[talk-pr] Is there a negative consequence of removing POI nodes when a building polygon has been tagged with all relevant information
Jeff Haack
jeff.haack at gmail.com
Fri Jan 17 04:33:35 UTC 2014
Jose, if we host with Tilecache, I think we would need the size of the
geotiffs (~50GB according to other thread) + maybe 10-20 GB more for the
tiles. The more the better I suppose, but I'm pretty sure Tilecache will
expire and remove tiles as space is needed, or at worst you could set up a
cron job to do it.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Jeff Haack <jeff.haack at gmail.com> wrote:
> If all the tiles are prerendered I would expect a minimum of 2TB of data.
> You can try it out with the GDAL library - you'll want gdal2tiles.py I
> believe. I rendered the country of Georgia once, black and white imagery
> covering roughly 50,000 sq. km to zoom 18, and that was around 1.7TB in
> tiles. Not sure but thinking Tilecache would be better option.
>
>
> On Thursday, January 16, 2014, Victor Ramirez <vramirez122000 at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Just for reference, in Amazon S3, 200 GB of storage would cost around
>> $20 a month. How much data are we talking about?
>>
>> On 01/16/2014 05:33 PM, JOSE L CUEVAS wrote:
>> > I can try to setup a test-bed infrastructure at the university. Was
>> thinking of MapServer with titlecache. I have no experience with none of
>> them but will try to get something started. Any idea of how much space we
>> will need for the WMS data?
>> >
>> > On Jan 16, 2014, at 1:00 PM, Jeff Haack <jeff.haack at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Search will work the same with points and polygons. I believe it is
>> incorrect to have a point with identical information to a polygon, better
>> to use a polygon if you can draw it. It seems common though to draw a
>> building and then put POIs as points within it when there are numerous
>> shops in the same building.
>> >>
>> >> Re: Marshall's, I don't think there is a common accepted standard on
>> this. What I typically do is map the whole building as something if the
>> vast majority of it is taken up by one place, as is the case with
>> Marshall's. But arguably it could be done with a POI too.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Victor Ramirez <
>> vramirez122000 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> For example, would it affect the OSM search database?
>> >>
>> >> If a shop happens to be in a building, should the building name be the
>> name of the most prominent shop (e.g. mashalls old san juan)?
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> talk-pr mailing list
>> >> talk-pr at openstreetmap.org
>> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pr
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> talk-pr mailing list
>> >> talk-pr at openstreetmap.org
>> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pr
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > talk-pr mailing list
>> > talk-pr at openstreetmap.org
>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pr
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk-pr mailing list
>> talk-pr at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pr
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-pr/attachments/20140117/b87adaf7/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the talk-pr
mailing list