[Talk-transit] Naptan import

Chris Hill chillly809 at yahoo.co.uk
Mon Jul 27 22:42:48 BST 2009


Christoph Böhme wrote:
> Hi
>
> "Roger Slevin" <roger at slevin.plus.com> schrieb:
>
>   
>> Locality Classification was added as a possible "nice to have" to the
>> version 2 schema but it has not been populated, and no guidance has
>> been created to indicate how this field should be used (save for a
>> table of permitted values).  There is no classification data in NPTG
>> other than that which comes from the source - and that is only there
>> because it could be ... I would not recommend its use as it is flaky,
>> and offers nothing in respect of newly created locality entries in
>> the Gazetteer.
>>     
>
> So, it looks like we will not have any classification information.
> Unless we just want to import the plain names this will complicate the
> import a bit as we have to somehow map the locations to OSM place-types.
> At the moment I am having three ideas how we could do this:
>
> Based on the parent relationship we could guess if a location might
> be a suburb or village.
>
> Many places have wikipedia entries (even villages). If we can manage
> to automatically look the entries up and extract the relevant
> information (population size) from the info box we could probably
> classify a lot of places.
>
> The landsat data might give us some hints about the size of places. We
> just need to find a way to retrieve this information automatically :-)
>
> Alternatively we could just invent a value for unclassified places and
> wait for people to classify the places.
>
> Do you have any other ideas?
>
>   
Ask for local experts.  I have maintained a list of places in East 
Yorkshire in the wiki.  There are about 280 villages and hamlets.  I've 
visited almost 90% to map them and assess if they are really still a 
place.  Many have been added from NPE and they just don't exist on the 
ground any more.  I then judge village versus hamlet on criteria, like 
size, is there a school, church, shop etc. and what does the Wikipedia 
entry or other web sites say.  I then add local knowledge.

Having done this work I would prefer that a bulk upload doesn't add 
places in the county without prior discussion.  You would probably be 
able to find someone to do a sanity check like this for many (most? 
all?) areas.  My experience is that sources of UK places need human 
intervention to make them useful.

Cheers, Chris




More information about the Talk-transit mailing list