[Talk-transit] Relations for stop areas in NaPTAN
frankie at frankieroberto.com
Mon Sep 28 16:10:59 BST 2009
2009/9/28 Thomas Wood <grand.edgemaster at gmail.com>
> I think the type=* tag on relations is ugly, similar to the original
> class=* tag proposed on every element in the early days of OSM.
> class=* was dropped, as should type=* be.
I don't know too much about class=, but I can see an argument that type=
might be redundant on relations. However, given that it is in such
widespread use, I guess this is a bigger debate to have.
Right now, I'm more concerned about which of these patterns is better:
The first one has the advantage of following the X=Y, Y=Z tag hierarchy
convention, the second has the advantage of re-using tags that have long
been adopted for nodes.
Experience Designer, Rattle
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-transit