[talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/ national parksboundaries

Sun Jun 14 10:48:44 BST 2009

Fineprint:
Source: PAWB-DENR, CI Philippines
Restriction: No restriction of use
Date: 12/08/00
Citation: Data Source: Participants of the Philippine Biodiversity Conservation
Priority-Setting Workshop, December 4 - 8, 2000
Scale: 1:7,500,000

On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Marloue Pidor<murlwe at mail2engineer.com> wrote:
> Maning,
>
> Where did you get this data I just want to know the sections of the Mt. Apo
> National Park. Based on RA 9237 Mt. Apo National Park have 3 section that
> includes the north-west and south-east buffer zones. Based on the shape
> file, it is already merged.
>
>
> murlwe
> <-----Original Message----->
>>From: maning sambale [emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com]
>>Sent: 6/14/2009 3:27:21 PM
>>To: talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>>Subject: Re: [talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/ national
>> parksboundaries
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Here is the protected area shapefile I intend to upload in OSM. I
>>removed some PAs whom I think has "improper" polygon boundaries.
>>
>>Please review if you think this is suitable for OSM import.
>>Download link:
>> http://esambale.wikispaces.com/file/view/protected_areas_edited.zip
>>
>>
>>On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:20 PM, maning
>>sambale<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Is it Mount Kanlaon National Park included? If we include those
>>national park it would be much interesting for those who who use OSM for
>>biodiversity conservation.
>>> Not sure, but I think it is. Right, in some areas there are no road
>>> data simply because the are not much road in the first place. It
>>> would be good for other data users (like conservationist) to be able
>>> to use the data for their purpose. Some important features I dream of
>>> adding:
>>> 1. rivers
>>> 2. landcover (different from landuse)
>>> 3. coral reefs
>>>
>>> This can be mapped using landsat by the way.
>>>
>>>
>>>> thanks.
>>> > noel
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:33 AM, maning
>>> sambale<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Not good enough:
>>>> http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3368/3595795759_20a6a76358_o.png
>>>>
>>>> It seems small protected areas were marked as large squares just to
>>>> appear on the 1:7M scale map.
>>>> Still other boundaries are good. Need to edit first, before import.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:36 AM, maning sambale
>>>> <emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar
>><seav80 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Should we add them? Why not?
>>>>> OK, I will send a sample file for everyone to look at before adding
>>them.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm thinking of including additional tag, for example:
>>>>>
>>>>> name=Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park
>>>>> boundary=national_park
>>>>> NIPAS:category=natural park # this link for ref:
>>>>> http://sunsite.nus.edu.sg/apcel/dbase/filipino/primary/phanip.html
>>>>> source=PBCPP, 2002 # this is the actual source of publication
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this OK, or any better tag for this?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I think these are the same shapefiles that Microsoft Encarta
>>used in its
>>>>>> Atlas component and the same ones imported into Google Maps/Map
>>Maker. For
>>>>>> instance look at the following Google Maps links:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Biak-na-Bato National Park:
>>>>>>
>>http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=15.11853,121.087189&spn=0.082363,0.175781&z=13
>>>>>
>>>>> We have way better boundary of Biak na Bato:
>>>>>
>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=15.1417&lon=121.099&zoom=13&layers=B000FTF
>>>>> (I know because I stayed there for a few years)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 5:33 PM, maning sambale
>><emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I found this in my gis database:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 123pas_ini_unproc.shp Unproclaimed protected areas as initial
>>>>>>> components vis-a-vis integrated terrestrial and inland
>>water priority
>>>>>>> areas.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2pas_unproc_addl.shp Unproclaimed Protected areas as additional
>>>>>>> components vis-a-vis integrated terrestrial and inland
>>water priority
>>>>>>> areas.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 36pa_iniunproc_ver.shp Unproclaimed protected areas
>>>>>>> with boundaries for verification as initial components
>>vis-a-vis
>>>>>>> integrated terrestrial and inland water priority areas.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 83pas_proc.shp Proclaimed protected areas vis-a-vis integrated
>>>>>>> terrestrial and inland water priority areas.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fineprint:
>>>>>>> Source: PAWB-DENR, CI Philippines
>>>>>>> Restriction: No restriction of use
>>>>>>> Date: 12/08/00
>>>>>>> Citation: Data Source: Participants of the Philippine
>>Biodiversity
>>>>>>> Conservation
>>>>>>> Priority-Setting Workshop, December 4 - 8, 2000
>>>>>>> Scale: 1:7,500,000
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Should we add them? FYI, we have 1 national park boundary
>>added already:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=15.126&lon=121.124&zoom=11&layers=B000FTF
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> cheers,
>>>>>>> maning
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>>>>>>> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
>>>>>>> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> talk-ph mailing list
>>>>>>> talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> cheers,
>>>>> maning
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>>>>> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
>>>>> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> cheers,
>>>> maning
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>>>> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
>>>> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> cheers,
>>> maning
>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>>> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
>>> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>cheers,
>>maning
>>------------------------------------------------------
>>"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>>wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
>>blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>>------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>talk-ph mailing list
>>talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>>http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>>t
>
> _______________________________________________________________
> Get the Free email that has everyone talking at http://www.mail2world.com
> Unlimited Email Storage – POP3 – Calendar – SMS – Translator – Much More!


-- 
cheers,
maning
------------------------------------------------------
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
------------------------------------------------------