[Talk-ro] Import CLC
Stefan UNGUREANU
stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro
Tue Dec 7 06:44:03 GMT 2010
Din pacate datele importate nu sunt intotdeauna corecte. De ex, undeva
langa Campina, am gasit o mare zona rezidentiala care apare in CLC ca
lac. Nu am avut inca timp sa vad daca problema e la conversiile de la
CLC la OSM, dar e oricum bizar.
Daca mai observati zone cu elemente bizare, sa-mi trimiteti un link ca
sa vad ce nu a mers bine la import.
Sper ca astazi sa termin si apele si sa incep pagina de wiki pentru
discutii.
Stefan.
On 07/12/2010 08:26, Ioan Indreias wrote:
> Excelent - sper ca toti care se gandesc la stergeri sa procedeze la
> fel. Ideea este sa pastram informatiile utile de la ce se considera a
> nu mai fi un poligon de actualitate.
>
> In alta ordine de idei multumim lui Stefan pentru efortul depus.
>
> Toate bune,
> Nini.
>
> 2010/12/6 Constantin Popescu<popescu.constantin at gmail.com>:
>> Acum sper sa fie ok. Am adaugat tag-urile de la poligonul vechi.
>>
>> 2010/12/6 Constantin Popescu<popescu.constantin at gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Salut Cristi. Inca nu am pus tag-urile noi dar am sa le adaug.
>>>
>>> 2010/12/6 Cristian Draghici<cristian.draghici at gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Discutia a fost ca CLC nu defineste limite administrative si ca
>>>> poligonele cultura.ro raman si sunt redenumite (cu pre-CLC).
>>>> Acum Deva nu mai are limita administrativa.
>>>> Ati sters poligonul vechi dar proprietatile "boundary" = "administrative"
>>>> , "siruta:code" = 86696, "place=city" nu le-ati transferat pe poligonul nou.
>>>> Poligonul nou nu are nici un atribut care sa-l lege de orasul Deva - e
>>>> doar o zona colorata gri.
>>>> "siruta:code" facea legatura intre un poligon administrativ si orasul sau
>>>> (pentru ca siruta:code apare si pe punctul care reprezinta centrul orasului
>>>> - place=town).
>>>>
>>>> Cu multumiri,
>>>> --
>>>> Cristi
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2010/12/6 Constantin Popescu<popescu.constantin at gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, asa mi se pare si mie cel mai corect. Mersi
>>>>>
>>>>> 2010/12/6 Stefan UNGUREANU<stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Atunci cred ca ar trebui puse tag-urile de boundary pe celalalt
>>>>>> poligon, si sters cel necorespunzator.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Din cate vad eu, vechiul poligon de landuse nu are puncte comune cu
>>>>>> altele, deci ar merge pur si simplu sters.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Stefan.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 06/12/2010 16:45, Constantin Popescu wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am observat si eu asta. Am vazut ca ai si corectat. Insa intrebarea
>>>>>>> mea
>>>>>>> ramane: care e utilitatea acestui poligon atata vreme cat limitele lui
>>>>>>> nu sunt corecte si mai mult, exista deja o delimitare mult mai corecta
>>>>>>> prin aceste poligoane care au fost importate de catre tine.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2010/12/6 Stefan UNGUREANU<stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro
>>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Din cate am vazut, vechiul poligon de landuse
>>>>>>> (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/53197617) nu mai avea
>>>>>>> tag-urile de boundary, pe care le-am pus eu acum.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Stefan.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 06/12/2010 16:32, Constantin Popescu wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Intrebarea mea e atunci, e vreo problema daca o sterg ? In
>>>>>>> cazul
>>>>>>> orasului Deva, limitele acestui poligon oricum nu sunt corecte.
>>>>>>> Stiu ca
>>>>>>> inainte de acest import masiv orice sursa de date era buna, fie
>>>>>>> ea si
>>>>>>> invizibila. Dar acum cu atatea poligoane, mai sunt acestea
>>>>>>> necesare ? Nu
>>>>>>> stiu in alte orase, dar stiu ca in cazul meu, stergerea
>>>>>>> acestuia
>>>>>>> m-ar
>>>>>>> ajuta enorm.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2010/12/6 Stefan UNGUREANU<stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro
>>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro>
>>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro
>>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Da, stiu. Inainte de import, eu am incercat sa le modific
>>>>>>> pe
>>>>>>> toate
>>>>>>> in asa fel incat sa respecte pattern-ul descris in mailul
>>>>>>> naterior
>>>>>>> dar, fie mi-au scapat, fie au fost re-modificate dupa.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Stefan.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 06/12/2010 16:24, Constantin Popescu wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Si totusi in unele cazuri au :) Am atasat o poza cu
>>>>>>> unul din
>>>>>>> cazuri. Nu
>>>>>>> as vrea sa sterg ceva ceva ce e folositor, dar deja
>>>>>>> sunt
>>>>>>> foarte
>>>>>>> multe
>>>>>>> pologoane.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In cazul JOSM, ai dreptate, se pare ca JOSM nu sterge
>>>>>>> latura comuna.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2010/12/6 Stefan UNGUREANU<stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro
>>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro>
>>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro
>>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro>>
>>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro
>>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro>
>>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro
>>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Salut,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Din discutiile mai vechi, o idee era ca poligoanele
>>>>>>> importate de la
>>>>>>> "cultura.ro<http://cultura.ro> <http://cultura.ro>
>>>>>>> <http://cultura.ro>" (sursa
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mircea Angelescu), sa nu
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> aiba landuse=residential, ci doar
>>>>>>> boundary=administrative, si
>>>>>>> celelalte tag-uri conexe.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nici eu nu m-am prins cum sa sterg un way fara sa
>>>>>>> sterg si
>>>>>>> punctele
>>>>>>> componente. Am remarcat insa ca JOSM nu va sterge
>>>>>>> punctele
>>>>>>> care sunt
>>>>>>> folosite si in alte poligoane, dar nu sunt 100%
>>>>>>> sigur ca
>>>>>>> asta e regula.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Stefan.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 06/12/2010 14:50, Constantin Popescu wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Salut,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Vin si eu cu cateva intrebari si nelamuriri. In
>>>>>>> urma acestui
>>>>>>> import in
>>>>>>> orasul meu exista acum doua poligoane cu
>>>>>>> landuse=residential.
>>>>>>> Primul din
>>>>>>> ele, cu sursa "Mircea Anglescu" cred ca e
>>>>>>> inutil
>>>>>>> in acest
>>>>>>> moment. Cum
>>>>>>> pot sterge acel poligon fara sa sterg si un alt
>>>>>>> eventual
>>>>>>> poligon
>>>>>>> care
>>>>>>> are o latura comuna cu acesta ? Folosesc JOSM
>>>>>>> si nu
>>>>>>> mi-am dat
>>>>>>> seama cum
>>>>>>> pot face asta. Vreau sa il sterg pentru ca
>>>>>>> poligonul de
>>>>>>> CORINE e
>>>>>>> mult
>>>>>>> mai precis, si acolo unde nu e corect, poate fi
>>>>>>> corectat mai
>>>>>>> usor decat
>>>>>>> cel vechi.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Multumesc.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>>>>> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>
>>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>>
>>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>
>>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>>>>> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>
>>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>>
>>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>
>>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>>>>> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>
>>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>>
>>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>>>>> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>
>>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>>
>>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>>>>> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>
>>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>>>>> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>
>>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>>>>> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>>>> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>>> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-ro mailing list
>> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ro mailing list
> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
More information about the Talk-ro
mailing list