[Talk-transit] Proposed Feature - 2nd RFC - Public Transport

[Michał Borsuk]

Am 12.01.2011 11:16, schrieb Richard Mann:
> 1) We need to see a proposal that is explicitly scalable. No more than
> one page to describe how to map a basic bus or tram line in a way that
> is consistent with existing usage (ie if you look around you will see
> lots of examples to reinforce your understanding).
>
> 2) There is no clear case for a new public_transport key. If existing
> usage of existing tags works ok for basic situations, that should be
> enough.
That seems to be a sensible proposal, but do we put it into the 
standard? If so, then the one-relation version should be accompanied by 
a comment on roles.

> 3) It doesn't matter whether people use one relation per direction or
> two. Both are readily parsable. However, "forward"/"backward" must
> refer to the direction of the way, not the direction of the route,
> otherwise you are cutting across other uses of those roles.


So, who's volunteering to prepare yet another wiki page that would 
explain the situation?

And, personal request hereby. If you provide examples how to map (also 
how not to map would be good), please do not only provide your own 
examples.


-- 
Best regards, mit freundlichen Grüssen, meilleurs sentiments, Pozdrowienia,

Michał Borsuk