[talk-ph] Tagging on OSMPH
markcupitt at gmail.com
Sun May 25 06:19:57 UTC 2014
Ok, I will check for both instances then,
Actually, the colon ':" in the tag name can confuse a database in some
circumstances, if anyone is messing with this themselves, you have to
denote the column header as "place:ph" with double quotes
"If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence"
See me on Open StreetMap <https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mark_Cupitt>
See me on LinkedIn <http://ph.linkedin.com/in/markcupitt>
*See me on StackExchange <http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/17846/mark-c>*
The contents of this email are intended only for the individual(s) to whom
it is addressed and may contain
confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient, you must not disclose, copy, distribute,
or use the contents of this email. If you have received this email in
error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete the email and any attachments.
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar <seav80 at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar <seav80 at gmail.com>wrote:
>> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Mark Cupitt <markcupitt at gmail.com>wrote:
>>> I also have a question about places:ph, there are a LOT in the database,
>>> I guess they are implemented with other tags, is there a definitive list of
>>> what the other tags are?
>>> Seem like Barangays mostly, but possibly some other places?
>> Taginfo to the rescue!
>> Based on Taginfo, 95% of the values of the place:ph=* tag is "barangay"
>> with a total of number of 1,300. This is actually quite low. There are
>> almost 42,000 barangays in the Philippines.
>> The other values are purok and sitio (which are unofficial subunits of a
>> barangay) and a few other values that I think are wrong uses of the tag.
> To answer the other question, I think the intention of the place:ph=* tag
> is to definitely indicate that a node tagged as place=village refers
> specifically to an official barangay instead of some other "village" such
> as residential subdivisions and gated communities (which should really be
> tagged with place=neighbourhood)
> Personally, I would like to use the international designation=* tag to
> indicate that a place is an official barangay instead of using a
> Philippine-specific tag like place:ph=*.
> Thus, my personal preference is place=village, designation=barangay
> instead of place=village, place:ph=barangay.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the talk-ph