[Talk-transit] Proposed Feature - RFC - Public Transport

Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxford at gmail.com
Fri Dec 10 11:31:29 GMT 2010


On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Michał Borsuk <michal.borsuk at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/10/2010 11:20 AM, Richard Mann wrote:
>>
>> I think
>> the biggest uncertainty is how you handle loops at the end of a route
>> - do you have overlapping single-direction relations, pick an
>> abritrary position to change direction, or stick with having both
>> directions in the same relation and let the data user worry about it.
>>
>>
>
> I do it this way: end points from the timetable (Kursbuch), so the "forward"
> role goes to the last stop indicated in the timetable, and the "backward"
> role goes forth.

I was thinking that role=loop on the loop stops might be one way to do
it, with role=terminus for single-point route ends (and as a notional
terminus on a loop)? This might also avoid the need for
role=forward/backward on all the other stops.

Richard



More information about the Talk-transit mailing list