[talk-ph] is_in tags in the Philippines

[Eugene Alvin Villar]

I generally agree except for the cases where the tag value corresponds to
an administrative entity that already has a boundary relation. In which
case I would then remove the tag.

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020, 10:16 AM Erwin Olario, <govvin at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Until we have a complete, and accurate sub-national boundary polygons in
> the Philippines, I'd like to suggest that we avoid removing is_in tags, as
> these may still contain valuable information that cannot be deduced from
> still non-existent boundaries.
>
> What do you think?
>
> /erwin
>
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> » email: erwin@ <erwin at ngnuity.net>*n**gnu**it**y**.xyz*
> <http://ngnuity.net/> | govvin at gmail.com
> » mobile: https://t.me/GOwin
> » OpenPGP key: 3A93D56B | 5D42 7CCB 8827 9046 1ACB 0B94 63A4 81CE 3A93
> D56B
> _______________________________________________
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/attachments/20200123/907d6b79/attachment.htm>