[Talk-transit] [Talk-gb-westmidlands] NaPTAN import starts - Birmingham trial area first

Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) ajrlists at googlemail.com
Tue Mar 31 13:25:37 BST 2009


Brian Prangle [mailto:bprangle at googlemail.com] wrote:
>Sent: 31 March 2009 9:34 AM
>To: Thomas Wood
>Cc: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists); talk-transit at openstreetmap.org; Talk-
>gb-westmidlands at openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [Talk-transit] [Talk-gb-westmidlands] NaPTAN import starts -
>Birmingham trial area first
>
>
>	> I've had an initial look . We seem to have a pretty big problem in
>alignment
>	> in the City Centre (probably because of our estimations arising
>from crap
>	> GPS traces)- so I've not done any editing/merging until we agree
an
>	> approach.
>
>
>	Yeah, I was looking at the city centre a little before the import,
>	wasnt sure who to blame. (Google maps also use naptan data, so if
you
>	compare the points with the aerial view, you can see they're a bit
>	off) - We still need a good way of aligning them though without
>	referring to them.
>
>
>	> Lots of the other data hasn't imported completely yet (lots of
>	> naptan nodes but no data tagged) so I'll wait and take another
>look.
>
>
>	All data was uploaded as of about 10pm last night. If you find any
>	elements that look like glitches in the conversion, please report
>them
>	to me.
>
>Looks OK now
>
>
>
>
>	> We also need to agree on the verified/unverified tag - do we
delete
>or change
>	> the yes/no value?
>
>
>	The idea was to delete it.  I agree  unverified:no is just plain
>counter-intertuitive
>

I've been deleting where I already have a stop in the db and have merged the
data to the naptan node. Where my nodes are some way off the naptan nodes
I'm leaving them alone until a resurvey check.

Cheers

Andy

>
>
>
>






More information about the Talk-transit mailing list