[Talk-transit] NEW Proposed Feature
Cartinus
cartinus at xs4all.nl
Fri Jan 28 12:09:58 GMT 2011
On Friday 28 January 2011 09:05:44 Dominik Mahrer (Teddy) wrote:
> It seams to me, this proposal is a sipmlified version of my proposal
> with the following key features:
>
> Used well known tags for stops (also possible with mine).
> Stop area left away (also possible with mine).
> One relation per direction (identical to mine).
> Route master left away (also possible with mine).
>
> So I do not see a real benefit of this proposal...
Most of the opposition against your proposal is probably generated by the
presentation. You describe all options in complete detail and then somewere
in the paragraph the reader can find whether something is optional or not.
(Plus most what is now optional was not optional in your initial proposal.)
This makes it difficult to read for people who want to know how to map the
simple cases.
Compare this to how the Karlsruhe Schema [1] for housenumbers was started.
First it describes the basics. Then below that it describes the more complex
use cases, which are clearly marked optional.
Secondly if you first document and try to agree on the basics, then the
discussion is not (normally) disturbed by endless discussions about details
in the optional stuff.
[1]
<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Karlsruhe_Schema>
--
m.v.g.,
Cartinus
More information about the Talk-transit
mailing list