[talk-pr] Is there a negative consequence of removing POI nodes when a building polygon has been tagged with all relevant information

[Victor Ramirez]

Just for reference, in Amazon S3, 200 GB of storage would cost around
$20 a month. How much data are we talking about?

On 01/16/2014 05:33 PM, JOSE L CUEVAS wrote:
> I can try to setup a test-bed infrastructure at the university.  Was thinking of MapServer with titlecache.  I have no experience with none of them but will try to get something started. Any idea of how much space we will need for the WMS data?
>
> On Jan 16, 2014, at 1:00 PM, Jeff Haack <jeff.haack en gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Search will work the same with points and polygons.  I believe it is incorrect to have a point with identical information to a polygon, better to use a polygon if you can draw it.  It seems common though to draw a building and then put POIs as points within it when there are numerous shops in the same building.
>>
>> Re: Marshall's, I don't think there is a common accepted standard on this.  What I typically do is map the whole building as something if the vast majority of it is taken up by one place, as is the case with Marshall's.  But arguably it could be done with a POI too.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Victor Ramirez <vramirez122000 en yahoo.com> wrote:
>> For example, would it affect the OSM search database?
>>
>> If a shop happens to be in a building, should the building name be the name of the most prominent shop (e.g. mashalls old san juan)?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk-pr mailing list
>> talk-pr en openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pr
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk-pr mailing list
>> talk-pr en openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pr
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk-pr mailing list
> talk-pr en openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pr