[talk-ph] excellent work in subic and ormoc

[maning sambale]

Hi,

The respective mapper is sorting-out his/her edits around subic/olongapo area.

cheers,
maning

On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:34 PM, maning sambale
<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
> In the meantime, please give the respective contributors the benefit
> of the doubt ;)
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:28 PM, maning sambale
> <emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I will communicate this to the respective mappers.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:59 PM, D Tucny <d at tucny.com> wrote:
>>> 2009/1/12 D Tucny <d at tucny.com>
>>>>
>>>> 2009/1/12 maning sambale <emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Just found excellent updates in two areas:
>>>>>
>>>>> Subic/Olongapo:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=14.8266&lon=120.2912&zoom=14&layers=0B00FTF
>>>>>
>>>>> It looks like Olongapo is pretty much covered.  The editor is Deck
>>>>> Antonio.
>>>>> @ Deck are you on this list?  Great work!  May I know your data
>>>>> source?  AFAIK, there are no high-res sat in that area.
>>>>> Is this really entirely on gpx?
>>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Deck%20Antonio/traces/290144
>>>>> Wow!
>>>>
>>>> I'm very concerned about that to be honest... The GPX file isn't from a
>>>> GPS by the looks of it, it's created by an application called ExpertGPS,
>>>> and, contained within it are panaramio points and descriptions of paths and
>>>> polygons, which together suggest that potentially it was originally a google
>>>> earth exported kml that has been converted with ExpertGPS to a GPX file...
>>>> Google does have high res views of the area... If you download that GPX file
>>>> and open it in google earth, you'll see that the track almost exactly
>>>> followings the road layout and that buildings and areas are an exact match
>>>> to the google imagery... this is BAD...
>>>
>>> Much of the area was done by user 'Rally', notes made on nodes and ways
>>> as...
>>> contributor='Waypointsdotph; Rally de Leon'
>>> source='Rally de Leon pre-aligned GPS Trackmaker file'
>>>
>>> So, it appears that that data is largely imported from another source too,
>>> and there is detail in there that can't be attributed to that user's
>>> uploaded tracks or usable aerial imagery... In fact, certain features are
>>> reproduced in such detail, considering there positions, that it would be
>>> very unlikely that they could have been produced without aerial imagery,
>>> and, infact, seems to effectively match the available google imagery...
>>>
>>> I'm sorry to say, but, I think all this data will probably have to be
>>> removed unless a valid source can be documented...
>>>
>>> d
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> cheers,
>> maning
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
>> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>
>
>
>
> --
> cheers,
> maning
> ------------------------------------------------------
> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
> ------------------------------------------------------
>



-- 
cheers,
maning
------------------------------------------------------
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
------------------------------------------------------