[talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/ national parksboundaries

maning sambale emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com
Wed Jul 1 17:07:40 BST 2009


Last call for any comments on the planned national park/protected area
boundaries.  Anyone?

On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:48 PM, maning
sambale<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
> Fineprint:
> Source: PAWB-DENR, CI Philippines
> Restriction: No restriction of use
> Date: 12/08/00
> Citation: Data Source: Participants of the Philippine Biodiversity Conservation
> Priority-Setting Workshop, December 4 - 8, 2000
> Scale: 1:7,500,000
>
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Marloue Pidor<murlwe at mail2engineer.com> wrote:
>> Maning,
>>
>> Where did you get this data I just want to know the sections of the Mt. Apo
>> National Park. Based on RA 9237 Mt. Apo National Park have 3 section that
>> includes the north-west and south-east buffer zones. Based on the shape
>> file, it is already merged.
>>
>>
>> murlwe
>> <-----Original Message----->
>>>From: maning sambale [emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com]
>>>Sent: 6/14/2009 3:27:21 PM
>>>To: talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>>>Subject: Re: [talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/ national
>>> parksboundaries
>>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>Here is the protected area shapefile I intend to upload in OSM. I
>>>removed some PAs whom I think has "improper" polygon boundaries.
>>>
>>>Please review if you think this is suitable for OSM import.
>>>Download link:
>>> http://esambale.wikispaces.com/file/view/protected_areas_edited.zip
>>>
>>>
>>>On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:20 PM, maning
>>>sambale<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Is it Mount Kanlaon National Park included? If we include those
>>>national park it would be much interesting for those who who use OSM for
>>>biodiversity conservation.
>>>> Not sure, but I think it is. Right, in some areas there are no road
>>>> data simply because the are not much road in the first place. It
>>>> would be good for other data users (like conservationist) to be able
>>>> to use the data for their purpose. Some important features I dream of
>>>> adding:
>>>> 1. rivers
>>>> 2. landcover (different from landuse)
>>>> 3. coral reefs
>>>>
>>>> This can be mapped using landsat by the way.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> thanks.
>>>> > noel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:33 AM, maning
>>>> sambale<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Not good enough:
>>>>> http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3368/3595795759_20a6a76358_o.png
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems small protected areas were marked as large squares just to
>>>>> appear on the 1:7M scale map.
>>>>> Still other boundaries are good. Need to edit first, before import.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:36 AM, maning sambale
>>>>> <emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar
>>><seav80 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Should we add them? Why not?
>>>>>> OK, I will send a sample file for everyone to look at before adding
>>>them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm thinking of including additional tag, for example:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> name=Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park
>>>>>> boundary=national_park
>>>>>> NIPAS:category=natural park # this link for ref:
>>>>>> http://sunsite.nus.edu.sg/apcel/dbase/filipino/primary/phanip.html
>>>>>> source=PBCPP, 2002 # this is the actual source of publication
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is this OK, or any better tag for this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think these are the same shapefiles that Microsoft Encarta
>>>used in its
>>>>>>> Atlas component and the same ones imported into Google Maps/Map
>>>Maker. For
>>>>>>> instance look at the following Google Maps links:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Biak-na-Bato National Park:
>>>>>>>
>>>http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=15.11853,121.087189&spn=0.082363,0.175781&z=13
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We have way better boundary of Biak na Bato:
>>>>>>
>>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=15.1417&lon=121.099&zoom=13&layers=B000FTF
>>>>>> (I know because I stayed there for a few years)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 5:33 PM, maning sambale
>>><emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I found this in my gis database:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 123pas_ini_unproc.shp Unproclaimed protected areas as initial
>>>>>>>> components vis-a-vis integrated terrestrial and inland
>>>water priority
>>>>>>>> areas.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2pas_unproc_addl.shp Unproclaimed Protected areas as additional
>>>>>>>> components vis-a-vis integrated terrestrial and inland
>>>water priority
>>>>>>>> areas.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 36pa_iniunproc_ver.shp Unproclaimed protected areas
>>>>>>>> with boundaries for verification as initial components
>>>vis-a-vis
>>>>>>>> integrated terrestrial and inland water priority areas.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 83pas_proc.shp Proclaimed protected areas vis-a-vis integrated
>>>>>>>> terrestrial and inland water priority areas.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fineprint:
>>>>>>>> Source: PAWB-DENR, CI Philippines
>>>>>>>> Restriction: No restriction of use
>>>>>>>> Date: 12/08/00
>>>>>>>> Citation: Data Source: Participants of the Philippine
>>>Biodiversity
>>>>>>>> Conservation
>>>>>>>> Priority-Setting Workshop, December 4 - 8, 2000
>>>>>>>> Scale: 1:7,500,000
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Should we add them? FYI, we have 1 national park boundary
>>>added already:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=15.126&lon=121.124&zoom=11&layers=B000FTF
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> cheers,
>>>>>>>> maning
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>>>>>>>> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
>>>>>>>> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> talk-ph mailing list
>>>>>>>> talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>>>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> cheers,
>>>>>> maning
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>>>>>> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
>>>>>> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> cheers,
>>>>> maning
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>>>>> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
>>>>> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> cheers,
>>>> maning
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>>>> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
>>>> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>cheers,
>>>maning
>>>------------------------------------------------------
>>>"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>>>wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
>>>blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>>>------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>talk-ph mailing list
>>>talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>>>http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>>>t
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________
>> Get the Free email that has everyone talking at http://www.mail2world.com
>> Unlimited Email Storage – POP3 – Calendar – SMS – Translator – Much More!
>
>
>
> --
> cheers,
> maning
> ------------------------------------------------------
> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
> ------------------------------------------------------
>



-- 
cheers,
maning
------------------------------------------------------
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
------------------------------------------------------




More information about the talk-ph mailing list