[talk-ph] multiple multipolygons for Pampanga River

[Pierre Béland]

Hi  Ronny, 

The tagging list would be the best place to have information about the best tag to use. Not everyone agrees to follow such votes for tagging where only a few people participated.


 
Pierre 



________________________________
 De : Ronny Ager-Wick <ronny at ager-wick.com>
À : Pierre Béland <pierzenh at yahoo.fr>; osm-ph <talk-ph at openstreetmap.org> 
Envoyé le : Mercredi 19 février 2014 8h26
Objet : Re: [talk-ph] multiple multipolygons for Pampanga River
 


Thanks for the clarification, Pierre.
Actually, I tagged the relation both with natural=water,
      water=river and waterway=riverbank as advised in the wiki (see New
      Tagging) I assume this is the recommended way to do it?

As for Obrero, I haven't been that far north yet :) I only traced
      it up to the point where someone else had traced it. I stopped
      around Sta Rosa: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/15.4214/120.9354
But, yes I agree, that needs to be retraced. It was probably
      traced from an old lower resolution satellite image like some of
      my own earlier work.

Ronny.


On 2014-02-19 21:01, Pierre Béland wrote:

Ronny,
>
>It is not necessary fo merge the two relations, Each of these
        riverbank polygons must be a closed polygon.
>See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Driverbank
>
>
>For the relation 2411084, you must replaced the Tag
          natural=water to waterway=riverbank.
>
>
>North of Obrero the riverbank must be retraced and the island must be traced independently from the riverbank. The island will be included in the relation with the role=inner.  The island is in fact smaller and a smaller river on the right connect to the main river.
>
see http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/15.544/121.0012 
>
>
>
>Pierre 
>
>
>
>________________________________
> De : Ronny Ager-Wick <ronny at ager-wick.com>
>À : osm-ph <talk-ph at openstreetmap.org> 
>Envoyé le : Mercredi 19 février 2014 1h53
>Objet : [talk-ph] multiple multipolygons for Pampanga River
> 
>
>I've been adding polygons for Pampanga River and some of
              its contributories, 
>starting near Mt Arayat and working myself northward,
              joining up with the 
>existing multipolygon - http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2411084. I then 
>worked myself southwards until I found another
              multipolygon for Pampanga River 
>- http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2913607 .
>Is there a way to merge these?
>Or doesn't it matter that the river is split into several
              multipolygons as 
>long as they are joined by shared nodes?
>
>Ronny.
>
>_______________________________________________
>talk-ph mailing list
>talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/attachments/20140219/8dda057e/attachment-0001.html>