[OSM-talk-nl] Betr: Re: ODbL acceptance statistics for the Netherlands

Frank Steggink steggink at steggink.org
Tue Dec 14 20:02:10 GMT 2010

On 10-12-14 08:51 PM, Frank Steggink wrote:
> On 10-12-14 08:43 PM, Erik Streb del Toro wrote:
>> And what is with the AND import? And with AND-fixbot? 3dshapes had a lot
>> of edits in Germany, too. So the Germans will also welcome “his” license
>> agreement.
>> Greetings,
>> Erik
> Why the haste (also @Henk), and why the focus on numbers? As far as I 
> know, we're still in the *voluntary* acceptance phase, so we're still 
> far from saying goodbye to non-ODbL data.

Oh, and since you seem to use the nick "Wicking" on the forum, let me 
start with a quote from you:

wicking wrote:

    Verlierer sind ein paar ganz kleine Länder. Unter anderem aber auch
    die Niederlande, dort wird auf der Mailingliste massiv gegen die
    ODbL-Zustimmung geworben – schätze das liegt daran. Vielleicht aber
    auch an den Importen, die nicht unter der ODbL stehen.

What do you think you're gaining by calling us "Verlierer"? If you're so 
interested in the situation in the Netherlands, you undoubtedly saw my 
post about the stats which are undone from the imports. And if you 
genuinely care about the situation here, I would recommend to change 
your tone. Pushing us *and* calling us losers behind our back (yeah, 
some of us can read German...) is NOT making acceptance for the ODbL / 
CT more widespread!


More information about the Talk-nl mailing list