[talk-ph] weird "wedding map" edit

[maning sambale]

The changeset is now reverted:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/5047946

Can anyone please this way:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/10590362

It's the only conflict in reversion process, otherwise everything is clean. :)

IRC chat logs with balrog (who made the revertion)
<maning> request for changeset revertion
<maning> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2010-June/051141.html
<maning> hope the revert operators catch the message
<balrog-k1n> maning: the ways have not been removed?
<balrog-k1n> i think i can try reverting, let's see
<maning> yes the ways haven't been removed just tags and pois are removed.
<maning> thanks!
<balrog-k1n> np
<balrog-k1n> i hope there are no conflicts and if there are then that
there will be someone to take care of what couldn't be undeleted
because of them
<maning> looking at the recent edits, no one is editing the area so far
<balrog-k1n> oh good
<maning> @ balrog, thanks, we owe you [insert your preffered bevarage]
<balrog-k1n> maning: no problem, it's mostly automatic, but let's see
if it works first :)
<balrog-k1n> my scripts always break in some way
<maning> OK I'll wait then.  After your revertion, we can do some of
the clean-up by hand.
<balrog-k1n> yay, seems to have succeeded with just one conflicting
way (in #5047942)
<balrog-k1n> sorry, in #5047946
<balrog-k1n> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/10590362 is the
conflicting way
<balrog-k1n> i left it intact and reverted the rest
<balrog-k1n> um no, i haven't
<balrog-k1n> ah i know what happened,
<balrog-k1n> the user had edited that way twice in this changeset
<balrog-k1n> so i edited it and then had a conflict when trying to
revert the second edit :P
<balrog-k1n> anyway that's the only thing to check
<maning> OK thanks for the help.
<balrog-k1n> np
<maning> I'll ask local mappers to check on that way.

On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 9:54 AM, maning sambale
<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
> revertion commencing ...
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar <seav80 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Revert the whole thing even if the user has not replied yet. The user
>> deleted all the oneway=yes tags he can find.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:42 AM, maning sambale <emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I find this edit weird:
>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/5042575
>>>
>>> 353 POIs removed!  I already asked the editor for clarification, just
>>> in case it is a mistake, I will request a revertion.
>>>
>>> --
>>> cheers,
>>> maning
>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>>> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
>>> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> talk-ph mailing list
>>> talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> cheers,
> maning
> ------------------------------------------------------
> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
> ------------------------------------------------------
>



-- 
cheers,
maning
------------------------------------------------------
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
------------------------------------------------------