[Talk-transit] NaPTAN Merging Guidelines
roger at slevin.plus.com
Tue Aug 18 08:23:45 BST 2009
NaPTAN does not allow the character "/" to be part of a commonname as NaPTAN
rules (not fully adhered to by TfL or LBSL) do not "allow" composite
Underground station entrances are included in NaPTAN data ... they are part
of the 490 area data (whereas the stations themselves are in a national
dataset prefixed 940)
From: talk-transit-bounces at openstreetmap.org
[mailto:talk-transit-bounces at openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Bryce McKinlay
Sent: 18 August 2009 01:08
To: Public transport/transit/shared taxi related topics
Subject: Re: [Talk-transit] NaPTAN Merging Guidelines
Thank you very much for your efforts on this, Thomas, and everyone
else involved - I've been waiting for the London import for a while,
and it's fantastic to see this data in OSM!
I have one "bug" to report: Is it possible that special characters are
being dropped from the stop names during the import? For example:
<node id="469789137" lat="51.5122005" lon="-0.1420652" version="1"
changeset="2177128" user="NaPTAN" uid="104459" visible="true"
<tag k="name" v="Conduit Street Saville Row"/>
<tag k="naptan:CommonName" v="Conduit Street Saville Row"/>
TfL refers to this as "Conduit Street / Saville Row", so it seems the
"/" characters are going missing somewhere?
Also, I'm curious whether, in addition to the bus stop data, NaPTAN
contains precise locations for Underground station exits, and if so,
whether there is any plan to import these? OSM often contains only one
node for stations that have multiple exits, and in some cases the node
is ambiguously placed such that it isn't clear which street (or which
side of the street) an exit is on. This level of precision does become
significant when producing walking maps/directions...
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Thomas Wood<grand.edgemaster at gmail.com>
> I've only just realised that my previous message regarding the imports
> beginning only went to talk-gb and talk-gb-london.
> Greater London is now imported as changeset 2177128.
> I was planning to import Hull and Suffolk also this week.
> Now that we're importing the data, we really need to get our
> guidelines on how to merge and tidy the data sorted. I've pulled out
> the relevant pieces from the Birmingham wikipage out to
> It really needs to be tidied and beaten into a useful document before
> we let more people loose with the data.
> Thomas Wood
> Talk-transit mailing list
> Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org
Talk-transit mailing list
Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org
More information about the Talk-transit