegli at??irt. Priek?pils?t?m nav ofici?la statusa, tas tiesa, bet ikdien? cilv?ki t?s lieto t?, ka iesp?jams t?s ir j?iez?m? ar city boundary tipu.. Izskat?s, ka pils?tam, liel?koties izmanto 8 l?meni, tad man san?k ??ds izk?rtojums: 2-Valsts robe?a 3-Apri??i/apgabali (v?l neeksist?) 4-Republikas pils?tas 5-Novadi 6-N/A 7-Pagasti 8-Pils?tas 9-Ciemi 10-Viens?tas Lauris 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 15:15 P?teris Br?ns rakst?ja: > Pareizi, nepietiekami iedzilin?jos un noputroju ar CSB statistikas > apgabaliem. > > Man san?k ?o pas?kumu dal?t div?s da??s - oficil?l? un neofici?l?. > > Ja ?em v?r? http://www.likumi.lv/doc.php?id=185993 san?k: > 1-Valsts robe?a > 2-Apri??i/apgabali (v?l neeksist?) > 3-Republikas pils?tas > 4-Novadi un teritorial?s vien?bas > 5-Pagasti un pils?tas (san?k vien? l?men?) > 6-ciemi > > Ja iesp?jams ??di to b?tu j?m??ina patur?t, jo sav?d?k san?ks interpret?cija > un k?dam vienm?r b?s j?seko l?dz un j?sp?j samapot likums->osm > klasifik?cija. Ticu, ka izmai?as neb?s par?k daudz bet mainot k?rt?bu t? > neb?s atbilsto?a patiesajai situ?cijai. > Priek?pils?t?m nav ne jausmas cik ofici?ls ir statuss, bet apkaimes ir > nedzudz ar pirkstu m?ko?os rad?ta klasifik?cija, vismaz R?gas gad?jum?, un > ofici?la statusa t?m nav, dr?z?k v?sturiska. > > pb > > On 2011.01.24. 14:15, Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >> >> Bet tur nav ko p?r?emt. NUTS3 ir statistiskie re?ioni, kas Latviju >> iedala 6 re?ionos, kas nav administrat?vie re?ioni. Pied?v? l?dzu >> konkr?tu variantu k? tavupr?t tam b?tu j?izskat?s, tad ar? varam t?l?k >> diskut?t, sav?d?k t?da tuk?a salmu kul?ana vien san?k :) >> >> Lauris >> >> 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 13:46 P?teris Br?ns >> ?rakst?ja: >>> >>> Nav runa par kop??anu vai ieb??anu ?aj? sh?m?, tas bija tikai idej?m ?+ >>> NUTS >>> kodi l?dz zin?mam l?menim ir savietojami un p?rmantot pasaul? zin?mu >>> klasifik?ciju neb?tu tas sliktakais. ??iet CSB vai kaut kur citur >>> jaunajiem >>> novadiem NUTS3 kodi bija public?ti. >>> >>> pb >>> >>> On 2011.01.24. 13:26, Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >>>> >>>> Manupr?t tas gal?gi nav tas... LV tur ir sadal?ta 5 re?ionos un >>>> viss... Katrai valstij ir savi administrat?vie l?me?i un t?p?c jau ir >>>> t? tabula, kur tos aprakst?t. Man negrib?tos, ka tiek sagr?stas >>>> da??das lietas vien?, jo tom?r novads ir novads un pils?ta ir pils?ta >>>> t?pat k? pagasti un visi p?r?jie iedal?jumi. Var diskut?t kuru likt >>>> augst?k valsts noz?mes pils?tu vai novadu un pagastu vai pils?tu un >>>> kuros tie?i l?me?os likt, bet tas ar? viss... >>>> >>>> Pa?reiz ir: >>>> 2 - valsts robe?a >>>> 3, 4 - N/A (viens no ?iem ir j?rezerv? apgabaliem, kad t?dus izdom?s >>>> tom?r pie?emt) >>>> 5 - valsts noz?mes pils?tas >>>> 6 - novadi >>>> 7 - pils?tas >>>> 8 - pagasti >>>> 9 - ciemi >>>> 10 - priek?pils?tas >>>> >>>> Mans pied?v?tais variants tad pa?laik b?tu: >>>> 2 - valsts robe?a >>>> 3 - N/A (?is ir j?rezerv? apgabaliem, kad t?dus izdom?s tom?r pie?emt) >>>> 4 - N/A >>>> 5 - valsts noz?mes pils?tas >>>> 6 - novadi >>>> 7 - pagasti >>>> 8 - pils?tas >>>> 9 - ciemi >>>> 10 - priek?pils?tas >>>> >>>> V?l var dom?t par valsts noz?mes pils?tu un novadu lik?anu 4, 5 vai 6 >>>> l?men?.. >>>> >>>> Lauris >>>> >>>> 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 12:15 P?teris Br?ns >>>> ?rakst?ja: >>>>> >>>>> Paskat?ties uz principu k?du izmanto NUTS >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> (http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/nuts_nomenclature/introduction). >>>>> >>>>> pb >>>>> >>>>> On 2011.01.24. 11:52, Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Nu vien?gais, ko tur var?tu dar?t ir apvienot valsts noz?mes pils?tas >>>>>> un novadus vien? l?men?, un pagastus un pils?tas ar? kop? vien? >>>>>> l?men?... bet nu person?gi man negrib?tos da??das lietas likt kop?.. >>>>>> vair?k tur ar? neko nevar izdar?t... Ir k?di pied?v?jumi? >>>>>> >>>>>> Lauris >>>>>> >>>>>> 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 11:33 Viesturs Zarins >>>>>> ?rakst?ja: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tapec ka neiet nekadi kopa ar citu valstu aprakstiem. Un pats saproti >>>>>>> kapec >>>>>>> tas ir svarigi. >>>>>>> Tur visp?r liels murgs ir un daudz?m valst?m ir miskaste. >>>>>>> Varag vienu lielu revamp. >>>>>>> Viesturs >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 10:03 Lauris >>>>>>> Buk?is-Haberkorns >>>>>>> rakst?ja: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nu t?s mu???bas tur es sarakst?ju... tik jaut?jums k?p?c mu???bas? >>>>>>>> :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Lauris >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2011. gada 23. janv?ris 13:03 Viesturs Zarins >>>>>>>> rakst?ja: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ar pils?tu robe??m ir ??p?gi. >>>>>>>>> Nelaime t? ka nav ?sti ofici?l?s sh?mas pils?tu robe?u atz?m??anai. >>>>>>>>> Praks? >>>>>>>>> lieto admin_level=8 >>>>>>>>> Bet >>>>>>>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative >>>>>>>>> ir >>>>>>>>> Latvijai sarakst?tas piln?gas mu???bas. >>>>>>>>> Place_name= nav j?lieto, j?lieto ir tikai name=. >>>>>>>>> Skat http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place_name >>>>>>>>> Robe?u ar pils?tas nodi saista kop? ar rel?ciju. >>>>>>>>> Skat http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary >>>>>>>>> Probl?mas, protams, s?kas eksport?jot datus uz citiem form?tiem, jo >>>>>>>>> ?is >>>>>>>>> standarts ir diezgan jauns un eksport??anas r?ki v?l nav piel?goti. >>>>>>>>> Viesturs >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2011. gada 21. janv?ris 17:55 ? ? ?rakst?ja: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sveiki, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> l?dzu izskaidojiet k?ds tad mums ir tas v?lamais pils?tu robe?u >>>>>>>>>> tago?anas >>>>>>>>>> veids? >>>>>>>>>> Patreiz kart? redzu divus variantus kas abi ir teor?tiski pareizi: >>>>>>>>>> a) boundary=administrative, place_name=nosaukums >>>>>>>>>> vai >>>>>>>>>> b) place=city/town/village/hamlet, name=nosaukums >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sakar? ar to paman?ju ka C?su un Valmieras robe??s var?tu b?t >>>>>>>>>> k??da >>>>>>>>>> (boundary=administrative, name=Nosaukums) vai tad tur nevajadz?tu >>>>>>>>>> likt >>>>>>>>>> place_name=Nosaukums? Var?ju jau uzreiz pats pam??in?t izlabot, >>>>>>>>>> bet >>>>>>>>>> dro??bas >>>>>>>>>> labad vispirms pajaut?ju. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Un kas b?tu j?dara (piem. Raiskums) vai b?tu j?nosl?dz tr?ksto?? >>>>>>>>>> pils?tas >>>>>>>>>> robe?a pa ?deni ja blakus ir ezers? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ar cie?u, Toms. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:50:54 +0200 >>>>>>>>>> Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Nu gadu vi?? netais?j?s :) Tagad esmu atradis laiku beidzot >>>>>>>>>> pie?erties >>>>>>>>>> k?rt?gi kl?t un tuv?kaj? laik? dom?ju piebeigt.. Galven? probl?ma >>>>>>>>>> bija >>>>>>>>>> taj? apst?kl?, ka blakus novadu robe?as, kur vi??m vajadz?tu iet >>>>>>>>>> visam >>>>>>>>>> smuki vienai l?nijai starp diviem novadiem, ir vietas, kur k?ds >>>>>>>>>> punkts >>>>>>>>>> nesakr?t... Bet nu jau to liekas, ka b?s izdevies veiksm?gi >>>>>>>>>> apstr?d?t, ta, ka nav vairs daudz palicis l?dz fini?am. >>>>>>>>>> Lauris >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2011. gada 21. janv?ris 14:28 Viesturs Zarins >>>>>>>>>> rakst?ja: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ehh, nu jau gadu ka vins tais?s. >>>>>>>>>> Kad ta beidzot b?s gatavs? >>>>>>>>>> Viesturs >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 10:12 Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> rakst?ja: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Tiek tais?ts skripts, kas no shapefile form?ta p?rkonvert? tos uz >>>>>>>>>> OSM. >>>>>>>>>> Dati ir par visiem novadiem, valsts noz?mes pils?t?m, k? ar? >>>>>>>>>> pils?t?m, >>>>>>>>>> kas bija rajonu centri. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Lauris >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 10:06 ? ? ?rakst?ja: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Sveiks, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> varb?t uzskaiti ?trum? k?d?m pils?tam jau tiek gatavotas robe?as >>>>>>>>>>> (vai >>>>>>>>>>> otr?di >>>>>>>>>>> kur?m n?) es tad tais??u p?r?j?m. >>>>>>>>>>> P.S. Ko noz?m? "gatavo datus" ? Vai tad var tos sagatavot un >>>>>>>>>>> import?t.ar >>>>>>>>>>> skriptiem? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ar cie?u, Toms >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:41:07 +0200 >>>>>>>>>>> Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ja nav ?oti steidzami, tad neb?tu v?lams, jo tuv?k? m?ne?a laik? >>>>>>>>>>>> pabeig?u sagatavot datus ar prec?z?m robe??m, ko ieimport?t un >>>>>>>>>>>> tad >>>>>>>>>>>> atkal neprec?z?s robe?as b?s j?iet un manu?li j?dz?? lauk?. Tas >>>>>>>>>>>> gan >>>>>>>>>>>> tikai novadiem un pils?t?m... Ja vajag ?oti steidzami un gatavs >>>>>>>>>>>> p?c >>>>>>>>>>>> importa neprec?z?s robe?as dz?st lauk?, tad dro?i :) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Lauris >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Talk-lv mailing list >>>>>>>>>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Talk-lv mailing list >>>>>>>>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>>>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Talk-lv mailing list >>>>>>>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Talk-lv mailing list >>>>>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Talk-lv mailing list >>>>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Talk-lv mailing list >>>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-lv mailing list >>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-lv mailing list >> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > > From lafriks at gmail.com Mon Jan 24 13:43:00 2011 From: lafriks at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Lauris_Buk=C5=A1is=2DHaberkorns?=) Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:43:00 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?dmFqYWR6xKtnYXMgcGlsc8STdHUgcm9iZcW+YXM=?= In-Reply-To: References: <4D3D513A.9000601@gmail.com> <4D3D66A6.3020601@gmail.com> <4D3D7B66.5080504@gmail.com> Message-ID: city => citu :) Lauris 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 15:41 Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns rakst?ja: > Valsts robe?ai ir j?b?t 2, jo t? ir visur OSM, p?r?jie attiec?gi tad > pab?d?s +1. Pagastus un pils?tas man tom?r grib?tos redz?t ar? > atsevi??os l?me?os, jo kad pie?ems kaut k?du iesp?ju aprakst?t > noklus?t?s v?rt?bas valsts l?men? (max_speed etc), tad b?tu labi, ja > pils?tas var?tu viegli at??irt. Priek?pils?t?m nav ofici?la statusa, > tas tiesa, bet ikdien? cilv?ki t?s lieto t?, ka iesp?jams t?s ir > j?iez?m? ar city boundary tipu.. Izskat?s, ka pils?tam, liel?koties > izmanto 8 l?meni, tad man san?k ??ds izk?rtojums: > > 2-Valsts robe?a > 3-Apri??i/apgabali (v?l neeksist?) > 4-Republikas pils?tas > 5-Novadi > 6-N/A > 7-Pagasti > 8-Pils?tas > 9-Ciemi > 10-Viens?tas > > Lauris > > 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 15:15 P?teris Br?ns rakst?ja: >> Pareizi, nepietiekami iedzilin?jos un noputroju ar CSB statistikas >> apgabaliem. >> >> Man san?k ?o pas?kumu dal?t div?s da??s - oficil?l? un neofici?l?. >> >> Ja ?em v?r? http://www.likumi.lv/doc.php?id=185993 san?k: >> 1-Valsts robe?a >> 2-Apri??i/apgabali (v?l neeksist?) >> 3-Republikas pils?tas >> 4-Novadi un teritorial?s vien?bas >> 5-Pagasti un pils?tas (san?k vien? l?men?) >> 6-ciemi >> >> Ja iesp?jams ??di to b?tu j?m??ina patur?t, jo sav?d?k san?ks interpret?cija >> un k?dam vienm?r b?s j?seko l?dz un j?sp?j samapot likums->osm >> klasifik?cija. Ticu, ka izmai?as neb?s par?k daudz bet mainot k?rt?bu t? >> neb?s atbilsto?a patiesajai situ?cijai. >> Priek?pils?t?m nav ne jausmas cik ofici?ls ir statuss, bet apkaimes ir >> nedzudz ar pirkstu m?ko?os rad?ta klasifik?cija, vismaz R?gas gad?jum?, un >> ofici?la statusa t?m nav, dr?z?k v?sturiska. >> >> pb >> >> On 2011.01.24. 14:15, Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >>> >>> Bet tur nav ko p?r?emt. NUTS3 ir statistiskie re?ioni, kas Latviju >>> iedala 6 re?ionos, kas nav administrat?vie re?ioni. Pied?v? l?dzu >>> konkr?tu variantu k? tavupr?t tam b?tu j?izskat?s, tad ar? varam t?l?k >>> diskut?t, sav?d?k t?da tuk?a salmu kul?ana vien san?k :) >>> >>> Lauris >>> >>> 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 13:46 P?teris Br?ns >>> ?rakst?ja: >>>> >>>> Nav runa par kop??anu vai ieb??anu ?aj? sh?m?, tas bija tikai idej?m ?+ >>>> NUTS >>>> kodi l?dz zin?mam l?menim ir savietojami un p?rmantot pasaul? zin?mu >>>> klasifik?ciju neb?tu tas sliktakais. ??iet CSB vai kaut kur citur >>>> jaunajiem >>>> novadiem NUTS3 kodi bija public?ti. >>>> >>>> pb >>>> >>>> On 2011.01.24. 13:26, Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Manupr?t tas gal?gi nav tas... LV tur ir sadal?ta 5 re?ionos un >>>>> viss... Katrai valstij ir savi administrat?vie l?me?i un t?p?c jau ir >>>>> t? tabula, kur tos aprakst?t. Man negrib?tos, ka tiek sagr?stas >>>>> da??das lietas vien?, jo tom?r novads ir novads un pils?ta ir pils?ta >>>>> t?pat k? pagasti un visi p?r?jie iedal?jumi. Var diskut?t kuru likt >>>>> augst?k valsts noz?mes pils?tu vai novadu un pagastu vai pils?tu un >>>>> kuros tie?i l?me?os likt, bet tas ar? viss... >>>>> >>>>> Pa?reiz ir: >>>>> 2 - valsts robe?a >>>>> 3, 4 - N/A (viens no ?iem ir j?rezerv? apgabaliem, kad t?dus izdom?s >>>>> tom?r pie?emt) >>>>> 5 - valsts noz?mes pils?tas >>>>> 6 - novadi >>>>> 7 - pils?tas >>>>> 8 - pagasti >>>>> 9 - ciemi >>>>> 10 - priek?pils?tas >>>>> >>>>> Mans pied?v?tais variants tad pa?laik b?tu: >>>>> 2 - valsts robe?a >>>>> 3 - N/A (?is ir j?rezerv? apgabaliem, kad t?dus izdom?s tom?r pie?emt) >>>>> 4 - N/A >>>>> 5 - valsts noz?mes pils?tas >>>>> 6 - novadi >>>>> 7 - pagasti >>>>> 8 - pils?tas >>>>> 9 - ciemi >>>>> 10 - priek?pils?tas >>>>> >>>>> V?l var dom?t par valsts noz?mes pils?tu un novadu lik?anu 4, 5 vai 6 >>>>> l?men?.. >>>>> >>>>> Lauris >>>>> >>>>> 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 12:15 P?teris Br?ns >>>>> ?rakst?ja: >>>>>> >>>>>> Paskat?ties uz principu k?du izmanto NUTS >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> (http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/nuts_nomenclature/introduction). >>>>>> >>>>>> pb >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2011.01.24. 11:52, Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nu vien?gais, ko tur var?tu dar?t ir apvienot valsts noz?mes pils?tas >>>>>>> un novadus vien? l?men?, un pagastus un pils?tas ar? kop? vien? >>>>>>> l?men?... bet nu person?gi man negrib?tos da??das lietas likt kop?.. >>>>>>> vair?k tur ar? neko nevar izdar?t... Ir k?di pied?v?jumi? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Lauris >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 11:33 Viesturs Zarins >>>>>>> ?rakst?ja: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tapec ka neiet nekadi kopa ar citu valstu aprakstiem. Un pats saproti >>>>>>>> kapec >>>>>>>> tas ir svarigi. >>>>>>>> Tur visp?r liels murgs ir un daudz?m valst?m ir miskaste. >>>>>>>> Varag vienu lielu revamp. >>>>>>>> Viesturs >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 10:03 Lauris >>>>>>>> Buk?is-Haberkorns >>>>>>>> rakst?ja: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Nu t?s mu???bas tur es sarakst?ju... tik jaut?jums k?p?c mu???bas? >>>>>>>>> :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Lauris >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2011. gada 23. janv?ris 13:03 Viesturs Zarins >>>>>>>>> rakst?ja: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ar pils?tu robe??m ir ??p?gi. >>>>>>>>>> Nelaime t? ka nav ?sti ofici?l?s sh?mas pils?tu robe?u atz?m??anai. >>>>>>>>>> Praks? >>>>>>>>>> lieto admin_level=8 >>>>>>>>>> Bet >>>>>>>>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative >>>>>>>>>> ir >>>>>>>>>> Latvijai sarakst?tas piln?gas mu???bas. >>>>>>>>>> Place_name= nav j?lieto, j?lieto ir tikai name=. >>>>>>>>>> Skat http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place_name >>>>>>>>>> Robe?u ar pils?tas nodi saista kop? ar rel?ciju. >>>>>>>>>> Skat http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary >>>>>>>>>> Probl?mas, protams, s?kas eksport?jot datus uz citiem form?tiem, jo >>>>>>>>>> ?is >>>>>>>>>> standarts ir diezgan jauns un eksport??anas r?ki v?l nav piel?goti. >>>>>>>>>> Viesturs >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2011. gada 21. janv?ris 17:55 ? ? ?rakst?ja: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Sveiki, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> l?dzu izskaidojiet k?ds tad mums ir tas v?lamais pils?tu robe?u >>>>>>>>>>> tago?anas >>>>>>>>>>> veids? >>>>>>>>>>> Patreiz kart? redzu divus variantus kas abi ir teor?tiski pareizi: >>>>>>>>>>> a) boundary=administrative, place_name=nosaukums >>>>>>>>>>> vai >>>>>>>>>>> b) place=city/town/village/hamlet, name=nosaukums >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Sakar? ar to paman?ju ka C?su un Valmieras robe??s var?tu b?t >>>>>>>>>>> k??da >>>>>>>>>>> (boundary=administrative, name=Nosaukums) vai tad tur nevajadz?tu >>>>>>>>>>> likt >>>>>>>>>>> place_name=Nosaukums? Var?ju jau uzreiz pats pam??in?t izlabot, >>>>>>>>>>> bet >>>>>>>>>>> dro??bas >>>>>>>>>>> labad vispirms pajaut?ju. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Un kas b?tu j?dara (piem. Raiskums) vai b?tu j?nosl?dz tr?ksto?? >>>>>>>>>>> pils?tas >>>>>>>>>>> robe?a pa ?deni ja blakus ir ezers? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ar cie?u, Toms. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:50:54 +0200 >>>>>>>>>>> Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Nu gadu vi?? netais?j?s :) Tagad esmu atradis laiku beidzot >>>>>>>>>>> pie?erties >>>>>>>>>>> k?rt?gi kl?t un tuv?kaj? laik? dom?ju piebeigt.. Galven? probl?ma >>>>>>>>>>> bija >>>>>>>>>>> taj? apst?kl?, ka blakus novadu robe?as, kur vi??m vajadz?tu iet >>>>>>>>>>> visam >>>>>>>>>>> smuki vienai l?nijai starp diviem novadiem, ir vietas, kur k?ds >>>>>>>>>>> punkts >>>>>>>>>>> nesakr?t... Bet nu jau to liekas, ka b?s izdevies veiksm?gi >>>>>>>>>>> apstr?d?t, ta, ka nav vairs daudz palicis l?dz fini?am. >>>>>>>>>>> Lauris >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2011. gada 21. janv?ris 14:28 Viesturs Zarins >>>>>>>>>>> rakst?ja: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ehh, nu jau gadu ka vins tais?s. >>>>>>>>>>> Kad ta beidzot b?s gatavs? >>>>>>>>>>> Viesturs >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 10:12 Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> rakst?ja: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Tiek tais?ts skripts, kas no shapefile form?ta p?rkonvert? tos uz >>>>>>>>>>> OSM. >>>>>>>>>>> Dati ir par visiem novadiem, valsts noz?mes pils?t?m, k? ar? >>>>>>>>>>> pils?t?m, >>>>>>>>>>> kas bija rajonu centri. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Lauris >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 10:06 ? ? ?rakst?ja: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sveiks, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> varb?t uzskaiti ?trum? k?d?m pils?tam jau tiek gatavotas robe?as >>>>>>>>>>>> (vai >>>>>>>>>>>> otr?di >>>>>>>>>>>> kur?m n?) es tad tais??u p?r?j?m. >>>>>>>>>>>> P.S. Ko noz?m? "gatavo datus" ? Vai tad var tos sagatavot un >>>>>>>>>>>> import?t.ar >>>>>>>>>>>> skriptiem? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ar cie?u, Toms >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:41:07 +0200 >>>>>>>>>>>> Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ja nav ?oti steidzami, tad neb?tu v?lams, jo tuv?k? m?ne?a laik? >>>>>>>>>>>>> pabeig?u sagatavot datus ar prec?z?m robe??m, ko ieimport?t un >>>>>>>>>>>>> tad >>>>>>>>>>>>> atkal neprec?z?s robe?as b?s j?iet un manu?li j?dz?? lauk?. Tas >>>>>>>>>>>>> gan >>>>>>>>>>>>> tikai novadiem un pils?t?m... Ja vajag ?oti steidzami un gatavs >>>>>>>>>>>>> p?c >>>>>>>>>>>>> importa neprec?z?s robe?as dz?st lauk?, tad dro?i :) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Lauris >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Talk-lv mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Talk-lv mailing list >>>>>>>>>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Talk-lv mailing list >>>>>>>>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>>>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Talk-lv mailing list >>>>>>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Talk-lv mailing list >>>>>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Talk-lv mailing list >>>>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Talk-lv mailing list >>>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-lv mailing list >>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >> >> > From lafriks at gmail.com Mon Jan 24 14:50:13 2011 From: lafriks at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Lauris_Buk=C5=A1is=2DHaberkorns?=) Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:50:13 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?dmFqYWR6xKtnYXMgcGlsc8STdHUgcm9iZcW+YXM=?= In-Reply-To: References: <4D3D513A.9000601@gmail.com> <4D3D66A6.3020601@gmail.com> <4D3D7B66.5080504@gmail.com> Message-ID: 11. l?me?i ir tikai lielaj?m valst?m, dom?ju, ka mums tas nav vajadz?gs. Viens?tas gan jau, ka nevajag. T?pat diez vai m?s t?dus datus tik detaliz?tus dab?sim un diez vai k?ds ar roku vi?us grib?s z?m?t :) Man ar liekas, ka priek?pils?tas vajadz?tu, bet manis p?c vi?as var atz?m?t ar? k? sav?d?k. K?p?c priek?pils?tas augst?k? l?men? k? ciemus? Lauris 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 16:29 rakst?ja: > Sveiks, > > viens?tu robe?as manupr?t nav tik baigi vajadz?gas, lab?k jau iek?aut > priek?pils?tas, bet ja nu tom?r tad var?tu ja v?l dr?kst viens?tas likt 11. > l?meni? > > ... > 9-Priek?pils?tas > 10-Ciemi > 11-Viens?tas > > Toms. > > 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 15:41 Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns > rakst?ja: > >> Valsts robe?ai ir j?b?t 2, jo t? ir visur OSM, p?r?jie attiec?gi tad >> pab?d?s +1. Pagastus un pils?tas man tom?r grib?tos redz?t ar? >> atsevi??os l?me?os, jo kad pie?ems kaut k?du iesp?ju aprakst?t >> noklus?t?s v?rt?bas valsts l?men? (max_speed etc), tad b?tu labi, ja >> pils?tas var?tu viegli at??irt. Priek?pils?t?m nav ofici?la statusa, >> tas tiesa, bet ikdien? cilv?ki t?s lieto t?, ka iesp?jams t?s ir >> j?iez?m? ar citu boundary tipu.. Izskat?s, ka pils?tam, liel?koties >> izmanto 8 l?meni, tad man san?k ??ds izk?rtojums: >> >> 2-Valsts robe?a >> 3-Apri??i/apgabali (v?l neeksist?) >> 4-Republikas pils?tas >> 5-Novadi >> 6-N/A >> 7-Pagasti >> 8-Pils?tas >> 9-Ciemi >> 10-Viens?tas >> >> Lauris >> >> 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 15:15 P?teris Br?ns >> rakst?ja: >>> >>> Pareizi, nepietiekami iedzilin?jos un noputroju ar CSB statistikas >>> apgabaliem. >>> >>> Man san?k ?o pas?kumu dal?t div?s da??s - oficil?l? un neofici?l?. >>> >>> Ja ?em v?r? http://www.likumi.lv/doc.php?id=185993 san?k: >>> 1-Valsts robe?a >>> 2-Apri??i/apgabali (v?l neeksist?) >>> 3-Republikas pils?tas >>> 4-Novadi un teritorial?s vien?bas >>> 5-Pagasti un pils?tas (san?k vien? l?men?) >>> 6-ciemi >>> >>> Ja iesp?jams ??di to b?tu j?m??ina patur?t, jo sav?d?k san?ks >>> interpret?cija >>> un k?dam vienm?r b?s j?seko l?dz un j?sp?j samapot likums->osm >>> klasifik?cija. Ticu, ka izmai?as neb?s par?k daudz bet mainot k?rt?bu t? >>> neb?s atbilsto?a patiesajai situ?cijai. >>> Priek?pils?t?m nav ne jausmas cik ofici?ls ir statuss, bet apkaimes ir >>> nedzudz ar pirkstu m?ko?os rad?ta klasifik?cija, vismaz R?gas gad?jum?, >>> un >>> ofici?la statusa t?m nav, dr?z?k v?sturiska. >>> >>> pb >>> >>> On 2011.01.24. 14:15, Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >>>> >>>> Bet tur nav ko p?r?emt. NUTS3 ir statistiskie re?ioni, kas Latviju >>>> iedala 6 re?ionos, kas nav administrat?vie re?ioni. Pied?v? l?dzu >>>> konkr?tu variantu k? tavupr?t tam b?tu j?izskat?s, tad ar? varam t?l?k >>>> diskut?t, sav?d?k t?da tuk?a salmu kul?ana vien san?k :) >>>> >>>> Lauris >>>> >>>> 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 13:46 P?teris Br?ns >>>> ?rakst?ja: >>>>> >>>>> Nav runa par kop??anu vai ieb??anu ?aj? sh?m?, tas bija tikai idej?m ?+ >>>>> NUTS >>>>> kodi l?dz zin?mam l?menim ir savietojami un p?rmantot pasaul? zin?mu >>>>> klasifik?ciju neb?tu tas sliktakais. ??iet CSB vai kaut kur citur >>>>> jaunajiem >>>>> novadiem NUTS3 kodi bija public?ti. >>>>> >>>>> pb >>>>> >>>>> On 2011.01.24. 13:26, Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Manupr?t tas gal?gi nav tas... LV tur ir sadal?ta 5 re?ionos un >>>>>> viss... Katrai valstij ir savi administrat?vie l?me?i un t?p?c jau ir >>>>>> t? tabula, kur tos aprakst?t. Man negrib?tos, ka tiek sagr?stas >>>>>> da??das lietas vien?, jo tom?r novads ir novads un pils?ta ir pils?ta >>>>>> t?pat k? pagasti un visi p?r?jie iedal?jumi. Var diskut?t kuru likt >>>>>> augst?k valsts noz?mes pils?tu vai novadu un pagastu vai pils?tu un >>>>>> kuros tie?i l?me?os likt, bet tas ar? viss... >>>>>> >>>>>> Pa?reiz ir: >>>>>> 2 - valsts robe?a >>>>>> 3, 4 - N/A (viens no ?iem ir j?rezerv? apgabaliem, kad t?dus izdom?s >>>>>> tom?r pie?emt) >>>>>> 5 - valsts noz?mes pils?tas >>>>>> 6 - novadi >>>>>> 7 - pils?tas >>>>>> 8 - pagasti >>>>>> 9 - ciemi >>>>>> 10 - priek?pils?tas >>>>>> >>>>>> Mans pied?v?tais variants tad pa?laik b?tu: >>>>>> 2 - valsts robe?a >>>>>> 3 - N/A (?is ir j?rezerv? apgabaliem, kad t?dus izdom?s tom?r pie?emt) >>>>>> 4 - N/A >>>>>> 5 - valsts noz?mes pils?tas >>>>>> 6 - novadi >>>>>> 7 - pagasti >>>>>> 8 - pils?tas >>>>>> 9 - ciemi >>>>>> 10 - priek?pils?tas >>>>>> >>>>>> V?l var dom?t par valsts noz?mes pils?tu un novadu lik?anu 4, 5 vai 6 >>>>>> l?men?.. >>>>>> >>>>>> Lauris >>>>>> >>>>>> 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 12:15 P?teris Br?ns >>>>>> ?rakst?ja: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Paskat?ties uz principu k?du izmanto NUTS >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/nuts_nomenclature/introduction). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> pb >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2011.01.24. 11:52, Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nu vien?gais, ko tur var?tu dar?t ir apvienot valsts noz?mes >>>>>>>> pils?tas >>>>>>>> un novadus vien? l?men?, un pagastus un pils?tas ar? kop? vien? >>>>>>>> l?men?... bet nu person?gi man negrib?tos da??das lietas likt kop?.. >>>>>>>> vair?k tur ar? neko nevar izdar?t... Ir k?di pied?v?jumi? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Lauris >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 11:33 Viesturs Zarins >>>>>>>> ?rakst?ja: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Tapec ka neiet nekadi kopa ar citu valstu aprakstiem. Un pats >>>>>>>>> saproti >>>>>>>>> kapec >>>>>>>>> tas ir svarigi. >>>>>>>>> Tur visp?r liels murgs ir un daudz?m valst?m ir miskaste. >>>>>>>>> Varag vienu lielu revamp. >>>>>>>>> Viesturs >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 10:03 Lauris >>>>>>>>> Buk?is-Haberkorns >>>>>>>>> rakst?ja: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Nu t?s mu???bas tur es sarakst?ju... tik jaut?jums k?p?c mu???bas? >>>>>>>>>> :) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Lauris >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2011. gada 23. janv?ris 13:03 Viesturs Zarins >>>>>>>>>> rakst?ja: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ar pils?tu robe??m ir ??p?gi. >>>>>>>>>>> Nelaime t? ka nav ?sti ofici?l?s sh?mas pils?tu robe?u >>>>>>>>>>> atz?m??anai. >>>>>>>>>>> Praks? >>>>>>>>>>> lieto admin_level=8 >>>>>>>>>>> Bet >>>>>>>>>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative >>>>>>>>>>> ir >>>>>>>>>>> Latvijai sarakst?tas piln?gas mu???bas. >>>>>>>>>>> Place_name= nav j?lieto, j?lieto ir tikai name=. >>>>>>>>>>> Skat http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place_name >>>>>>>>>>> Robe?u ar pils?tas nodi saista kop? ar rel?ciju. >>>>>>>>>>> Skat http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary >>>>>>>>>>> Probl?mas, protams, s?kas eksport?jot datus uz citiem form?tiem, >>>>>>>>>>> jo >>>>>>>>>>> ?is >>>>>>>>>>> standarts ir diezgan jauns un eksport??anas r?ki v?l nav >>>>>>>>>>> piel?goti. >>>>>>>>>>> Viesturs >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2011. gada 21. janv?ris 17:55 ? ? ?rakst?ja: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sveiki, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> l?dzu izskaidojiet k?ds tad mums ir tas v?lamais pils?tu robe?u >>>>>>>>>>>> tago?anas >>>>>>>>>>>> veids? >>>>>>>>>>>> Patreiz kart? redzu divus variantus kas abi ir teor?tiski >>>>>>>>>>>> pareizi: >>>>>>>>>>>> a) boundary=administrative, place_name=nosaukums >>>>>>>>>>>> vai >>>>>>>>>>>> b) place=city/town/village/hamlet, name=nosaukums >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sakar? ar to paman?ju ka C?su un Valmieras robe??s var?tu b?t >>>>>>>>>>>> k??da >>>>>>>>>>>> (boundary=administrative, name=Nosaukums) vai tad tur >>>>>>>>>>>> nevajadz?tu >>>>>>>>>>>> likt >>>>>>>>>>>> place_name=Nosaukums? Var?ju jau uzreiz pats pam??in?t izlabot, >>>>>>>>>>>> bet >>>>>>>>>>>> dro??bas >>>>>>>>>>>> labad vispirms pajaut?ju. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Un kas b?tu j?dara (piem. Raiskums) vai b?tu j?nosl?dz tr?ksto?? >>>>>>>>>>>> pils?tas >>>>>>>>>>>> robe?a pa ?deni ja blakus ir ezers? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ar cie?u, Toms. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:50:54 +0200 >>>>>>>>>>>> Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nu gadu vi?? netais?j?s :) Tagad esmu atradis laiku beidzot >>>>>>>>>>>> pie?erties >>>>>>>>>>>> k?rt?gi kl?t un tuv?kaj? laik? dom?ju piebeigt.. Galven? >>>>>>>>>>>> probl?ma >>>>>>>>>>>> bija >>>>>>>>>>>> taj? apst?kl?, ka blakus novadu robe?as, kur vi??m vajadz?tu iet >>>>>>>>>>>> visam >>>>>>>>>>>> smuki vienai l?nijai starp diviem novadiem, ir vietas, kur k?ds >>>>>>>>>>>> punkts >>>>>>>>>>>> nesakr?t... Bet nu jau to liekas, ka b?s izdevies veiksm?gi >>>>>>>>>>>> apstr?d?t, ta, ka nav vairs daudz palicis l?dz fini?am. >>>>>>>>>>>> Lauris >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2011. gada 21. janv?ris 14:28 Viesturs >>>>>>>>>>>> Zarins >>>>>>>>>>>> rakst?ja: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ehh, nu jau gadu ka vins tais?s. >>>>>>>>>>>> Kad ta beidzot b?s gatavs? >>>>>>>>>>>> Viesturs >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 10:12 Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> rakst?ja: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Tiek tais?ts skripts, kas no shapefile form?ta p?rkonvert? tos >>>>>>>>>>>> uz >>>>>>>>>>>> OSM. >>>>>>>>>>>> Dati ir par visiem novadiem, valsts noz?mes pils?t?m, k? ar? >>>>>>>>>>>> pils?t?m, >>>>>>>>>>>> kas bija rajonu centri. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Lauris >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2011. gada 19. janv?ris 10:06 ? ? ?rakst?ja: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sveiks, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> varb?t uzskaiti ?trum? k?d?m pils?tam jau tiek gatavotas >>>>>>>>>>>>> robe?as >>>>>>>>>>>>> (vai >>>>>>>>>>>>> otr?di >>>>>>>>>>>>> kur?m n?) es tad tais??u p?r?j?m. >>>>>>>>>>>>> P.S. Ko noz?m? "gatavo datus" ? Vai tad var tos sagatavot un >>>>>>>>>>>>> import?t.ar >>>>>>>>>>>>> skriptiem? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ar cie?u, Toms >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:41:07 +0200 >>>>>>>>>>>>> Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ja nav ?oti steidzami, tad neb?tu v?lams, jo tuv?k? m?ne?a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> laik? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> pabeig?u sagatavot datus ar prec?z?m robe??m, ko ieimport?t un >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tad >>>>>>>>>>>>>> atkal neprec?z?s robe?as b?s j?iet un manu?li j?dz?? lauk?. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tas >>>>>>>>>>>>>> gan >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tikai novadiem un pils?t?m... Ja vajag ?oti steidzami un >>>>>>>>>>>>>> gatavs >>>>>>>>>>>>>> p?c >>>>>>>>>>>>>> importa neprec?z?s robe?as dz?st lauk?, tad dro?i :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lauris > From richlv at nakts.net Mon Jan 24 14:52:58 2011 From: richlv at nakts.net (Rich) Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:52:58 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?dmFqYWR6xKtnYXMgcGlsc8STdHUgcm9iZcW+YXM=?= In-Reply-To: References: <4D3D513A.9000601@gmail.com> <4D3D66A6.3020601@gmail.com> <4D3D7B66.5080504@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4D3D924A.8060406@nakts.net> On 01/24/11 16:50, Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: > 11. l?me?i ir tikai lielaj?m valst?m, dom?ju, ka mums tas nav > vajadz?gs. Viens?tas gan jau, ka nevajag. T?pat diez vai m?s t?dus > datus tik detaliz?tus dab?sim un diez vai k?ds ar roku vi?us grib?s baltkrievi saimporteeja visaadas viienseetas da hamletus - ja nu kaadreiz dati ienaakas, paredzeet klasifikaacijaa jau par ljaunu nebuus > z?m?t :) Man ar liekas, ka priek?pils?tas vajadz?tu, bet manis p?c > vi?as var atz?m?t ar? k? sav?d?k. K?p?c priek?pils?tas augst?k? l?men? > k? ciemus? > > Lauris > > 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 16:29 rakst?ja: >> Sveiks, >> >> viens?tu robe?as manupr?t nav tik baigi vajadz?gas, lab?k jau iek?aut >> priek?pils?tas, bet ja nu tom?r tad var?tu ja v?l dr?kst viens?tas likt 11. >> l?meni? >> >> ... >> 9-Priek?pils?tas >> 10-Ciemi >> 11-Viens?tas >> >> Toms. ... -- Rich From tfr at apollo.lv Mon Jan 24 23:38:33 2011 From: tfr at apollo.lv (tfr at apollo.lv) Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 01:38:33 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?VXp6xKttxJNqdSBhcHR1dmVudSBSxKtnYXMgcm9iZcW+?= =?utf-8?q?as_pagaidu_multipoligonu?= Message-ID: Sveicin?ti, tikko uztais?ju aptuvenu pagaidu R?gas robe?as multipoligonu (m?r?is - eksporta test??ana)(http://img641.imageshack.us/i/rigatempmultipoligons.png/). Z?m?ts JOSM? sv?trot? zon? neko neiel?d?jot (vai ir k?ds lab?ks veids?) - t? k? v?l nezinu vai visp?r par?d?sies kart?. Biki? nohalt?r?ju iek?aujot Me??res un Spilvi iek?? R?g?. Ja k?dam tas trauc? bez ierunas izdz?s??u, bet b?tu labi lai poligons past?v vismaz l?dz tre?dienai? Pie??irtie tagi: admin_level=4 (lai redz?tu atsevi??i OSM Inspector - boundaries) boundary=administrative name=R?ga place=city ar cie?u, Toms. From richlv at nakts.net Tue Jan 25 08:28:06 2011 From: richlv at nakts.net (Rich) Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:28:06 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?VXp6xKttxJNqdSBhcHR1dmVudSBSxKtnYXMgcm9iZcW+?= =?utf-8?q?as_pagaidu_multipoligonu?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4D3E8996.9000804@nakts.net> On 01/25/11 01:38, tfr at apollo.lv wrote: > Sveicin?ti, > > > tikko uztais?ju aptuvenu pagaidu R?gas robe?as multipoligonu (m?r?is - > eksporta > test??ana)(http://img641.imageshack.us/i/rigatempmultipoligons.png/). > Z?m?ts JOSM? sv?trot? zon? neko neiel?d?jot (vai ir k?ds lab?ks veids?) > - t? k? v?l nezinu vai visp?r par?d?sies kart?. Biki? nohalt?r?ju > iek?aujot Me??res un Spilvi iek?? R?g?. > > Ja k?dam tas trauc? bez ierunas izdz?s??u, bet b?tu labi lai poligons > past?v vismaz l?dz tre?dienai? grmh, es taa sapr, ka jau uploadots... tagad jau par veelu, bet turpmaak "eksperimentus/testus" labaak neuploadot, jo nominatim searchu var sajaat. a tur shobriid migreejot uz jaunu sisteemu taapat daraamaa pietiek... > Pie??irtie tagi: > admin_level=4 (lai redz?tu atsevi??i OSM Inspector - boundaries) > boundary=administrative > name=R?ga > place=city > > > ar cie?u, Toms. -- Rich From tfr at apollo.lv Tue Jan 25 10:18:03 2011 From: tfr at apollo.lv (tfr at apollo.lv) Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:18:03 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?VXp6xKttxJNqdSBhcHR1dmVudSBSxKtnYXMgcm9iZcW+?= =?utf-8?q?as___pagaidu_multipoligonu?= In-Reply-To: <4D3E8996.9000804@nakts.net> References: <4D3E8996.9000804@nakts.net> Message-ID: Sveiki, pagaidu robe?a nesen par?d?j?s kart?, mekl??an? pagaid?m izmai?u nav. Cik saprotu kam?r t? nav piln?b? sagremojusies lab?k b?tu neaiztikt, kaut gan var?tu m??in?t to blo??t vai izdz?st jau tagad? Pats jebkur? gad?jum? vi?u neaiztik?u lai neb?tu v?l liel?ka ziepe... Turpm?k apsolos ?adus eksperimentus neatk?rtot. ar cie?u, Toms. On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:28:06 +0200 Rich wrote: > grmh, es taa sapr, ka jau uploadots... > tagad jau par veelu, bet turpmaak "eksperimentus/testus" >labaak neuploadot, jo nominatim searchu var sajaat. a tur >shobriid migreejot uz jaunu sisteemu taapat daraamaa >pietiek... > >> On 01/25/11 01:38, tfr at apollo.lv wrote: >> Sveicin?ti, >> >> >> tikko uztais?ju aptuvenu pagaidu R?gas robe?as multipoligonu (m?r?is - eksporta test??ana)(http://img641.imageshack.us/i/rigatempmultipoligons.png/). >> Z?m?ts JOSM? sv?trot? zon? neko neiel?d?jot (vai ir k?ds lab?ks veids?) >> - t? k? v?l nezinu vai visp?r par?d?sies kart?. Biki? nohalt?r?ju iek?aujot Me??res un Spilvi iek?? R?g?. >> >> Ja k?dam tas trauc? bez ierunas izdz?s??u, bet b?tu labi lai poligons past?v vismaz l?dz tre?dienai? >> >> Pie??irtie tagi: >> admin_level=4 (lai redz?tu atsevi??i OSM Inspector - >>boundaries) >> boundary=administrative >> name=R?ga >> place=city >> >> >> ar cie?u, Toms. > -- > Rich From janis.rocans at gmail.com Tue Jan 25 22:28:18 2011 From: janis.rocans at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?SsSBbmlzIFJvxI3EgW5z?=) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 00:28:18 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] 9. autobuss Message-ID: Sveiki! Vai k?ds nevar?tu uzmest aci 9. autobusa mar?rutam? M??in?ju pirmo reizi izveidot mar?rutu (p?c atmi?as). Paskatieties, l?dzu! Paldies, J?nis -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From instigater at projektam.lv Wed Jan 26 06:23:24 2011 From: instigater at projektam.lv (Instigater) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 08:23:24 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] 9. autobuss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4D3FBDDC.20104@projektam.lv> On 26.01.2011 00:28, J?nis Ro??ns wrote: > Sveiki! > > Vai k?ds nevar?tu uzmest aci 9. autobusa mar?rutam? M??in?ju pirmo > reizi izveidot mar?rutu (p?c atmi?as). Paskatieties, l?dzu! > Kas liedz pakonsult?ties zem?k ievietotaj? link?? http://saraksti.rigassatiksme.lv/?a=p.routes&transport_id=search&l=lv -- Instigater Serveru noma Latvenergo datu centr? - s?kot no 10.50 Ls/m?n www.projektam.lv From janis.rocans at gmail.com Wed Jan 26 06:25:32 2011 From: janis.rocans at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?SsSBbmlzIFJvxI3EgW5z?=) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 08:25:32 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] 9. autobuss In-Reply-To: <4D3FBDDC.20104@projektam.lv> References: <4D3FBDDC.20104@projektam.lv> Message-ID: Mani interes? tie?i tehniskais izpild?jums, jo routes v?l neesmu tais?jis. 2011/1/26 Instigater > On 26.01.2011 00:28, J?nis Ro??ns wrote: > >> Sveiki! >> >> Vai k?ds nevar?tu uzmest aci 9. autobusa mar?rutam? M??in?ju pirmo reizi >> izveidot mar?rutu (p?c atmi?as). Paskatieties, l?dzu! >> >> Kas liedz pakonsult?ties zem?k ievietotaj? link?? > http://saraksti.rigassatiksme.lv/?a=p.routes&transport_id=search&l=lv > > -- > Instigater > Serveru noma Latvenergo datu centr? - s?kot no 10.50 Ls/m?n > www.projektam.lv > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From karlis at gunta.lv Wed Jan 26 15:09:53 2011 From: karlis at gunta.lv (=?utf-8?B?S8SBcmxpcw==?=) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:09:53 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] 9. autobuss In-Reply-To: <4D3FBDDC.20104@projektam.lv> References: <4D3FBDDC.20104@projektam.lv> Message-ID: Es ikdien? brauk?ju mar?rut? ?ertr?des iela - Policijas akad?mija. Idejiski ir treks ar atz?m?t?m pietur?m, neesmu skat?jies cik prec?zs. Ja vajag varu izbrauk?t visu. Man ar bail iez?m?t, neesmu ar to darbojies. > On 26.01.2011 00:28, J?nis Ro??ns wrote: >> Sveiki! >> >> Vai k?ds nevar?tu uzmest aci 9. autobusa mar?rutam? M??in?ju pirmo >> reizi izveidot mar?rutu (p?c atmi?as). Paskatieties, l?dzu! >> > Kas liedz pakonsult?ties zem?k ievietotaj? link?? > http://saraksti.rigassatiksme.lv/?a=p.routes&transport_id=search&l=lv > -- Ar cie?u K?rlis ?teinbergs From polis.gints at gmail.com Wed Jan 26 16:46:39 2011 From: polis.gints at gmail.com (Gints Polis) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:46:39 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] 9. autobuss In-Reply-To: References: <4D3FBDDC.20104@projektam.lv> Message-ID: Nu p?c savas sapra?anas :). Skat?jos ka ?is mar?ruts http://saraksti.rigassatiksme.lv/?a=p.routes&transport_id=bus&t=xhtml&l=lv#2870_15_56.98283_24.17537 iet pa ?iekurkalna 1 .l?niju. Iel?d?ju bet nek?du rel?ciju tur neredz?ju. Cik saprotu mar?ruti j?taisa k? rel?cijas. Turpat blakus ir iez?m?ts 6 tramvajs. To var ?emt par piem?ru. Ceru labo?anai tu izmanto JOSM. Gints. 2011. gada 26. janv?ris 17:09 K?rlis rakst?ja: > Es ikdien? brauk?ju mar?rut? ?ertr?des iela - Policijas akad?mija. > Idejiski ir treks ar atz?m?t?m pietur?m, neesmu skat?jies cik prec?zs. > Ja vajag varu izbrauk?t visu. > Man ar bail iez?m?t, neesmu ar to darbojies. > > > On 26.01.2011 00:28, J?nis Ro??ns wrote: >> >>> Sveiki! >>> >>> Vai k?ds nevar?tu uzmest aci 9. autobusa mar?rutam? M??in?ju pirmo reizi >>> izveidot mar?rutu (p?c atmi?as). Paskatieties, l?dzu! >>> >>> Kas liedz pakonsult?ties zem?k ievietotaj? link?? >> http://saraksti.rigassatiksme.lv/?a=p.routes&transport_id=search&l=lv >> >> > > -- > Ar cie?u > K?rlis ?teinbergs > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From janis.rocans at gmail.com Wed Jan 26 20:12:22 2011 From: janis.rocans at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?SsSBbmlzIFJvxI3EgW5z?=) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:12:22 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] 9. autobuss In-Reply-To: References: <4D3FBDDC.20104@projektam.lv> Message-ID: Protams, ka JOSM, m??in?ju to public transport pluginu. Es prasu, jo nekad neesmu neko t?du dar?jis un nezinu, kur mekl?t manu?li tam. 2011/1/26 Gints Polis > Nu p?c savas sapra?anas :). > > Skat?jos ka ?is mar?ruts > > > http://saraksti.rigassatiksme.lv/?a=p.routes&transport_id=bus&t=xhtml&l=lv#2870_15_56.98283_24.17537 > > iet pa ?iekurkalna 1 .l?niju. Iel?d?ju bet nek?du rel?ciju tur neredz?ju. > Cik saprotu mar?ruti j?taisa k? rel?cijas. Turpat blakus ir iez?m?ts 6 > tramvajs. To var ?emt par piem?ru. > Ceru labo?anai tu izmanto JOSM. > > Gints. > > 2011. gada 26. janv?ris 17:09 K?rlis rakst?ja: > > Es ikdien? brauk?ju mar?rut? ?ertr?des iela - Policijas akad?mija. >> Idejiski ir treks ar atz?m?t?m pietur?m, neesmu skat?jies cik prec?zs. >> Ja vajag varu izbrauk?t visu. >> Man ar bail iez?m?t, neesmu ar to darbojies. >> >> >> On 26.01.2011 00:28, J?nis Ro??ns wrote: >>> >>>> Sveiki! >>>> >>>> Vai k?ds nevar?tu uzmest aci 9. autobusa mar?rutam? M??in?ju pirmo reizi >>>> izveidot mar?rutu (p?c atmi?as). Paskatieties, l?dzu! >>>> >>>> Kas liedz pakonsult?ties zem?k ievietotaj? link?? >>> http://saraksti.rigassatiksme.lv/?a=p.routes&transport_id=search&l=lv >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Ar cie?u >> K?rlis ?teinbergs >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-lv mailing list >> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From polis.gints at gmail.com Thu Jan 27 07:55:53 2011 From: polis.gints at gmail.com (Gints Polis) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:55:53 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] 9. autobuss In-Reply-To: References: <4D3FBDDC.20104@projektam.lv> Message-ID: Es s?kum? pied?v?tu uztais?t route ar roci?u. Bez k?du plugin pal?dz?bas. Ja tais?si l?dz?gi k? ir jau uztais?ts 6 tramvajs nekam sliktam nevajag notikt. Gints 2011. gada 26. janv?ris 22:12 J?nis Ro??ns rakst?ja: > Protams, ka JOSM, m??in?ju to public transport pluginu. > Es prasu, jo nekad neesmu neko t?du dar?jis un nezinu, kur mekl?t manu?li > tam. > > 2011/1/26 Gints Polis > > Nu p?c savas sapra?anas :). >> >> Skat?jos ka ?is mar?ruts >> >> >> http://saraksti.rigassatiksme.lv/?a=p.routes&transport_id=bus&t=xhtml&l=lv#2870_15_56.98283_24.17537 >> >> iet pa ?iekurkalna 1 .l?niju. Iel?d?ju bet nek?du rel?ciju tur neredz?ju. >> Cik saprotu mar?ruti j?taisa k? rel?cijas. Turpat blakus ir iez?m?ts 6 >> tramvajs. To var ?emt par piem?ru. >> Ceru labo?anai tu izmanto JOSM. >> >> Gints. >> >> 2011. gada 26. janv?ris 17:09 K?rlis rakst?ja: >> >> Es ikdien? brauk?ju mar?rut? ?ertr?des iela - Policijas akad?mija. >>> Idejiski ir treks ar atz?m?t?m pietur?m, neesmu skat?jies cik prec?zs. >>> Ja vajag varu izbrauk?t visu. >>> Man ar bail iez?m?t, neesmu ar to darbojies. >>> >>> >>> On 26.01.2011 00:28, J?nis Ro??ns wrote: >>>> >>>>> Sveiki! >>>>> >>>>> Vai k?ds nevar?tu uzmest aci 9. autobusa mar?rutam? M??in?ju pirmo >>>>> reizi izveidot mar?rutu (p?c atmi?as). Paskatieties, l?dzu! >>>>> >>>>> Kas liedz pakonsult?ties zem?k ievietotaj? link?? >>>> http://saraksti.rigassatiksme.lv/?a=p.routes&transport_id=search&l=lv >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ar cie?u >>> K?rlis ?teinbergs >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-lv mailing list >>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-lv mailing list >> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tfr at apollo.lv Thu Jan 27 09:47:14 2011 From: tfr at apollo.lv (tfr at apollo.lv) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:47:14 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?RndkOiAgUsSrZ2FzIGVrc3BlcmltZW50xIFsxIEgcm9i?= =?utf-8?b?ZcW+YSAiPT91dGYtOD9RP2llc2w9QzQ9OTNkej1DND04MXM/PSI=?= Message-ID: Sveicin?ti, ?onakt mana eksperiment?la pagaidu robe?a "iesl?dz?s" - to tagad var redz?t ne tikai kart? bet ar? OSM inspektor? (http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=boundaries&lon=24.00000&lat=57.00000&zoom=10&opacity=0.80) L?dz ar to ir notiku?as izmai?as (ziepes?) mekl??an? - izskat?s ka tagad ir atsl?gusies ar? iepriek??j? admin_level=5 robe?a. Tagad ir jaut?jums vai var b?t t? ka rel?ciju izmai?as sakar? ar jauno pagaidu robe?u v?l joproj?m ir ce?? uz Nominatim? Vai, k? rakst?ja Rich, Nominatim search jau ir "saj?ts" ? Varb?t ka tom?r ir v?l j?uzgaida kam?r viss l?dz galam sagremojas? Esmu gatavs labot sadar?to, bet pieredzes un sapra?anas par robe?u rel?cij?m man v?l tr?kst - kur? zin, l?dzu uzmetiet aci Nominatim un uzrakstiet k? un ko tagad b?tu j?labo? ar cie?u, Toms. -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Subject: Re: [Talk-lv] Uzz?m?ju aptuvenu R?gas robe?as pagaidu multipoligonu Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:18:03 +0200 Size: 2010 URL: From richlv at nakts.net Thu Jan 27 10:00:53 2011 From: richlv at nakts.net (Rich) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:00:53 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?RndkOiBSxKtnYXMgZWtzcGVyaW1lbnTEgWzEgSByb2Jl?= =?utf-8?b?xb5hICI9P3V0Zi04P1E/aWVzbD1DND05M2R6PUM0PTgxcz89Ig==?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4D414255.20701@nakts.net> On 01/27/11 11:47, tfr at apollo.lv wrote: > Sveicin?ti, > > ?onakt mana eksperiment?la pagaidu robe?a "iesl?dz?s" - to tagad var > redz?t ne tikai kart? bet ar? OSM inspektor? > (http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=boundaries&lon=24.00000&lat=57.00000&zoom=10&opacity=0.80) > > L?dz ar to ir notiku?as izmai?as (ziepes?) mekl??an? - izskat?s ka tagad > ir atsl?gusies ar? iepriek??j? admin_level=5 robe?a. > Tagad ir jaut?jums vai var b?t t? ka rel?ciju izmai?as sakar? ar jauno > pagaidu robe?u v?l joproj?m ir ce?? uz Nominatim? Vai, k? rakst?ja Rich, > Nominatim search jau ir "saj?ts" ? Varb?t ka tom?r ir v?l j?uzgaida > kam?r viss l?dz galam sagremojas? relation, visticamaak, nonaaca ieksh nominatim db vienaa diffaa, liidz ar to labaak tur diez vai kas kljuus. domaaju, jaatiek galaa max aatri ar taam rajonu/pilseetu robezhaam un jaanes eksperimentaalaa nost > Esmu gatavs labot sadar?to, bet pieredzes un sapra?anas par robe?u > rel?cij?m man v?l tr?kst - kur? zin, l?dzu uzmetiet aci Nominatim un > uzrakstiet k? un ko tagad b?tu j?labo? > > ar cie?u, Toms. -- Rich From tfr at apollo.lv Thu Jan 27 11:21:02 2011 From: tfr at apollo.lv (tfr at apollo.lv) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:21:02 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?RndkOiBSxKtnYXMgZWtzcGVyaW1lbnTEgWzEgSByb2Jl?= =?utf-8?b?xb5hICJpZXNsZWR6YXMi?= In-Reply-To: <4D414255.20701@nakts.net> References: <4D414255.20701@nakts.net> Message-ID: On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:00:53 +0200 Rich wrote: > domaaju, jaatiek galaa max aatri ar taam rajonu/pilseetu >robezhaam un jaanes eksperimentaalaa nost Vai t? doma ir struktur?t/pielabot eso?o R?gas mikrorajonu un piegu?o?u pils?tu robe?u da??d?bu vai import?t piln?gi visu no jauna (Laura projekts?), un jau tad pielabot izn?kumu ar rok?m? Toms. > On 01/27/11 11:47, tfr at apollo.lv wrote: >> Sveicin?ti, >> >> ?onakt mana eksperiment?la pagaidu robe?a "iesl?dz?s" - >>to tagad var >> redz?t ne tikai kart? bet ar? OSM inspektor? >> (http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=boundaries&lon=24.00000&lat=57.00000&zoom=10&opacity=0.80) >> >> L?dz ar to ir notiku?as izmai?as (ziepes?) mekl??an? - >>izskat?s ka tagad >> ir atsl?gusies ar? iepriek??j? admin_level=5 robe?a. >> Tagad ir jaut?jums vai var b?t t? ka rel?ciju izmai?as >>sakar? ar jauno >> pagaidu robe?u v?l joproj?m ir ce?? uz Nominatim? Vai, >>k? rakst?ja Rich, >> Nominatim search jau ir "saj?ts" ? Varb?t ka tom?r ir >>v?l j?uzgaida >> kam?r viss l?dz galam sagremojas? > > relation, visticamaak, nonaaca ieksh nominatim db vienaa >diffaa, liidz ar to labaak tur diez vai kas kljuus. > domaaju, jaatiek galaa max aatri ar taam rajonu/pilseetu >robezhaam un jaanes eksperimentaalaa nost > >> Esmu gatavs labot sadar?to, bet pieredzes un sapra?anas >>par robe?u >> rel?cij?m man v?l tr?kst - kur? zin, l?dzu uzmetiet aci >>Nominatim un >> uzrakstiet k? un ko tagad b?tu j?labo? >> >> ar cie?u, Toms. > -- > Rich From richlv at nakts.net Thu Jan 27 12:05:33 2011 From: richlv at nakts.net (Rich) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:05:33 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?RndkOiBSxKtnYXMgZWtzcGVyaW1lbnTEgWzEgSByb2Jl?= =?utf-8?b?xb5hICJpZXNsZWR6YXMi?= In-Reply-To: References: <4D414255.20701@nakts.net> Message-ID: <4D415F8D.7000700@nakts.net> On 01/27/11 13:21, tfr at apollo.lv wrote: > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:00:53 +0200 > Rich wrote: > >> domaaju, jaatiek galaa max aatri ar taam rajonu/pilseetu robezhaam un >> jaanes eksperimentaalaa nost > > Vai t? doma ir struktur?t/pielabot eso?o R?gas mikrorajonu un piegu?o?u > pils?tu robe?u da??d?bu vai import?t piln?gi visu no jauna (Laura > projekts?), un jau tad pielabot izn?kumu ar rok?m? es nezinu :) shobriid man shkjiet, ka latvijas meerogaa importam buutu lielaaks potenciaals (shiis lietas tomeer dabaa iisti neizpeetiisi) - varbuut laurim vajag kaadu paliidziibu, lai to procesu paaatrinaatu ? > Toms. ... -- Rich From tfr at apollo.lv Thu Jan 27 13:11:40 2011 From: tfr at apollo.lv (tfr at apollo.lv) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:11:40 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?RndkOiBSxKtnYXMgZWtzcGVyaW1lbnTEgWzEgSByb2Jl?= =?utf-8?b?xb5hICJpZXNsZWR6YXMi?= In-Reply-To: <4D415F8D.7000700@nakts.net> References: <4D414255.20701@nakts.net> <4D415F8D.7000700@nakts.net> Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From viesturz at gmail.com Fri Jan 28 12:25:54 2011 From: viesturz at gmail.com (Viesturs Zarins) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:25:54 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?dmFqYWR6xKtnYXMgcGlsc8STdHUgcm9iZcW+YXM=?= In-Reply-To: <4D3D924A.8060406@nakts.net> References: <4D3D513A.9000601@gmail.com> <4D3D66A6.3020601@gmail.com> <4D3D7B66.5080504@gmail.com> <4D3D924A.8060406@nakts.net> Message-ID: Paskaidrojiet man k?p?c pils?tas ir sadal?tas tr?s nometn?s: 3,8,9. Apdz?vota vieta ir apdz?vota vieta. Un nesakiet ka t?p?c ka likum? ir 3 atsevi??i panti. Adre?u mekl?t?ji visi salien sev paka?? no ??da dal?juma. Ja gribam at??irt vienu no otra tad vienm?r ir place=city/town/village tags. 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 16:52 Rich rakst?ja: > On 01/24/11 16:50, Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: > >> 11. l?me?i ir tikai lielaj?m valst?m, dom?ju, ka mums tas nav >> vajadz?gs. Viens?tas gan jau, ka nevajag. T?pat diez vai m?s t?dus >> datus tik detaliz?tus dab?sim un diez vai k?ds ar roku vi?us grib?s >> > > baltkrievi saimporteeja visaadas viienseetas da hamletus - ja nu kaadreiz > dati ienaakas, paredzeet klasifikaacijaa jau par ljaunu nebuus > > > z?m?t :) Man ar liekas, ka priek?pils?tas vajadz?tu, bet manis p?c >> vi?as var atz?m?t ar? k? sav?d?k. K?p?c priek?pils?tas augst?k? l?men? >> k? ciemus? >> >> Lauris >> >> 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 16:29 rakst?ja: >> >>> Sveiks, >>> >>> viens?tu robe?as manupr?t nav tik baigi vajadz?gas, lab?k jau iek?aut >>> priek?pils?tas, bet ja nu tom?r tad var?tu ja v?l dr?kst viens?tas likt >>> 11. >>> l?meni? >>> >>> ... >>> 9-Priek?pils?tas >>> 10-Ciemi >>> 11-Viens?tas >>> >>> Toms. >>> >> ... > -- > Rich > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From viesturz at gmail.com Fri Jan 28 12:39:47 2011 From: viesturz at gmail.com (Viesturs Zarins) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:39:47 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?VXp6xKttxJNqdSBhcHR1dmVudSBSxKtnYXMgcm9iZcW+?= =?utf-8?q?as_pagaidu_multipoligonu?= In-Reply-To: References: <4D3E8996.9000804@nakts.net> Message-ID: Hmm, bet k? paliek ar pa?reiz?jo R?gas robe?u? Tur viena jau k?dus gadus divus k? st?v http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/90625 Tiesa gan g? multipoigons nevis viens way. Viesturs 2011. gada 25. janv?ris 12:18 rakst?ja: > Sveiki, > pagaidu robe?a nesen par?d?j?s kart?, mekl??an? pagaid?m izmai?u nav. > Cik saprotu kam?r t? nav piln?b? sagremojusies lab?k b?tu neaiztikt, kaut > gan var?tu m??in?t to blo??t vai izdz?st jau tagad? Pats jebkur? gad?jum? > vi?u neaiztik?u lai neb?tu v?l liel?ka ziepe... > Turpm?k apsolos ?adus eksperimentus neatk?rtot. > > ar cie?u, Toms. > > > On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:28:06 +0200 > Rich wrote: > > grmh, es taa sapr, ka jau uploadots... tagad jau par veelu, bet turpmaak >> "eksperimentus/testus" labaak neuploadot, jo nominatim searchu var sajaat. a >> tur shobriid migreejot uz jaunu sisteemu taapat daraamaa pietiek... >> >>> On 01/25/11 01:38, tfr at apollo.lv wrote: Sveicin?ti, >>> >>> tikko uztais?ju aptuvenu pagaidu R?gas robe?as multipoligonu (m?r?is - >>> eksporta test??ana)( >>> http://img641.imageshack.us/i/rigatempmultipoligons.png/). Z?m?ts JOSM? >>> sv?trot? zon? neko neiel?d?jot (vai ir k?ds lab?ks veids?) - t? k? v?l >>> nezinu vai visp?r par?d?sies kart?. Biki? nohalt?r?ju iek?aujot Me??res un >>> Spilvi iek?? R?g?. >>> Ja k?dam tas trauc? bez ierunas izdz?s??u, bet b?tu labi lai poligons >>> past?v vismaz l?dz tre?dienai? >>> Pie??irtie tagi: admin_level=4 (lai redz?tu atsevi??i OSM Inspector - >>> boundaries) boundary=administrative name=R?ga place=city >>> >>> ar cie?u, Toms. >>> >> -- >> Rich >> > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From orvils at gmail.com Fri Jan 28 12:58:39 2011 From: orvils at gmail.com (Raivis Dejus) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:58:39 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?VXp6xKttxJNqdSBhcHR1dmVudSBSxKtnYXMgcm9iZcW+?= =?utf-8?q?as_pagaidu_multipoligonu?= In-Reply-To: References: <4D3E8996.9000804@nakts.net> Message-ID: Mani pieci centi ?ai sarunai: Dom?ju, ka vajadz?tu sagaid?t Laura skriptu un salikt visas robe?as vien?di. V?rt?gs lik?s jaut?jums par to k? m?s varam Laurim pal?dz?t, lai ?? lieta notiktu? Ja Lauris ir aiz?emts, varb?t vi?? var apst?st?t izdar?to un k?ds cits var pabeigt ?o? Ja ikdienas darb?b? nav starp?bas starp vienu ce?u un multipolygon - proti, visi softi saprot multipolygon, tad dom?ju, ka j?paliek tai robe?ai, kas tika uzz?m?ta pirm?. 2011/1/28 Viesturs Zarins > Hmm, bet k? paliek ar pa?reiz?jo R?gas robe?u? Tur viena jau k?dus gadus > divus k? st?v http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/90625 > Tiesa gan g? multipoigons nevis viens way. > > Viesturs > > 2011. gada 25. janv?ris 12:18 rakst?ja: > > Sveiki, >> pagaidu robe?a nesen par?d?j?s kart?, mekl??an? pagaid?m izmai?u nav. >> Cik saprotu kam?r t? nav piln?b? sagremojusies lab?k b?tu neaiztikt, kaut >> gan var?tu m??in?t to blo??t vai izdz?st jau tagad? Pats jebkur? gad?jum? >> vi?u neaiztik?u lai neb?tu v?l liel?ka ziepe... >> Turpm?k apsolos ?adus eksperimentus neatk?rtot. >> >> ar cie?u, Toms. >> >> >> On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:28:06 +0200 >> Rich wrote: >> >> grmh, es taa sapr, ka jau uploadots... tagad jau par veelu, bet turpmaak >>> "eksperimentus/testus" labaak neuploadot, jo nominatim searchu var sajaat. a >>> tur shobriid migreejot uz jaunu sisteemu taapat daraamaa pietiek... >>> >>>> On 01/25/11 01:38, tfr at apollo.lv wrote: Sveicin?ti, >>>> >>>> tikko uztais?ju aptuvenu pagaidu R?gas robe?as multipoligonu (m?r?is - >>>> eksporta test??ana)( >>>> http://img641.imageshack.us/i/rigatempmultipoligons.png/). Z?m?ts JOSM? >>>> sv?trot? zon? neko neiel?d?jot (vai ir k?ds lab?ks veids?) - t? k? v?l >>>> nezinu vai visp?r par?d?sies kart?. Biki? nohalt?r?ju iek?aujot Me??res un >>>> Spilvi iek?? R?g?. >>>> Ja k?dam tas trauc? bez ierunas izdz?s??u, bet b?tu labi lai poligons >>>> past?v vismaz l?dz tre?dienai? >>>> Pie??irtie tagi: admin_level=4 (lai redz?tu atsevi??i OSM Inspector - >>>> boundaries) boundary=administrative name=R?ga place=city >>>> >>>> ar cie?u, Toms. >>>> >>> -- >>> Rich >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-lv mailing list >> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > > -- Cie??, Raivis Dejus Valdes loceklis SIA World Technology Frontier Tel.: 26457260 E-pasts: raivis at wtf.lv www.wtf.lv -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From raivis at wtf.lv Fri Jan 28 12:47:24 2011 From: raivis at wtf.lv (Raivis Dejus) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:47:24 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?VXp6xKttxJNqdSBhcHR1dmVudSBSxKtnYXMgcm9iZcW+?= =?utf-8?q?as_pagaidu_multipoligonu?= In-Reply-To: References: <4D3E8996.9000804@nakts.net> Message-ID: Mani pieci centi ?ai sarunai: Dom?ju, ka vajadz?tu sagaid?t Laura skriptu un salikt visas robe?as vien?di. V?rt?gs lik?s jaut?jums par to k? m?s varam Laurim pal?dz?t, lai ?? lieta notiktu? Ja Lauris ir aiz?emts, varb?t vi?? var apst?st?t izdar?to un k?ds cits var pabeigt ?o? Ja ikdienas darb?b? nav starp?bas starp vienu ce?u un multipolygon - proti, visi softi saorto multipolygon, tad dom?ju, ka j?paliek tai robe?ai, kas tika uzz?m?ta pirm?. 2011/1/28 Viesturs Zarins > Hmm, bet k? paliek ar pa?reiz?jo R?gas robe?u? Tur viena jau k?dus gadus > divus k? st?v http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/90625 > Tiesa gan g? multipoigons nevis viens way. > > Viesturs > > 2011. gada 25. janv?ris 12:18 rakst?ja: > >> Sveiki, >> pagaidu robe?a nesen par?d?j?s kart?, mekl??an? pagaid?m izmai?u nav. >> Cik saprotu kam?r t? nav piln?b? sagremojusies lab?k b?tu neaiztikt, kaut >> gan var?tu m??in?t to blo??t vai izdz?st jau tagad? Pats jebkur? gad?jum? >> vi?u neaiztik?u lai neb?tu v?l liel?ka ziepe... >> Turpm?k apsolos ?adus eksperimentus neatk?rtot. >> >> ar cie?u, Toms. >> >> >> On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:28:06 +0200 >> Rich wrote: >> >> grmh, es taa sapr, ka jau uploadots... tagad jau par veelu, bet turpmaak >>> "eksperimentus/testus" labaak neuploadot, jo nominatim searchu var sajaat. a >>> tur shobriid migreejot uz jaunu sisteemu taapat daraamaa pietiek... >>> >>>> On 01/25/11 01:38, tfr at apollo.lv wrote: Sveicin?ti, >>>> >>>> tikko uztais?ju aptuvenu pagaidu R?gas robe?as multipoligonu (m?r?is - >>>> eksporta test??ana)( >>>> http://img641.imageshack.us/i/rigatempmultipoligons.png/). Z?m?ts JOSM? >>>> sv?trot? zon? neko neiel?d?jot (vai ir k?ds lab?ks veids?) - t? k? v?l >>>> nezinu vai visp?r par?d?sies kart?. Biki? nohalt?r?ju iek?aujot Me??res un >>>> Spilvi iek?? R?g?. >>>> Ja k?dam tas trauc? bez ierunas izdz?s??u, bet b?tu labi lai poligons >>>> past?v vismaz l?dz tre?dienai? >>>> Pie??irtie tagi: admin_level=4 (lai redz?tu atsevi??i OSM Inspector - >>>> boundaries) boundary=administrative name=R?ga place=city >>>> >>>> ar cie?u, Toms. >>>> >>> -- >>> Rich >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-lv mailing list >> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > > -- Cie??, Raivis Dejus Valdes loceklis SIA World Technology Frontier Tel.: 26457260 E-pasts: raivis at wtf.lv www.wtf.lv -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From viesturz at gmail.com Sun Jan 30 16:58:43 2011 From: viesturz at gmail.com (Viesturs Zarins) Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:58:43 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?VXp6xKttxJNqdSBhcHR1dmVudSBSxKtnYXMgcm9iZcW+?= =?utf-8?q?as_pagaidu_multipoligonu?= In-Reply-To: References: <4D3E8996.9000804@nakts.net> Message-ID: ?oti negribu redz?t ka m?s ?akar?jam karti tikai t?p?c ka eso?ie eksporta skripti ir l?ki. Multipoligoni ir j?lieto un viss. Un ja tas nepat?k ,tad var: A1: Uzlabot eksporta r?kus, lai pie saprot visu k? vajag. A2: Aps?sties un uzrakst?t lab?ku redaktoru, kas atvieglo darbu ar multipoligoniem. B: Paiet mali?? un pagaid?t k?du gadi?u, kam?r to izdara k?ds cits. Mani 3 centi... 2011. gada 28. janv?ris 14:47 Raivis Dejus rakst?ja: > Mani pieci centi ?ai sarunai: Dom?ju, ka vajadz?tu sagaid?t Laura skriptu > un salikt visas robe?as vien?di. > > V?rt?gs lik?s jaut?jums par to k? m?s varam Laurim pal?dz?t, lai ?? lieta > notiktu? > Ja Lauris ir aiz?emts, varb?t vi?? var apst?st?t izdar?to un k?ds cits var > pabeigt ?o? > > > Ja ikdienas darb?b? nav starp?bas starp vienu ce?u un multipolygon - proti, > visi softi saorto multipolygon, tad dom?ju, ka j?paliek tai robe?ai, kas > tika uzz?m?ta pirm?. > > 2011/1/28 Viesturs Zarins > >> Hmm, bet k? paliek ar pa?reiz?jo R?gas robe?u? Tur viena jau k?dus gadus >> divus k? st?v http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/90625 >> Tiesa gan g? multipoigons nevis viens way. >> >> Viesturs >> >> 2011. gada 25. janv?ris 12:18 rakst?ja: >> >>> Sveiki, >>> pagaidu robe?a nesen par?d?j?s kart?, mekl??an? pagaid?m izmai?u nav. >>> Cik saprotu kam?r t? nav piln?b? sagremojusies lab?k b?tu neaiztikt, kaut >>> gan var?tu m??in?t to blo??t vai izdz?st jau tagad? Pats jebkur? gad?jum? >>> vi?u neaiztik?u lai neb?tu v?l liel?ka ziepe... >>> Turpm?k apsolos ?adus eksperimentus neatk?rtot. >>> >>> ar cie?u, Toms. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:28:06 +0200 >>> Rich wrote: >>> >>> grmh, es taa sapr, ka jau uploadots... tagad jau par veelu, bet turpmaak >>>> "eksperimentus/testus" labaak neuploadot, jo nominatim searchu var sajaat. a >>>> tur shobriid migreejot uz jaunu sisteemu taapat daraamaa pietiek... >>>> >>>>> On 01/25/11 01:38, tfr at apollo.lv wrote: Sveicin?ti, >>>>> >>>>> tikko uztais?ju aptuvenu pagaidu R?gas robe?as multipoligonu (m?r?is - >>>>> eksporta test??ana)( >>>>> http://img641.imageshack.us/i/rigatempmultipoligons.png/). Z?m?ts >>>>> JOSM? sv?trot? zon? neko neiel?d?jot (vai ir k?ds lab?ks veids?) - t? k? v?l >>>>> nezinu vai visp?r par?d?sies kart?. Biki? nohalt?r?ju iek?aujot Me??res un >>>>> Spilvi iek?? R?g?. >>>>> Ja k?dam tas trauc? bez ierunas izdz?s??u, bet b?tu labi lai poligons >>>>> past?v vismaz l?dz tre?dienai? >>>>> Pie??irtie tagi: admin_level=4 (lai redz?tu atsevi??i OSM Inspector - >>>>> boundaries) boundary=administrative name=R?ga place=city >>>>> >>>>> ar cie?u, Toms. >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Rich >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-lv mailing list >>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-lv mailing list >> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >> >> > > > -- > Cie??, > Raivis Dejus > Valdes loceklis > SIA World Technology Frontier > > Tel.: 26457260 > E-pasts: raivis at wtf.lv > www.wtf.lv > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lafriks at gmail.com Mon Jan 31 12:11:12 2011 From: lafriks at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Lauris_Buk=C5=A1is=2DHaberkorns?=) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:11:12 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?dmFqYWR6xKtnYXMgcGlsc8STdHUgcm9iZcW+YXM=?= In-Reply-To: References: <4D3D513A.9000601@gmail.com> <4D3D66A6.3020601@gmail.com> <4D3D7B66.5080504@gmail.com> <4D3D924A.8060406@nakts.net> Message-ID: Par 8 un 9 v?l var?tu padom?t par apvieno?anu, bet t? k? novads un valsts noz?mes pils?tas ir klasifik?cij? vien? l?men?, tad tom?r grib?tos ar?, ka kart? t?s par?d?s apm?ram vien? l?men?, nevis, ka s?kum? var redz?t tikai novadus un tur kur ir pils?tas ir robi... Lauris 2011. gada 28. janv?ris 14:25 Viesturs Zarins rakst?ja: > Paskaidrojiet man k?p?c pils?tas ir sadal?tas tr?s nometn?s: 3,8,9. > Apdz?vota vieta ir apdz?vota vieta. Un ?nesakiet ka t?p?c ka likum? ir 3 > atsevi??i panti. > Adre?u mekl?t?ji visi salien sev paka?? no ??da dal?juma. > Ja gribam at??irt vienu no otra tad vienm?r ir place=city/town/village tags. > > 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 16:52 Rich rakst?ja: >> >> On 01/24/11 16:50, Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: >>> >>> 11. l?me?i ir tikai lielaj?m valst?m, dom?ju, ka mums tas nav >>> vajadz?gs. Viens?tas gan jau, ka nevajag. T?pat diez vai m?s t?dus >>> datus tik detaliz?tus dab?sim un diez vai k?ds ar roku vi?us grib?s >> >> baltkrievi saimporteeja visaadas viienseetas da hamletus - ja nu kaadreiz >> dati ienaakas, paredzeet klasifikaacijaa jau par ljaunu nebuus >> >>> z?m?t :) Man ar liekas, ka priek?pils?tas vajadz?tu, bet manis p?c >>> vi?as var atz?m?t ar? k? sav?d?k. K?p?c priek?pils?tas augst?k? l?men? >>> k? ciemus? >>> >>> Lauris >>> >>> 2011. gada 24. janv?ris 16:29 ?rakst?ja: >>>> >>>> Sveiks, >>>> >>>> viens?tu robe?as manupr?t nav tik baigi vajadz?gas, lab?k jau iek?aut >>>> priek?pils?tas, bet ja nu tom?r tad var?tu ja v?l dr?kst viens?tas likt >>>> 11. >>>> l?meni? >>>> >>>> ... >>>> 9-Priek?pils?tas >>>> 10-Ciemi >>>> 11-Viens?tas >>>> >>>> Toms. >> >> ... >> -- >> ?Rich >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-lv mailing list >> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > > From lafriks at gmail.com Mon Jan 31 12:30:37 2011 From: lafriks at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Lauris_Buk=C5=A1is=2DHaberkorns?=) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:30:37 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?VXp6xKttxJNqdSBhcHR1dmVudSBSxKtnYXMgcm9iZcW+?= =?utf-8?q?as_pagaidu_multipoligonu?= In-Reply-To: References: <4D3E8996.9000804@nakts.net> Message-ID: Esmu nedaudz pavirz?jies uz priek?u... bet uztaisot pilno konvert?ciju, identific?ju v?l p?ris probl?mi?as, ko vajadz?tu uzlabot... Te b?s pa?reiz?jais st?voklis, ko skripts sagatavo: http://nix.lv/test.osm.bz2 Pa?laik tur iek?? nav multipoligonu, bet vi?u ?ener??anu pielikt kl?t ir 5 min??u darbs, trak?kais ir uzlabot algoritmu, lai visu smuki sadala pa l?nij?m (pa?laik izskat?s, ka ir probl?mas ar novadu/valsts pils?tu robe??m, jo n?k no da??diem shape failiem un ne visi punkti sakr?t.. k? ar? izskat?s, ka ir pazudis vismaz viens novads :) ) Protams, ja k?ds grib pal?dz?t un ir python zin??anas, varu pie??r?t skriptu... nepiecie?ams python un python-gdal Lauris 2011. gada 28. janv?ris 14:58 Raivis Dejus rakst?ja: > Mani pieci centi ?ai sarunai: Dom?ju, ka vajadz?tu sagaid?t Laura skriptu un > salikt visas robe?as vien?di. > > V?rt?gs lik?s jaut?jums par to k? m?s varam Laurim pal?dz?t, lai ?? lieta > notiktu? > Ja Lauris ir aiz?emts, varb?t vi?? var apst?st?t izdar?to un k?ds cits var > pabeigt ?o? > > > Ja ikdienas darb?b? nav starp?bas starp vienu ce?u un multipolygon - proti, > visi softi saprot multipolygon, tad dom?ju, ka j?paliek tai robe?ai, kas > tika uzz?m?ta pirm?. > > 2011/1/28 Viesturs Zarins >> >> Hmm, bet k? paliek ar pa?reiz?jo R?gas robe?u? Tur viena jau k?dus gadus >> divus k? st?v?http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/90625 >> Tiesa gan g? multipoigons nevis viens way. >> Viesturs >> >> 2011. gada 25. janv?ris 12:18 rakst?ja: >>> >>> Sveiki, >>> pagaidu robe?a nesen par?d?j?s kart?, mekl??an? pagaid?m izmai?u nav. >>> Cik saprotu kam?r t? nav piln?b? sagremojusies lab?k b?tu neaiztikt, kaut >>> gan var?tu m??in?t to blo??t vai izdz?st jau tagad? Pats jebkur? gad?jum? >>> vi?u neaiztik?u lai neb?tu v?l liel?ka ziepe... >>> Turpm?k apsolos ?adus eksperimentus neatk?rtot. >>> >>> ar cie?u, Toms. >>> >>> On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:28:06 +0200 >>> Rich wrote: >>> >>>> grmh, es taa sapr, ka jau uploadots... tagad jau par veelu, bet turpmaak >>>> "eksperimentus/testus" labaak neuploadot, jo nominatim searchu var sajaat. a >>>> tur shobriid migreejot uz jaunu sisteemu taapat daraamaa pietiek... >>>>> >>>>> On 01/25/11 01:38, tfr at apollo.lv wrote: Sveicin?ti, >>>>> >>>>> tikko uztais?ju aptuvenu pagaidu R?gas robe?as multipoligonu (m?r?is - >>>>> eksporta >>>>> test??ana)(http://img641.imageshack.us/i/rigatempmultipoligons.png/). Z?m?ts >>>>> JOSM? sv?trot? zon? neko neiel?d?jot (vai ir k?ds lab?ks veids?) - t? k? v?l >>>>> nezinu vai visp?r par?d?sies kart?. Biki? nohalt?r?ju iek?aujot Me??res un >>>>> Spilvi iek?? R?g?. >>>>> Ja k?dam tas trauc? bez ierunas izdz?s??u, bet b?tu labi lai poligons >>>>> past?v vismaz l?dz tre?dienai? >>>>> Pie??irtie tagi: admin_level=4 (lai redz?tu atsevi??i OSM Inspector - >>>>> boundaries) boundary=administrative name=R?ga place=city >>>>> >>>>> ar cie?u, Toms. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Rich >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-lv mailing list >>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-lv mailing list >> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >> > > > > -- > Cie??, > Raivis Dejus > Valdes loceklis > SIA World Technology Frontier > > Tel.: 26457260 > E-pasts: raivis at wtf.lv > www.wtf.lv > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > > From richlv at nakts.net Mon Jan 31 12:48:59 2011 From: richlv at nakts.net (Rich) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:48:59 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?utf-8?b?VXp6xKttxJNqdSBhcHR1dmVudSBSxKtnYXMgcm9iZcW+?= =?utf-8?q?as_pagaidu_multipoligonu?= In-Reply-To: References: <4D3E8996.9000804@nakts.net> Message-ID: <4D46AFBB.6090405@nakts.net> On 01/31/11 14:30, Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns wrote: > Esmu nedaudz pavirz?jies uz priek?u... bet uztaisot pilno > konvert?ciju, identific?ju v?l p?ris probl?mi?as, ko vajadz?tu > uzlabot... > > Te b?s pa?reiz?jais st?voklis, ko skripts sagatavo: > > http://nix.lv/test.osm.bz2 > > Pa?laik tur iek?? nav multipoligonu, bet vi?u ?ener??anu pielikt kl?t > ir 5 min??u darbs, trak?kais ir uzlabot algoritmu, lai visu smuki > sadala pa l?nij?m (pa?laik izskat?s, ka ir probl?mas ar novadu/valsts > pils?tu robe??m, jo n?k no da??diem shape failiem un ne visi punkti > sakr?t.. k? ar? izskat?s, ka ir pazudis vismaz viens novads :) ) > > Protams, ja k?ds grib pal?dz?t un ir python zin??anas, varu pie??r?t > skriptu... nepiecie?ams python un python-gdal a tas skripts nekam/nevienam citam nevar nodereet ? kaut kadaa osma svnaa gan jau arii var iestumt, varbuut nakotnee kaads priecaasies. anyway, listee iemest arii var, gan jau kaads paskatiisies (es nee, es nekodeeju ;) ) > Lauris > > 2011. gada 28. janv?ris 14:58 Raivis Dejus rakst?ja: >> Mani pieci centi ?ai sarunai: Dom?ju, ka vajadz?tu sagaid?t Laura skriptu un >> salikt visas robe?as vien?di. >> >> V?rt?gs lik?s jaut?jums par to k? m?s varam Laurim pal?dz?t, lai ?? lieta >> notiktu? >> Ja Lauris ir aiz?emts, varb?t vi?? var apst?st?t izdar?to un k?ds cits var >> pabeigt ?o? >> >> >> Ja ikdienas darb?b? nav starp?bas starp vienu ce?u un multipolygon - proti, >> visi softi saprot multipolygon, tad dom?ju, ka j?paliek tai robe?ai, kas >> tika uzz?m?ta pirm?. >> >> 2011/1/28 Viesturs Zarins >>> >>> Hmm, bet k? paliek ar pa?reiz?jo R?gas robe?u? Tur viena jau k?dus gadus >>> divus k? st?v http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/90625 >>> Tiesa gan g? multipoigons nevis viens way. >>> Viesturs >>> >>> 2011. gada 25. janv?ris 12:18 rakst?ja: >>>> >>>> Sveiki, >>>> pagaidu robe?a nesen par?d?j?s kart?, mekl??an? pagaid?m izmai?u nav. >>>> Cik saprotu kam?r t? nav piln?b? sagremojusies lab?k b?tu neaiztikt, kaut >>>> gan var?tu m??in?t to blo??t vai izdz?st jau tagad? Pats jebkur? gad?jum? >>>> vi?u neaiztik?u lai neb?tu v?l liel?ka ziepe... >>>> Turpm?k apsolos ?adus eksperimentus neatk?rtot. >>>> >>>> ar cie?u, Toms. >>>> >>>> On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:28:06 +0200 >>>> Rich wrote: >>>> >>>>> grmh, es taa sapr, ka jau uploadots... tagad jau par veelu, bet turpmaak >>>>> "eksperimentus/testus" labaak neuploadot, jo nominatim searchu var sajaat. a >>>>> tur shobriid migreejot uz jaunu sisteemu taapat daraamaa pietiek... >>>>>> >>>>>> On 01/25/11 01:38, tfr at apollo.lv wrote: Sveicin?ti, >>>>>> >>>>>> tikko uztais?ju aptuvenu pagaidu R?gas robe?as multipoligonu (m?r?is - >>>>>> eksporta >>>>>> test??ana)(http://img641.imageshack.us/i/rigatempmultipoligons.png/). Z?m?ts >>>>>> JOSM? sv?trot? zon? neko neiel?d?jot (vai ir k?ds lab?ks veids?) - t? k? v?l >>>>>> nezinu vai visp?r par?d?sies kart?. Biki? nohalt?r?ju iek?aujot Me??res un >>>>>> Spilvi iek?? R?g?. >>>>>> Ja k?dam tas trauc? bez ierunas izdz?s??u, bet b?tu labi lai poligons >>>>>> past?v vismaz l?dz tre?dienai? >>>>>> Pie??irtie tagi: admin_level=4 (lai redz?tu atsevi??i OSM Inspector - >>>>>> boundaries) boundary=administrative name=R?ga place=city >>>>>> >>>>>> ar cie?u, Toms. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Rich -- Rich From janis.rocans at gmail.com Mon Jan 31 21:29:15 2011 From: janis.rocans at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-13?B?SuJuaXMgUm/o4m5z?=) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:29:15 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?iso-8859-13?q?Uzz=EEm=E7ju_aptuvenu_R=EEgas_robe=FEas?= =?iso-8859-13?q?_pagaidu_multipoligonu?= In-Reply-To: References: <4D3E8996.9000804@nakts.net> Message-ID: Ja b?tu JAVA tais?jis, tad var?tu m??in?t piesl?gties, py man ir sve?s :( Lai gan var?tu m??in?t saprast valodu. Ats?ti man surci, pap?t??u, paslkat??os, ko varu dar?t l?etas lab?. 2011/1/31 Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns > Esmu nedaudz pavirz?jies uz priek?u... bet uztaisot pilno > konvert?ciju, identific?ju v?l p?ris probl?mi?as, ko vajadz?tu > uzlabot... > > Te b?s pa?reiz?jais st?voklis, ko skripts sagatavo: > > http://nix.lv/test.osm.bz2 > > Pa?laik tur iek?? nav multipoligonu, bet vi?u ?ener??anu pielikt kl?t > ir 5 min??u darbs, trak?kais ir uzlabot algoritmu, lai visu smuki > sadala pa l?nij?m (pa?laik izskat?s, ka ir probl?mas ar novadu/valsts > pils?tu robe??m, jo n?k no da??diem shape failiem un ne visi punkti > sakr?t.. k? ar? izskat?s, ka ir pazudis vismaz viens novads :) ) > > Protams, ja k?ds grib pal?dz?t un ir python zin??anas, varu pie??r?t > skriptu... nepiecie?ams python un python-gdal > > Lauris > > 2011. gada 28. janv?ris 14:58 Raivis Dejus rakst?ja: > > Mani pieci centi ?ai sarunai: Dom?ju, ka vajadz?tu sagaid?t Laura skriptu > un > > salikt visas robe?as vien?di. > > > > V?rt?gs lik?s jaut?jums par to k? m?s varam Laurim pal?dz?t, lai ?? lieta > > notiktu? > > Ja Lauris ir aiz?emts, varb?t vi?? var apst?st?t izdar?to un k?ds cits > var > > pabeigt ?o? > > > > > > Ja ikdienas darb?b? nav starp?bas starp vienu ce?u un multipolygon - > proti, > > visi softi saprot multipolygon, tad dom?ju, ka j?paliek tai robe?ai, kas > > tika uzz?m?ta pirm?. > > > > 2011/1/28 Viesturs Zarins > >> > >> Hmm, bet k? paliek ar pa?reiz?jo R?gas robe?u? Tur viena jau k?dus gadus > >> divus k? st?v http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/90625 > >> Tiesa gan g? multipoigons nevis viens way. > >> Viesturs > >> > >> 2011. gada 25. janv?ris 12:18 rakst?ja: > >>> > >>> Sveiki, > >>> pagaidu robe?a nesen par?d?j?s kart?, mekl??an? pagaid?m izmai?u nav. > >>> Cik saprotu kam?r t? nav piln?b? sagremojusies lab?k b?tu neaiztikt, > kaut > >>> gan var?tu m??in?t to blo??t vai izdz?st jau tagad? Pats jebkur? > gad?jum? > >>> vi?u neaiztik?u lai neb?tu v?l liel?ka ziepe... > >>> Turpm?k apsolos ?adus eksperimentus neatk?rtot. > >>> > >>> ar cie?u, Toms. > >>> > >>> On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:28:06 +0200 > >>> Rich wrote: > >>> > >>>> grmh, es taa sapr, ka jau uploadots... tagad jau par veelu, bet > turpmaak > >>>> "eksperimentus/testus" labaak neuploadot, jo nominatim searchu var > sajaat. a > >>>> tur shobriid migreejot uz jaunu sisteemu taapat daraamaa pietiek... > >>>>> > >>>>> On 01/25/11 01:38, tfr at apollo.lv wrote: Sveicin?ti, > >>>>> > >>>>> tikko uztais?ju aptuvenu pagaidu R?gas robe?as multipoligonu (m?r?is > - > >>>>> eksporta > >>>>> test??ana)(http://img641.imageshack.us/i/rigatempmultipoligons.png/). > Z?m?ts > >>>>> JOSM? sv?trot? zon? neko neiel?d?jot (vai ir k?ds lab?ks veids?) - t? > k? v?l > >>>>> nezinu vai visp?r par?d?sies kart?. Biki? nohalt?r?ju iek?aujot > Me??res un > >>>>> Spilvi iek?? R?g?. > >>>>> Ja k?dam tas trauc? bez ierunas izdz?s??u, bet b?tu labi lai poligons > >>>>> past?v vismaz l?dz tre?dienai? > >>>>> Pie??irtie tagi: admin_level=4 (lai redz?tu atsevi??i OSM Inspector - > >>>>> boundaries) boundary=administrative name=R?ga place=city > >>>>> > >>>>> ar cie?u, Toms. > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Rich > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Talk-lv mailing list > >>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Talk-lv mailing list > >> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Cie??, > > Raivis Dejus > > Valdes loceklis > > SIA World Technology Frontier > > > > Tel.: 26457260 > > E-pasts: raivis at wtf.lv > > www.wtf.lv > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Talk-lv mailing list > > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lv mailing list > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From janis.rocans at gmail.com Mon Jan 31 21:35:53 2011 From: janis.rocans at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-13?B?SuJuaXMgUm/o4m5z?=) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:35:53 +0200 Subject: [Talk-lv] =?iso-8859-13?q?Uzz=EEm=E7ju_aptuvenu_R=EEgas_robe=FEas?= =?iso-8859-13?q?_pagaidu_multipoligonu?= In-Reply-To: References: <4D3E8996.9000804@nakts.net> Message-ID: Nj?, skatos, ka C?su un blakus novadu robe?as gandr?z sakr?t, tom?r ir punkti, kas at??iras. Man ir 2 risin?jumi: 1) Labot skriptu; 2) Labot pa?reiz ?ener?tos datus ar JOSM. Kur? novads tr?kst un k?p?c? 2011/1/31 J?nis Ro??ns > Ja b?tu JAVA tais?jis, tad var?tu m??in?t piesl?gties, py man ir sve?s :( > Lai gan var?tu m??in?t saprast valodu. Ats?ti man surci, pap?t??u, > paslkat??os, ko varu dar?t l?etas lab?. > > 2011/1/31 Lauris Buk?is-Haberkorns > > Esmu nedaudz pavirz?jies uz priek?u... bet uztaisot pilno >> konvert?ciju, identific?ju v?l p?ris probl?mi?as, ko vajadz?tu >> uzlabot... >> >> Te b?s pa?reiz?jais st?voklis, ko skripts sagatavo: >> >> http://nix.lv/test.osm.bz2 >> >> Pa?laik tur iek?? nav multipoligonu, bet vi?u ?ener??anu pielikt kl?t >> ir 5 min??u darbs, trak?kais ir uzlabot algoritmu, lai visu smuki >> sadala pa l?nij?m (pa?laik izskat?s, ka ir probl?mas ar novadu/valsts >> pils?tu robe??m, jo n?k no da??diem shape failiem un ne visi punkti >> sakr?t.. k? ar? izskat?s, ka ir pazudis vismaz viens novads :) ) >> >> Protams, ja k?ds grib pal?dz?t un ir python zin??anas, varu pie??r?t >> skriptu... nepiecie?ams python un python-gdal >> >> Lauris >> >> 2011. gada 28. janv?ris 14:58 Raivis Dejus rakst?ja: >> > Mani pieci centi ?ai sarunai: Dom?ju, ka vajadz?tu sagaid?t Laura >> skriptu un >> > salikt visas robe?as vien?di. >> > >> > V?rt?gs lik?s jaut?jums par to k? m?s varam Laurim pal?dz?t, lai ?? >> lieta >> > notiktu? >> > Ja Lauris ir aiz?emts, varb?t vi?? var apst?st?t izdar?to un k?ds cits >> var >> > pabeigt ?o? >> > >> > >> > Ja ikdienas darb?b? nav starp?bas starp vienu ce?u un multipolygon - >> proti, >> > visi softi saprot multipolygon, tad dom?ju, ka j?paliek tai robe?ai, kas >> > tika uzz?m?ta pirm?. >> > >> > 2011/1/28 Viesturs Zarins >> >> >> >> Hmm, bet k? paliek ar pa?reiz?jo R?gas robe?u? Tur viena jau k?dus >> gadus >> >> divus k? st?v http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/90625 >> >> Tiesa gan g? multipoigons nevis viens way. >> >> Viesturs >> >> >> >> 2011. gada 25. janv?ris 12:18 rakst?ja: >> >>> >> >>> Sveiki, >> >>> pagaidu robe?a nesen par?d?j?s kart?, mekl??an? pagaid?m izmai?u nav. >> >>> Cik saprotu kam?r t? nav piln?b? sagremojusies lab?k b?tu neaiztikt, >> kaut >> >>> gan var?tu m??in?t to blo??t vai izdz?st jau tagad? Pats jebkur? >> gad?jum? >> >>> vi?u neaiztik?u lai neb?tu v?l liel?ka ziepe... >> >>> Turpm?k apsolos ?adus eksperimentus neatk?rtot. >> >>> >> >>> ar cie?u, Toms. >> >>> >> >>> On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:28:06 +0200 >> >>> Rich wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> grmh, es taa sapr, ka jau uploadots... tagad jau par veelu, bet >> turpmaak >> >>>> "eksperimentus/testus" labaak neuploadot, jo nominatim searchu var >> sajaat. a >> >>>> tur shobriid migreejot uz jaunu sisteemu taapat daraamaa pietiek... >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On 01/25/11 01:38, tfr at apollo.lv wrote: Sveicin?ti, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> tikko uztais?ju aptuvenu pagaidu R?gas robe?as multipoligonu (m?r?is >> - >> >>>>> eksporta >> >>>>> test??ana)(http://img641.imageshack.us/i/rigatempmultipoligons.png/). >> Z?m?ts >> >>>>> JOSM? sv?trot? zon? neko neiel?d?jot (vai ir k?ds lab?ks veids?) - >> t? k? v?l >> >>>>> nezinu vai visp?r par?d?sies kart?. Biki? nohalt?r?ju iek?aujot >> Me??res un >> >>>>> Spilvi iek?? R?g?. >> >>>>> Ja k?dam tas trauc? bez ierunas izdz?s??u, bet b?tu labi lai >> poligons >> >>>>> past?v vismaz l?dz tre?dienai? >> >>>>> Pie??irtie tagi: admin_level=4 (lai redz?tu atsevi??i OSM Inspector >> - >> >>>>> boundaries) boundary=administrative name=R?ga place=city >> >>>>> >> >>>>> ar cie?u, Toms. >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> Rich >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> Talk-lv mailing list >> >>> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >> >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Talk-lv mailing list >> >> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >> >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Cie??, >> > Raivis Dejus >> > Valdes loceklis >> > SIA World Technology Frontier >> > >> > Tel.: 26457260 >> > E-pasts: raivis at wtf.lv >> > www.wtf.lv >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Talk-lv mailing list >> > Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >> > >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-lv mailing list >> Talk-lv at openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: