[talk-ph] Quezon City mapping: districts

Eugene Alvin Villar seav80 at gmail.com
Tue May 31 23:01:47 UTC 2016


You should have taken a picture of that map! :)

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Erwin Olario <govvin at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> It could be based on barangay membership to a district, I remeber
> encountering some map from city hall about that a few years back.
>
> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 3:48 PM Eugene Alvin Villar <seav80 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I don't know if QC's districts have ever been defined. As far as I can
>> tell, they are general areas and there is no hard line delineating these
>> districts.
>>
>> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Jherome Miguel <jheromemiguel at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Quezon City's political map on OpenStreetMap is mostly complete, with
>>> every barangay mapped, but the district boundaries are still missing,
>>> although district nodes are already added. I started to add nodes for those
>>> districts, like Novaliches, New Manila, Santa Mesa Heights, Diliman, and
>>> Balintawak, but district boundaries are still undefined. Can someone map
>>> Quezon City's district boundaries, while I'll add the others, like the
>>> Project areas La Loma, and Bago Bantay (possibly the same as the "Munoz"
>>> area)?
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> talk-ph mailing list
>>> talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk-ph mailing list
>> talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>>
> --
>
> -- Dispatched by mental telepathy via Ansible
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/attachments/20160601/560c0e05/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the talk-ph mailing list