[talk-ph] Guagua mapping progress and tagging evacuation centers
pierzenh at yahoo.fr
Wed Jun 4 14:28:36 UTC 2014
Effectively, we dont tag for the renderer and have to thinkabout the audiences (public and humanitarian organizations) and which tool / layer to give rapid access to this information in crisis context. Wireless solutions could be interesting. Then, is it possible to integrate this in existing OSM products such as OSMAnd, OSMTracker, etc ?
Manning proposition about the various aspects provides significant information. I think that this is a good basis to start thinking about this.
About the humanitarian Style, I am not sure that this is the place. There are many POI's and trying to add an evacuation center over this would add confusion. Also, I dont think that this would be the best option to locate rapidly the evacuation centers.
If a Tsunami arize, we need this information to be available at this crucial moment. Thematic maps could be useful for both the public and the humanitarian organizations. But in case of emergencies, a wireless application that show you the way to the nearest evacuation center would be the best I think.
It would be interesting to discuss all of this on the HOT IRC or a specific one for Philippines. We had such discussions for the Mali Activation in 2013. OCHA and the clusters participated to weekly discussions about various subjects like this. This is a good way to progress and motivate OSM contributors and humanitarian about working together.
De : Mark Cupitt <markcupitt at gmail.com>
À : maning sambale <emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com>
Cc : osm-ph <talk-ph at openstreetmap.org>; aldwin_mallari2000 <aldwin_mallari2000 at yahoo.com>
Envoyé le : Mercredi 4 juin 2014 8h20
Objet : Re: [talk-ph] Guagua mapping progress and tagging evacuation centers
Hi Maning, I guess the determining factor is who will be using the data. If it is responders in an emergency, all they really need is the location they can plug into a gps and maybe a people capacity so they know what they are dealing with
If it is end users (public), the more detailed aspect becomes debatable. You do not want people going to the wrong evacuation center for the wrong emergency. That would be disastrous.
I think the tagging is great, but maybe should only be rendered on maps specific to disaster relief efforts. As it is, it is unlikely to be rendered on the new OSM Carto, so including the information will do no harm, but could make it available to organizations who need it.
Manin, I think your points
* type of disaster
* structural integrity
* number of evacuees it can accommodate
* length of time of the evacuees to stay depending on the resources available
are crucial to responders and would be incredibly useful for responders in a disaster in the future.
Pierre, could this be proposed and rendered under the HOT Carto scheme?
"If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence"
See me on Open StreetMap
See me on LinkedIn
See me on StackExchange
The contents of this email are intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain
confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not disclose, copy, distribute,
or use the contents of this email. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete the email and any attachments.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 7:45 PM, maning sambale <emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I guess the question is, are there different types of evacuation centers?? I am not sure. If a school is in a low zone is it appropriate for a Tsunami?? I guess GuaGua will not have any Tsunami Evacuation Centers, but will have earthquake, volcano, lahar flows, etc.
>> Should they be tagged for the type of disaster they are intended for, or are they generic
>Good point. As what we always discuss to our DRR partners, not all
>evacuation centers are the same.
>For DRR managers, they need to be aware of the "quality and capacity
>of evacuation centers" categorized according to:
>* type of disaster
>* structural integrity
>* number of evacuees it can accommodate
>* length of time of the evacuees to stay depending on the resources available
>But for now, I am not sure if this should be included in OSM.
>> Lastly, would it be appropriate to include contact details for the different services?? Hard to maintain unless the relief agencies do it them selves ..
>Unless it is an official contact number like Davao's 911 or Pasig's
>DRR Command Center, I don't think it should be in OSM.
>This is more appropriate for the LGU's DRRM Office to maintain as an
>"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the talk-ph