[talk-ph] Any value in keeping imagery boundaries in OSM?

Eugene Alvin Villar seav80 at gmail.com
Thu Jan 7 11:57:03 UTC 2016


If I remember correctly, the boundaries were re-added for the benefit of
students mapping from the George Washington University. I can't find it now
but there was a note (tag?) requesting that the boundaries not be deleted.

I prefer that these be deleted as these are not data that properly belongs
in the main OSM database.

On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 4:55 PM, maning sambale <emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Discuss here or in the ticket:
> https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/6
> --
> cheers,
> maning
> ------------------------------------------------------
> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
> https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
> http://twitter.com/maningsambale
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/attachments/20160107/46975a45/attachment.html>


More information about the talk-ph mailing list