[Talk-se] ODBL in Sweden

[Susanna Björverud]

When you say will be removed what does that really imply. F ex way
24744222 which I originally added (and I have accepted the new terms)
have subsequently been refined by two other users, whom I guess not both
have accepted the terms (yet?). This road shows up in red on the map you
linked to. So what does removing it mean? That it will be totally gone,
or that it will be reverted to my original contribution? Or will my work
(baby) be thrown out with the bathwater because someone else has been
further modifying my data?

-Sanna

tor 2010-11-11 klockan 07:26 +0100 skrev Hanno Hecker:

> On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 06:49:02 +0100
> Andreas Vilén <andreas.vilen at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Yes, I have read through something like that before. That doesn't
> > answer what happens with the entire city of Gothenburg... For example,
> > much of it is mapped by a user who has not edited since October
> > 2009... The probability that this user will see and accept the new
> > terms is very low. We can, however, suspect that s/he would have
> As far as I understand that, all old users (i.e. those registered
> before March 2010) will get a mail to accept the new licence.
> 
> > nothing against them. My problem with the licence change is how things
> > like this are to be solved.
> yes... 
> 
> Maybe we should identify those who have not accepted the new terms and
> ask them to do this now. 
> 
> > 2010/11/11 Hanno Hecker <vetinari+osm at ankh-morp.org>:
> > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Implementation_Plan
> > > and/or
> > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Backup_Plan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-se mailing list
> Talk-se at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-se


-------------- next part --------------
En HTML-bilaga skiljdes ut...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-se/attachments/20101111/786a3dc0/attachment.html>