[Talk-se] Göra klart Europa-, riks & länsvägar?

[Erik Lundin]

Hi,

I'm not completely sure if you mean that the mentioned roundabout 
mapping is wrong, but as I was the one who did the last edit, I can 
explain how I think regarding roundabouts and relations:
* I use to split up roundabouts if not the complete roundabout belongs 
to the relation.
* If the way is oneway (or roundabout, which implies oneway), I do not 
add forward or backward as roles.

/Erik

2010-08-29 14:02, Hanno Hecker skrev:
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 19:30:50 +0200
> Peter Kindström<peter2010 at infolagret.se>  wrote:
>> Här tror jag t.ex. min statussida (kommentarerna) plus kanske en
>> markering på OpenStreetBugs eller en FIXME vore realistiskt idag. För
>> "kreti&  pleti" kanske min sida kan vara tillräckligt enkel?
>> (En baktanke jag har är att skriva en artikel i Caravanbladet och be en
>> stor del av Sveriges campare om hjälp - de vill ha enkelhet i så fall.)
>>
>> Vad tycker ni?
> I've hacked gary68's relation check ([1], [2]) a bit. It does not
> report an error if a junction=roundabout is in the route... note: this
> just includes support for closed roundabouts: For example the
> roundabout north of node 310316 is divided into four parts, none of the
> links has a forward/backward role for Riksväg 55 (two problems at
> once :-)).
>
> The result can be seen here:
> http://ankh-morp.org/osm/sv-routes.htm (output restricted to
> route=road, because route=* would be 4MB :-))
>
> 	Hanno
>
> [1]:
> http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/utils/gary68/checkrelation.pl
> [2]: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation_Check
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-se mailing list
> Talk-se at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-se